Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

VW/Audi 07K (2.5L 20V I5) Swap Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2019, 02:36 PM
  #1681  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,550
Received 650 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

bigger surface area is more important than more rows.
you only add more rows, if you can't fit a larger surface area.
but it's still not as good as just making a larger-face, skinnier radiator.

FWIW.
Old 10-16-2019, 10:56 AM
  #1682  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I suspect there would be a much higher take rate on a radiator that mounts in the factory location. Personally, I don't like the idea of moving the radiator back that far, as it uses up all that space in front of the engine that makes it so much easier to work on. I know you're looking at doing that to make room for a larger FMIC, but there are alternative ways to fit a large intercooler while also keeping the radiator in the factory mounts. Just my 2 cents. I'm sure there will be a lot of different variations in how people do the cooling systems, so there's no right or wrong way.


Originally Posted by Cjar
How strongly does everyone feel about the radiator location and having both connections on the left? A few considerations, please vote!
  1. I am planning to have my intercooler mount just rearward of the stock 944 radiator location, and the radiator just behind that. If I come up with a mounting system for this is everyone OK with this setup?
  2. Wizard can build a radiator same as their current offering, but with 2 rows of 1.25" tubes which they say will cool 500+hp, for $150 extra (figure $700 without volume discount for just the rad).
    • + known quality name brand, can be used without a special mounting system if you are putting your intercooler in the bumper (or going N/A like Mike).
    • + can use 944 fans/shroud as direct bolt-on
    • - have to plumb the lower hose from the bottom right (Mike did it, I don't see this as a big deal)
    • - $700
  3. Griffin has a radiator that has both connections on the right with a fill cap, 22"x13", with 2 rows of 1.25" tubes. This has similar dimensions to the Wizard above (slightly smaller), and I've asked for a price to remove the filler and swap the ports to the left.
    • + less expensive (the standard version is $274, plus customization, total should be a few hundred less than the Wizard)
    • + both hose connections on the left side
    • + known name brand
    • - would need to make a shroud and mount fans, or adapt the 944 setup
    • - would need to add cost to put in the 944 fan switch port if needed (could also mount in an inline fitting in the hose run)
    • - less straight forward mounting scheme
    • - not quite as big as the Wizard, so cooling capacity?? at high loads and low speeds unless we use higher CFM fan(s)

Looking forward to everyone's opinion.
Old 10-16-2019, 03:35 PM
  #1683  
Cjar
Instructor
 
Cjar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 101
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vt951
I suspect there would be a much higher take rate on a radiator that mounts in the factory location. Personally, I don't like the idea of moving the radiator back that far, as it uses up all that space in front of the engine that makes it so much easier to work on. I know you're looking at doing that to make room for a larger FMIC, but there are alternative ways to fit a large intercooler while also keeping the radiator in the factory mounts. Just my 2 cents. I'm sure there will be a lot of different variations in how people do the cooling systems, so there's no right or wrong way.
I would like to keep as much room up front as possible, but the great thing with this engine is there isn't much you need to get at on the front - change the belt, replace water pump, maybe change the front seal. No timing belts and associated regular service required up front on the 07K.

I've never seen behind the bumper on a 951, but on my '83 there is basically zero room for a FMIC that's taller than 6" or thicker than 2.5" (while keeping AC) without trimming the valence. Maybe that's all that's necessary if most of the guys here are doing N/A or milder turbo setups? If I were in that boat I'd probably do what Mike is and run a stock (or stock-replacement radiator from Wizard) and use the shorter intercooler from Vibrant. Running to Napa for a longer hose run is much cheaper than custom radiator and mounts no matter how you slice it.

If this option from Griffin works out, I hope to have a low-cost rad with both ports on the left, that has 500hp cooling capacity and will fit in the stock location or rearward, with just some adaption required to fit the stock 944/951 radiator mounts.

Please chime in everyone, I'd like to come up with something that will work for all.

Craig
Old 10-16-2019, 03:48 PM
  #1684  
senior_squishy
Racer
 
senior_squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Maine
Posts: 280
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Honestly, I'm not trying to mess around with any of the heat exchangers on mine. Actually everything north of the pulleys I'm going to try to keep as stock as possible (Flip-up headlights & drive motor are the LAST things I remove from this car). My setup will be N/A for about 2 years, maybe less, and once I have the weight and balance change figured out, I'll add more power and think about doing all the fancy bigger heat exchangers. Also knowing how hard it is to keep belts on this thing, I'm leaning very heavily towards electric AC. The ones I linked a while ago are going to be the way to go.
Old 10-16-2019, 08:05 PM
  #1685  
Brian Smith
Intermediate
 
Brian Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 36
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would rather have it mount in the stock location and have the fittings on the correct side as well.

