User 52121

I've heard the 7500 number as a max from several reputable sources, and not just limited to our CD's.

I'm sticking to 5k intervals, tops.

TAch Miami

The bridge warranty doesn't matter to us since we have the two year CPO extension. It goes into the last half of 2018 for 2013 owners and the fix has a 2017 Oct/Nov first deadline. I don't know what VW and Audi owners got so it should be more important to them.

____________
2014 991 TT
2013 958 CD

skiahh

That's interesting. I guess I'll be stuck at somewhere between 5000 and 7500 then!

txhansen

I got an email yesterday from Volkswagen group of America stating "The class bridge warranty will expire on the date on which an Emissions Compliant Repair for your vehicle is approved or disapproved by the EPA and CARB." Apparently the extension wasn't really for 2 years as I understood, but just until that decision is final. Anyone else get this document? I have a 2013 if that makes a difference.

gnat

Different things. We got a few CPO so we currently have a warranty in effect (unless you've piled on the miles). This bridge warranty just applies to those that do not have a warranty.


At least that's my interpretation.

deilenberger

Totally OT sort of - but not actually.

This thread will be moving to the 958 subforum, since all diesels being discussed are 958's. This will happen on or after July 27th. There will be an expiring link left in the "Cayenne" top-level forum that will redirect you to the link in the 958 forum.

If you've bookmarked this thread - wait until it's been moved - then please redo your bookmark.

Other than that - continue as usual..

skiahh

Progress?

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2...-for-sale.html

MayorMcCheese

I saw this on CNBC today.. I overheard Porsche Cayenne Recall I nearly jumped thru the door to see what recall just got issued lol

visitador

I think that one has to deal with Europe. Most likely something we already found in the US.

What amazes me is the degree of $ counting that created the mess. If you guys go to the beginning of this thread, we were talking about the 2.0 issues and that it does not apply to 3.0 because we use AdBlue. I could not imagine that cheating occurred because the manufacturers did not want a bigger AdBlue tank because of space and/or service interval.

All this mess because of the size of the AdBlue tank?

deilenberger

Folks - this thread has been stickied in the 958 subforum. When interest/posting in it dies off it may be un-stickied.

Searcher356

Hardly. Sizes and shapes of the AdBlue tank are inconsistent from manufacturer to manufacturer, and model to model. The DerSpeigel article was just wrong. Not the first time.

WhipE350

Met with Claims gentleman last Wed and had funds in my account today. Painless and less than 20 mins...and we chatted for a while.

sclemmons

What do they say the payment obligates you to do?

billyg

Claim @ the dealership like most painless. So I ask 1 salesman about the fix and he said they'll have 1 shortly. I then ask my service tech guy and he says no 1 knows a thing, and thinks it'll be a software fix, and like some have said an add blue tank modification whenever. Finally, I ask the service manager and he says they might never come up with a fix. He said the field rep is completely in the dark as Porsche corporate is extremely tight lipped.

WhipE350

In my case all the paper work I saw didn't obligate to anything. It might have online when I made the appointment, I don't remember. I think when I initially agreed to be part of the class action was when I committed or opted out of any other claims.

I know I felt obligated to spend money on new suspension parts for my 997, guilt free .