Diesel Cayenne and VW emission issue
#4216
I just found this.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
#4217
Crickets. Can't find anything via Google, CARB or EPA sites.
Don't think it'll be a court schedule... it'll be a rulemaking decision from one/both of those agencies. Court has approved it all, so I would think it's just follow up documents to the court saying the fix is approve, if that's the case.
If not, then more court activity - to approve extensions for cause (no $$) or at VW's request ($500/30 days).
Your Google skills are better than mine!
Don't think it'll be a court schedule... it'll be a rulemaking decision from one/both of those agencies. Court has approved it all, so I would think it's just follow up documents to the court saying the fix is approve, if that's the case.
If not, then more court activity - to approve extensions for cause (no $$) or at VW's request ($500/30 days).
I just found this.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
Your Google skills are better than mine!
#4218
I just found this.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-v...-idUSKBN1CS231
And this
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production...l-epa-carb.pdf
#4219
Crickets. Can't find anything via Google, CARB or EPA sites.
Don't think it'll be a court schedule... it'll be a rulemaking decision from one/both of those agencies. Court has approved it all, so I would think it's just follow up documents to the court saying the fix is approve, if that's the case.
If not, then more court activity - to approve extensions for cause (no $$) or at VW's request ($500/30 days).
Don't think it'll be a court schedule... it'll be a rulemaking decision from one/both of those agencies. Court has approved it all, so I would think it's just follow up documents to the court saying the fix is approve, if that's the case.
If not, then more court activity - to approve extensions for cause (no $$) or at VW's request ($500/30 days).
#4220
Interesting... from the EPA letter:
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
#4221
Interesting... from the EPA letter:
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
That next check might be coming much sooner than I was anticipating.
#4222
Interesting... from the EPA letter:
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
"Defendants shall, within ten days of the date of this approval, provide all Eligible Owners and Eligible Lessees with notice that the Emissions Modifications for Test Groups [bunch of group designations] is available...."
Wonder if it's actually available for installation?
#4223
Edit: Interesting the 2.1 and 2.2 were approved in the same letter. We were only expecting a 2.2 approval by today.
#4224
I will not be anywhere near first in line for the fix. My only motivation is the warranty for up to 8 years, which seems to cover a lot of expensive parts. With two years remaining on the 6 yr warranty, I will just wait it out a bit longer. Sure I could use the check for other things, but lets just say confidence is low in driving out of the service center with anything close to what I drove in with.
I won't be #1 in line but I likely won't sit on it either.
#4225
Here is another article with a bit more detail.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...el-suvs-in-u-s
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...el-suvs-in-u-s
#4226
Here is another article with a bit more detail.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...el-suvs-in-u-s
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...el-suvs-in-u-s
The 2015 Audi Q5 as well as the 2013-2014 VW Touareg and Porsche Cayenne SUVs will receive a software update only, while Touaregs and Cayennes from model years 2015-2016 will get hardware changes as well
#4227
I will not be anywhere near first in line for the fix. My only motivation is the warranty for up to 8 years, which seems to cover a lot of expensive parts. With two years remaining on the 6 yr warranty, I will just wait it out a bit longer. Sure I could use the check for other things, but lets just say confidence is low in driving out of the service center with anything close to what I drove in with.
Edit: Interesting the 2.1 and 2.2 were approved in the same letter. We were only expecting a 2.2 approval by today.
Edit: Interesting the 2.1 and 2.2 were approved in the same letter. We were only expecting a 2.2 approval by today.
And if that's the case, the HW may already be available, too, meaning fixes could, indeed, be ready very shortly.
I agree with you; I probably won't be first in line, either. I want to see if this neuters the vehicle before proceeding.
Interesting... that's backwards from all the rumors/speculation. Maybe taking the 2.2s to 2.1 HW configuration and then software for both?
#4228
^^^Interesting, the common assumption was backwards for the 13/14 vs 15/16. The former gets Software upgrades (I’m in favor of that) vice the Software/Hardware of the latter. Stoked as long as power and mpg is not negated.
#4229
Now with the fix approved, I get MORE money$5,055 and get to keep the diesel and everything that is awesome about it.
#4230
Not that much of a surprise to me if what has been speculated on is actually true. That is, that the 2.2s only need a software change and the 2.1s will be brought to 2.2 HW specs and then have the same software fix applied. And the simultaneous approval lends credence to this possibility.
And if that's the case, the HW may already be available, too, meaning fixes could, indeed, be ready very shortly.
I agree with you; I probably won't be first in line, either. I want to see if this neuters the vehicle before proceeding.
Interesting... that's backwards from all the rumors/speculation. Maybe taking the 2.2s to 2.1 HW configuration and then software for both?
And if that's the case, the HW may already be available, too, meaning fixes could, indeed, be ready very shortly.
I agree with you; I probably won't be first in line, either. I want to see if this neuters the vehicle before proceeding.
Interesting... that's backwards from all the rumors/speculation. Maybe taking the 2.2s to 2.1 HW configuration and then software for both?
Edit. I was wrong and the article incorrect from Bloomberg.
https://www.epa.gov/vw/epa-and-carb-...ility-vehicles
Last edited by Sword_of_the_Spirit; 10-23-2017 at 04:13 PM.