Brian
Old 10-22-2019, 05:42 PM
  #1686  
EastEnd944
Rennlist Member
 
EastEnd944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Does the success of the oil pan on the track mean that production pans will be made soon? I'd be very happy to have my engine sitting in the bay before it gets so cold that I can't feel my fingers while working in the garage

Also in terms of cooling, it appears the majority is looking to keep things close to stock. While this wont be helpful to those doing so, I thought I would mention that I've decided to attempt doing a rear mounted setup, and while it is more work to do so I believe it'll be more beneficial for my build. I had mocked up my engine and realized that If I keep the radiator in its current position it will be very difficult to mount my turbo in front of the gallardo manifold while keeping the exhaust piping as direct as possible. My goal is to place the turbo perpendicular to the motor itself, and have the turbine inlet bolted directly to the outlet of the manifold. This should also place the compressor outlet in almost a direct position to have a short and straight pipe going into the intercooler, keeping both intake and exhaust piping short and direct as possible. Since the coolant inlet and outlet are on the rear and side of the engine running plumbing to the rear should be a pretty straightforward task, and the longer lines should add additional coolant to the system as well as give it more time to cool before re-entering the block. I already have the spare tire well removed and am not running an exhaust to the rear, so there is plenty of room in the back to mount the radiator. My largest concern is airflow, however I plan to run some strong fans and make a shroud to function as a scoop for cool air. This is obviously more work than fitting a radiator up front, but I'm hoping that it'll be worth it.

I'm definitely interested to hear some of your opinions on this, as I know people have brought it up in the past on rennlist and have been shot down rather quickly.
Old 10-22-2019, 05:49 PM
  #1687  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,550
Received 650 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

a pretty big turbo is known to fit behind the passenger headlight area; adding a little bit of pipe (or an elbow) won't affect your performance/spool in any way you could feel or measure.

Old 10-23-2019, 11:52 AM
  #1688  
senior_squishy
Racer
 
senior_squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Maine
Posts: 280
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EastEnd944
Does the success of the oil pan on the track mean that production pans will be made soon? I'd be very happy to have my engine sitting in the bay before it gets so cold that I can't feel my fingers while working in the garage
When I pulled my 07k from the donor car I bought, it was around 20-30 deg outside, so I'm just used to it at this point. Winter break is the only time of year I really have to work on anything, and it's looking like that's when everything will be ready. I'm not in too much of a rush, but I definitely feel your excitement!!!


I thought I would mention that I've decided to attempt doing a rear mounted setup, and while it is more work to do so I believe it'll be more beneficial for my build....My largest concern is airflow, however I plan to run some strong fans and make a shroud to function as a scoop for cool air. This is obviously more work than fitting a radiator up front, but I'm hoping that it'll be worth it.
I'm definitely interested to hear some of your opinions on this, as I know people have brought it up in the past on rennlist and have been shot down rather quickly.
I saw BBI motorsport built a Pike's Peak hill climb 911 on Hoonigan's YT channel, but thats also an RR, so no long lengths of lines. My biggest concern would be line placement and protection, immediately after would be airflow. They made a pretty gnarly air scoop for their stuff, and unless you go plexiglass for the hatch, you might find yourself hacking up the body for some ducting, or even under-body ducts, which would be pretty wicked IMO. I say go for it; whats the worst that can happen? It doesn't cool enough and you fab up a solution for the front? It would still be a wicked cool build!!

Last edited by senior_squishy; 10-23-2019 at 09:45 PM.
Old 10-23-2019, 03:04 PM
  #1689  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Production pans will begin soon. I have 17 of the cast upper pans at the CNC shop now to get machined. We are waiting for the machine that they programmed our prototype pans on to be freed up, so hopefully this week they will be underway. Following machining, if all goes well with the fabrication and welding, I expect the first batch of oil pans will be ready to ship before the end of the year. I know this is a long time to wait... your patience is greatly appreciated! The people working on these pans all have day jobs, so it's not always easy to get a production run of fab and welding work done in a short amount of time. But, these are guys that I have used for many years and trust their work, so I'd rather wait a little bit and get it done right.

