718 GT4RS
#2761
#2762
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The primary advantage that the double wishbone front gives you VS MacPherson strut is way more dynamic camber. The more suspension compression you have going into a turn, the more dynamic negative camber of the wheel you get on double wishbones.
Don't get hung up on spring rates. It's not too meaningful to compare the higher spring rates of the double wishbone 992 GT3 to those of the strut 991. To achieve the same wheel rate (overall "stiffness"), double wishbones would require a MUCH higher spring rate than a MacPherson strut spring rate would. The double wishbone design exerts greater leverage on the spring than a strut design does. However on double wishbones, you don't want the spring to be TOO stiff because that can reduce the dynamic compression to a point that it negates the advantage of the dynamic camber that the double wishbones give you.
Don't get hung up on spring rates. It's not too meaningful to compare the higher spring rates of the double wishbone 992 GT3 to those of the strut 991. To achieve the same wheel rate (overall "stiffness"), double wishbones would require a MUCH higher spring rate than a MacPherson strut spring rate would. The double wishbone design exerts greater leverage on the spring than a strut design does. However on double wishbones, you don't want the spring to be TOO stiff because that can reduce the dynamic compression to a point that it negates the advantage of the dynamic camber that the double wishbones give you.
But even on a double wishbone suspension you don't want to increase camber too much under braking due to diving to keep the front tire contact patch as stable as possible and to prevent significant changes in toe geometry, so running stiffer spring rates on the front helps with that as well.. If you notice my avatar that is a NSX which was my old track car..
Keep in mind what the actual article stated:
Originally Posted by evo.co.uk
Damping and spring rates have been set up to reduce body roll, pitch and dive under braking and acceleration
Last edited by 2slow2speed; 10-21-2021 at 12:37 PM. Reason: clarify
#2763
#2764
#2765
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 0-Day
The primary advantage that the double wishbone front gives you VS MacPherson strut is way more dynamic camber. The more suspension compression you have going into a turn, the more dynamic negative camber of the wheel you get on double wishbones.
Don't get hung up on spring rates. It's not too meaningful to compare the higher spring rates of the double wishbone 992 GT3 to those of the strut 991. To achieve the same wheel rate (overall "stiffness"), double wishbones would require a MUCH higher spring rate than a MacPherson strut spring rate would. The double wishbone design exerts greater leverage on the spring than a strut design does. However on double wishbones, you don't want the spring to be TOO stiff because that can reduce the dynamic compression to a point that it negates the advantage of the dynamic camber that the double wishbones give you.
Don't get hung up on spring rates. It's not too meaningful to compare the higher spring rates of the double wishbone 992 GT3 to those of the strut 991. To achieve the same wheel rate (overall "stiffness"), double wishbones would require a MUCH higher spring rate than a MacPherson strut spring rate would. The double wishbone design exerts greater leverage on the spring than a strut design does. However on double wishbones, you don't want the spring to be TOO stiff because that can reduce the dynamic compression to a point that it negates the advantage of the dynamic camber that the double wishbones give you.
You could for most people into thinking you've put a different suspension on their car just by blinding them to different tire pressures... It's so funny when all the new 992 GT3 Owners Drive on the street and tell you how much better the car handles... Suspension still hasn't gotten out of bed
Last edited by CAlexio; 10-21-2021 at 01:18 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by CAlexio:
#2766
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes exactly, I wish more people understood this... The advantage of more sophisticated suspension, comes at the extremes of cornering, especially if there's a bumpy surface, so you can keep the wheel more perpendicular and connected to the ground more of the time. so many people profess to feel a difference, between the cars handling with different suspension even at less than extreme cornering angles at speed... When in reality what they're feeling is placebo a fact, tire sidewall, and programming of the steering rack. Suspension most the time hasn't even come in to play.
You could for most people into thinking you've put a different suspension on their car just by blinding them to different tire pressures... It's so funny when all the new 992 GT3 Owners Drive on the street and tell you how much better the car handles... Suspension still hasn't gotten out of bed
You could for most people into thinking you've put a different suspension on their car just by blinding them to different tire pressures... It's so funny when all the new 992 GT3 Owners Drive on the street and tell you how much better the car handles... Suspension still hasn't gotten out of bed
Last edited by 2slow2speed; 10-21-2021 at 01:34 PM. Reason: clarify
The following users liked this post:
GrantG (10-22-2021)
#2767
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This was posted on the GT4 RS engine speculation thread, so doubt that many 992 GT3's will be seeing the rear end of the GT4 RS.
https://youtu.be/wtONvLbTPl4
https://youtu.be/wtONvLbTPl4
Also, it’s interesting to see the differences in throttle application between the two. Not sure how much time it accounts for, but the GT4RS should/could be faster than it’s “official” time if were driven in the same manner as the GT3 in that video.
#2768
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know I’ve lost a lot of fidelity in my hearing, but listening to that, the engines sound the same to me.
