The 997 GT3/RS Cars For Sale Thread...
03-06-2023, 03:27 PM
BaT should include in their seller agreements a representation that seller knows of no incidents or body work on the listed car, other than as disclosed on the CarFax. If there is more history, then BaT should include it in the ad. If the seller won't make the representation, reject the listing. Then, each ad could either disclose or state something like: "The seller represents that he or she has no knowledge of any accidents or body involving this example, other than as disclosed on the CarFax."
03-06-2023, 03:35 PM
Burning Brakes
Wow 237 was a surprise, kind of figured the silver and switched out colors would tone down the excitement for this RS.
Epic car nonetheless
Epic car nonetheless
03-06-2023, 05:33 PM
Rennlist Member
. That's why high auctions and low auctions get thrown out of the 'what its worth' convo.
The following users liked this post:
welikethetrack (03-06-2023)
03-06-2023, 05:49 PM
Burning Brakes
I noticed that as well. The dude who won looks to almost never lose (20 cars won) so he wasn't ever stopping haha
03-06-2023, 06:08 PM
Rennlist Member
I find it annoying that the BaT listings never address the seller's knowledge of prior accidents or body work. They only address what the CarFax indicates.
BaT should include in their seller agreements a representation that seller knows of no incidents or body work on the listed car, other than as disclosed on the CarFax. If there is more history, then BaT should include it in the ad. If the seller won't make the representation, reject the listing. Then, each ad could either disclose or state something like: "The seller represents that he or she has no knowledge of any accidents or body involving this example, other than as disclosed on the CarFax."
BaT should include in their seller agreements a representation that seller knows of no incidents or body work on the listed car, other than as disclosed on the CarFax. If there is more history, then BaT should include it in the ad. If the seller won't make the representation, reject the listing. Then, each ad could either disclose or state something like: "The seller represents that he or she has no knowledge of any accidents or body involving this example, other than as disclosed on the CarFax."
The following users liked this post:
Wonderdan (03-06-2023)
03-06-2023, 07:42 PM
The following users liked this post:
usctrojanGT3 (03-07-2023)
03-06-2023, 08:11 PM
I find it annoying that the BaT listings never address the seller's knowledge of prior accidents or body work. They only address what the CarFax indicates.
BaT should include in their seller agreements a representation that seller knows of no incidents or body work on the listed car, other than as disclosed on the CarFax. If there is more history, then BaT should include it in the ad. If the seller won't make the representation, reject the listing. Then, each ad could either disclose or state something like: "The seller represents that he or she has no knowledge of any accidents or body involving this example, other than as disclosed on the CarFax."
BaT should include in their seller agreements a representation that seller knows of no incidents or body work on the listed car, other than as disclosed on the CarFax. If there is more history, then BaT should include it in the ad. If the seller won't make the representation, reject the listing. Then, each ad could either disclose or state something like: "The seller represents that he or she has no knowledge of any accidents or body involving this example, other than as disclosed on the CarFax."
03-06-2023, 10:32 PM
Rennlist Member
The following 2 users liked this post by FLT6SPD:
jonwb (03-07-2023),
SupraSaiyan (03-07-2023)
03-07-2023, 12:21 AM
Rennlist Member
Check out that silver 997 RS buyer’s win and bid history. Bought two cars today and 20 purchases recently. This car is probably going up for sale again soon.. sigh
03-07-2023, 02:16 AM
The following users liked this post:
welikethetrack (03-07-2023)
03-07-2023, 07:55 PM
03-08-2023, 04:15 PM
Rennlist Member
maybe?
I may have missed it, but I wonder if this was the same car that we discussed at length ~ 2 1/2 - 3 years ago when it was F/S @ Porsche of Irvine. I think it sold for ~ $105k.
It was orange / sil then. I offered $103 and was rebuffed.
I may have missed it, but I wonder if this was the same car that we discussed at length ~ 2 1/2 - 3 years ago when it was F/S @ Porsche of Irvine. I think it sold for ~ $105k.
It was orange / sil then. I offered $103 and was rebuffed.
03-08-2023, 04:42 PM
Rennlist Member
I did the review of that car. I looked for it but failed. My google timeline says I was at Porsche Irvin on Jan 19, 2021 but I think that was the second time I visited that place so I'm thinking the date could be a little earlier if someone wants to look for the posts.