Originally Posted by EastEnd944
Does the success of the oil pan on the track mean that production pans will be made soon? I'd be very happy to have my engine sitting in the bay before it gets so cold that I can't feel my fingers while working in the garage

Also in terms of cooling, it appears the majority is looking to keep things close to stock. While this wont be helpful to those doing so, I thought I would mention that I've decided to attempt doing a rear mounted setup, and while it is more work to do so I believe it'll be more beneficial for my build. I had mocked up my engine and realized that If I keep the radiator in its current position it will be very difficult to mount my turbo in front of the gallardo manifold while keeping the exhaust piping as direct as possible. My goal is to place the turbo perpendicular to the motor itself, and have the turbine inlet bolted directly to the outlet of the manifold. This should also place the compressor outlet in almost a direct position to have a short and straight pipe going into the intercooler, keeping both intake and exhaust piping short and direct as possible. Since the coolant inlet and outlet are on the rear and side of the engine running plumbing to the rear should be a pretty straightforward task, and the longer lines should add additional coolant to the system as well as give it more time to cool before re-entering the block. I already have the spare tire well removed and am not running an exhaust to the rear, so there is plenty of room in the back to mount the radiator. My largest concern is airflow, however I plan to run some strong fans and make a shroud to function as a scoop for cool air. This is obviously more work than fitting a radiator up front, but I'm hoping that it'll be worth it.

I'm definitely interested to hear some of your opinions on this, as I know people have brought it up in the past on rennlist and have been shot down rather quickly.
Old 10-23-2019, 10:00 PM
  #1690  
EastEnd944
Rennlist Member
 
EastEnd944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Long Island
Posts: 73
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by senior_squishy
When I pulled my 07k from the donor car I bought, it was around 20-30 deg outside, so I'm just used to it at this point. Winter break is the only time of year I really have to work on anything, and it's looking like that's when everything will ready. I'm not in too much of a rush, but I definitely feel your excitement!!!

I saw BBI motorsport built a Pike's Peak hill climb 911 on Hoonigan's YT channel, but thats also an RR, so no long lengths of lines. My biggest concern would be line placement and protection, immediately after would be airflow. They made a pretty gnarly air scoop for their stuff, and unless you go plexiglass for the hatch, you might find yourself hacking up the body for some ducting, or even under-body ducts, which would be pretty wicked IMO. I say go for it; whats the worst that can happen? It doesn't cool enough and you fab up a solution for the front? It would still be a wicked cool build!!
Definitely on the same page as you, not in a dire rush to get everything. I'm hoping I'll be able to get a majority of the work done over winter break as well. I wanted to go with having the turbo behind the passenger headlight but couldn't figure out a way to get it to work on my particular build. The current plan is some under body ducting to hopefully force air into the rad at speed, possibly even NACA ducts to replace the rear quarter windows but that's far more expensive than I'd like. Since my exhaust wont run to the rear I plan on running aluminum pipe under the torque tube to keep them out of the way. I definitely agree about the worst case scenario, really wouldn't be too horrible if it doesn't work out. Only real downside would be moving some things around and swapping the radiator for one of different dimensions. Once I start getting things mocked up I'll post some pictures.

Also, Alan I hope you know I had no ill intention with that comment, I was only looking for an update as I started to get concerned I might've missed something with all the time I've spent away from the thread. I understand this whole process is a huge undertaking and I am in awe that you guys were able to get mike's car running and driving. I completely agree with you on using people you trust to get the job done right, even if that means longer waiting periods.
The following users liked this post:
Power Window Repair (10-24-2019)
Old 10-24-2019, 07:06 AM
  #1691  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EastEnd944
Does the success of the oil pan on the track mean that production pans will be made soon? I'd be very happy to have my engine sitting in the bay before it gets so cold that I can't feel my fingers while working in the garage