Also, it’s interesting to see the differences in throttle application between the two. Not sure how much time it accounts for, but the GT4RS should/could be faster than it’s “official” time if were driven in the same manner as the GT3 in that video.
Also, it’s interesting to see the differences in throttle application between the two. Not sure how much time it accounts for, but the GT4RS should/could be faster than it’s “official” time if were driven in the same manner as the GT3 in that video.
The GT3 engine has better response due to the ITB's, doubt that the GT4 RS engine has ITB's based on the sound of the engine and how the engine responds to throttle application..
The GT3 probably has left time on the table, doubt that the GT4 RS left too much time given how unsettled the car was.
Again just my 2 cents.
Last edited by 2slow2speed; 10-21-2021 at 01:47 PM. Reason: typos
#2769
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#2770
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Love that comparison video. Shared it with some friends - including one guy who has a 992 GT3 on order. Seems we've mostly come to similar conclusions. The GT3 just looks planted. He's flat in a lot of areas in the first 2-3 mins of video that the GT4 isn't. GT4 also seems to move around a bit more and looks like he's gotta work it harder to get the nose pointed in. My buddy drove a new GT3 in anger at Dream Racing in Vegas last week and said the turn-in and nose in general was AMAZING. (For reference he does know how to drive, raced GTB1 a number of years in PCA and co-drives with me in WRL...)
I also would not be completely astonished to find they are trying to hold the GT4 back a tiny bit.
I feel like, after watching the GT4's lap, maybe some more setup work is needed to help settle the car a bit.
What I found really impressive.... the GT4 almost looked to be catching up to the GT3 on the straights. Acceleration looks pretty wicked!!!
This car will be a bad-*** either way!
(Still... no manual = I won't be looking for one)
I also would not be completely astonished to find they are trying to hold the GT4 back a tiny bit.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
What I found really impressive.... the GT4 almost looked to be catching up to the GT3 on the straights. Acceleration looks pretty wicked!!!
This car will be a bad-*** either way!
(Still... no manual = I won't be looking for one)
#2771
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#2772
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,524
Received 823 Likes
on
452 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Love that comparison video. Shared it with some friends - including one guy who has a 992 GT3 on order. Seems we've mostly come to similar conclusions. The GT3 just looks planted. He's flat in a lot of areas in the first 2-3 mins of video that the GT4 isn't. GT4 also seems to move around a bit more and looks like he's gotta work it harder to get the nose pointed in. My buddy drove a new GT3 in anger at Dream Racing in Vegas last week and said the turn-in and nose in general was AMAZING. (For reference he does know how to drive, raced GTB1 a number of years in PCA and co-drives with me in WRL...)
I also would not be completely astonished to find they are trying to hold the GT4 back a tiny bit.
I feel like, after watching the GT4's lap, maybe some more setup work is needed to help settle the car a bit.
What I found really impressive.... the GT4 almost looked to be catching up to the GT3 on the straights. Acceleration looks pretty wicked!!!
This car will be a bad-*** either way!
(Still... no manual = I won't be looking for one)
I also would not be completely astonished to find they are trying to hold the GT4 back a tiny bit.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
What I found really impressive.... the GT4 almost looked to be catching up to the GT3 on the straights. Acceleration looks pretty wicked!!!
This car will be a bad-*** either way!
(Still... no manual = I won't be looking for one)
#2773
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@2slow2speed Intake and/or fuel flow restrictors come to mind. Its one method the governing racing bodies achieve Balance of Power (BoP) between vastly different engine configurations of the competitors.
I have a feeling tuners are going to LOVE fussing with this GT4RS.
I have a feeling tuners are going to LOVE fussing with this GT4RS.
#2775
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As Misha explained in his video, the absence of the front air vents is most likely not keeping the front planted enough. Thus the driver has to stab the throttle to induce lift off oversteer in oder to shift weight to the front to rotate the car...this is so suboptimal and likely costing several seconds on such a long lap (can see this vs the GT4 MR which has inferior tires in Misha's vid). Once you have all the front DF elements working the car will most likely be perfectly balanced and won't have to resort to this on/off stabbing of the throttle to induce rotation. It totally makes sense now that Porsche released this as "the" n ring time... it's fast enough to get GT4 /RS drivers excited, but not too fast encroach on GT3 territory. I would not expect another official time from Porsche, as they accomplished exactly what they needed to in order to keep clientele's perceptions happy across the GT3 and GT4 platforms. This time was totally sandbagged (probably only Porsche would ever have to resort to that lol but the 911 protection situation is so unique).. and not just due to the DF, but in the other things that Misha points out (driver, brake issues, only trying a couple of times, etc)
I think we'll see in the real world much closer performance and I think in amateur hands, the 4RS may even surpass the GT3 because will be easier to drive.
I think we'll see in the real world much closer performance and I think in amateur hands, the 4RS may even surpass the GT3 because will be easier to drive.
Last edited by FogCitySF; 10-21-2021 at 03:18 PM.
The following users liked this post:
DFW01TT (10-21-2021)