Also in terms of cooling, it appears the majority is looking to keep things close to stock. While this wont be helpful to those doing so, I thought I would mention that I've decided to attempt doing a rear mounted setup, and while it is more work to do so I believe it'll be more beneficial for my build. I had mocked up my engine and realized that If I keep the radiator in its current position it will be very difficult to mount my turbo in front of the gallardo manifold while keeping the exhaust piping as direct as possible. My goal is to place the turbo perpendicular to the motor itself, and have the turbine inlet bolted directly to the outlet of the manifold. This should also place the compressor outlet in almost a direct position to have a short and straight pipe going into the intercooler, keeping both intake and exhaust piping short and direct as possible. Since the coolant inlet and outlet are on the rear and side of the engine running plumbing to the rear should be a pretty straightforward task, and the longer lines should add additional coolant to the system as well as give it more time to cool before re-entering the block. I already have the spare tire well removed and am not running an exhaust to the rear, so there is plenty of room in the back to mount the radiator. My largest concern is airflow, however I plan to run some strong fans and make a shroud to function as a scoop for cool air. This is obviously more work than fitting a radiator up front, but I'm hoping that it'll be worth it.

I'm definitely interested to hear some of your opinions on this, as I know people have brought it up in the past on rennlist and have been shot down rather quickly.
I'd be interested in your build intentions. Is this for a racecar? Do you have any diagrams of your intended build with location of intake, turbo and other ancillaries? Rear mounted cooling has been done but as far as I'm aware it was only in the Orca series cars. Cool project but I wonder if the desire to have the closest proximity of turbo to motor isn't by virtue of a knock-on effect, creating other dilemmas such as rear mounted cooling setup? Perhaps I've misinterpreted your intentions?
Old 10-24-2019, 08:27 AM
  #1692  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

None taken whatsoever. You guys are all being extremely patient, so sometimes I feel like I should explain why it’s taking so long.


Originally Posted by EastEnd944
Also, Alan I hope you know I had no ill intention with that comment, I was only looking for an update as I started to get concerned I might've missed something with all the time I've spent away from the thread. I understand this whole process is a huge undertaking and I am in awe that you guys were able to get mike's car running and driving. I completely agree with you on using people you trust to get the job done right, even if that means longer waiting periods.
Old 10-24-2019, 11:08 AM
  #1693  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,550
Received 650 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

Nice thing if you're committed to a tear rad is you can go totally nuts with sizing--cut out the trunk floor and you can fit a 30x30 rad or bigger back there.

And a mega monster industrial fan, lol
Old 10-24-2019, 11:35 AM
  #1694  
senior_squishy
Racer
 
senior_squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Maine
Posts: 280
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vt951
None taken whatsoever. You guys are all being extremely patient, so sometimes I feel like I should explain why it’s taking so long.
That being said Alan, I think sometimes I forget this is a custom job and on top of everything yall have day jobs as well. I know I really appreciate all the work being done; Sometimes it's just hard to contain the excitement of how awesome this swap is, and that we have the opportunity to do exactly what you're doing. Usually whenever I see threads like these, it's a one-off job & the fabrication is too complex to follow for anyone else who wants to do the same thing.
Old 10-24-2019, 01:25 PM
  #1695  
Power Window Repair
Former Vendor
 
Power Window Repair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: 2439 E. McDowell Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85008
Posts: 116
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EastEnd944
Definitely on the same page as you, not in a dire rush to get everything. I'm hoping I'll be able to get a majority of the work done over winter break as well. I wanted to go with having the turbo behind the passenger headlight but couldn't figure out a way to get it to work on my particular build. The current plan is some under body ducting to hopefully force air into the rad at speed, possibly even NACA ducts to replace the rear quarter windows but that's far more expensive than I'd like. Since my exhaust wont run to the rear I plan on running aluminum pipe under the torque tube to keep them out of the way. I definitely agree about the worst case scenario, really wouldn't be too horrible if it doesn't work out. Only real downside would be moving some things around and swapping the radiator for one of different dimensions. Once I start getting things mocked up I'll post some pictures.

Also, Alan I hope you know I had no ill intention with that comment, I was only looking for an update as I started to get concerned I might've missed something with all the time I've spent away from the thread. I understand this whole process is a huge undertaking and I am in awe that you guys were able to get mike's car running and driving. I completely agree with you on using people you trust to get the job done right, even if that means longer waiting periods.
EastEnd944, those rear quarter panel regulators can be quite pricey. We offer a rebuild service for $199 on those regulators. Our rebuilds include metal replacements for the cheap plastic that breaks. Let us know if you need our service.


Quick Reply: VW/Audi 07K (2.5L 20V I5) Swap Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:33 AM.