Diesel Cayenne and VW emission issue
#4276
https://www.vwcourtsettlement.com/wp..._2-1_FINAL.pdf
https://www.vwcourtsettlement.com/wp...-2-2_FINAL.pdf
The way it’s looking, I’m going to run with it as is till warranty expires or longer. I’m sure people will be in the market for a grandfathered Diesel if I ever sell. You lose some nice features (Braking downhill, etc) and add some not fun ones (def up 40%). They need to provide a complete in writing to customers about the mpg cycle and power loss. Those two items are not address specifically in the brochures.
https://www.vwcourtsettlement.com/wp...-2-2_FINAL.pdf
The way it’s looking, I’m going to run with it as is till warranty expires or longer. I’m sure people will be in the market for a grandfathered Diesel if I ever sell. You lose some nice features (Braking downhill, etc) and add some not fun ones (def up 40%). They need to provide a complete in writing to customers about the mpg cycle and power loss. Those two items are not address specifically in the brochures.
Hmmm... For the 2.1 the shifting in Sport Mode will be "less dynamic", loss of downhill engine braking (didn't know it was a specific feature, but I enjoy it quite a bit!), and loss of MPG...
Yeah. I'll pass and be perfectly happy with my half payment.
At least its finally done now and we can mostly move on (still be interested to hear how it does impact those that go for the update).
Yeah. I'll pass and be perfectly happy with my half payment.
At least its finally done now and we can mostly move on (still be interested to hear how it does impact those that go for the update).
Same with the sport shifting. While it's no DSG, it is nice and I have been enjoying that feature in the short time I've owned my CD.
As our diesels are not exactly barnstormers in the first place, I could live with a change in Sport Mode-which I will admit is fun, but don't use all that often.
To forsake 1/2 the money(Bosch $$$ too) AND more importantly, a free warranty extension which for me would be 8 more years and 85,800 miles, would not make sense for me. Let me not forget the loaner, full tank of gas and cleaning . . .
To forsake 1/2 the money(Bosch $$$ too) AND more importantly, a free warranty extension which for me would be 8 more years and 85,800 miles, would not make sense for me. Let me not forget the loaner, full tank of gas and cleaning . . .
Providing it doesn't turn into a complete dog, i think the strategy here would be to wait until your 6yr factory warranty is up, then have the emissions update done for another 4 years of what looks like a pretty good engine warranty. This way you get new parts in an older vehicle and you get to enjoy it in it's current configuration for as long as possible under warranty. For us low mileage drivers, 10 years of coverage is a pretty good deal. I'm thinking in two years or so, when the CD is 6 yrs old, we'll be less inclined to worry about its' ultimate performance. In all honesty, there's a good chance we'll move on to something else by then.
#4277
Originally Posted by Bobcat Sig
Ooof. That's not what I was hoping to read on the fix. The long distance trips is one of the reasons why I bought a CD. It's a great place to much road miles and the fuel economy is terrific.Downhill breaking is key in gnarly icy and snowy conditions. That's ****ty it's being removed.
Same with the sport shifting. While it's no DSG, it is nice and I have been enjoying that feature in the short time I've owned my CD.That's kind of where I stand; hard to pass on all that, even if things are, erm... neutered a bit.I like that plan. That's my preliminary thought right now. After all, I'm still under the original factory five year warranty.
Same with the sport shifting. While it's no DSG, it is nice and I have been enjoying that feature in the short time I've owned my CD.That's kind of where I stand; hard to pass on all that, even if things are, erm... neutered a bit.I like that plan. That's my preliminary thought right now. After all, I'm still under the original factory five year warranty.
Oops I meant to quote the idea of doing nothing during the extra two years of extended warranty before applying the fix
#4278
Ooof. That's not what I was hoping to read on the fix.
The long distance trips is one of the reasons why I bought a CD. It's a great place to much road miles and the fuel economy is terrific.
Downhill breaking is key in gnarly icy and snowy conditions. That's ****ty it's being removed.
Same with the sport shifting. While it's no DSG, it is nice and I have been enjoying that feature in the short time I've owned my CD.
That's kind of where I stand; hard to pass on all that, even if things are, erm... neutered a bit.
I like that plan. That's my preliminary thought right now. After all, I'm still under the original factory five year warranty.
The long distance trips is one of the reasons why I bought a CD. It's a great place to much road miles and the fuel economy is terrific.
Downhill breaking is key in gnarly icy and snowy conditions. That's ****ty it's being removed.
Same with the sport shifting. While it's no DSG, it is nice and I have been enjoying that feature in the short time I've owned my CD.
That's kind of where I stand; hard to pass on all that, even if things are, erm... neutered a bit.
I like that plan. That's my preliminary thought right now. After all, I'm still under the original factory five year warranty.
It's about what I expected. And to answer a previous post, I suspect the comparison numbers are baselined off the original spec/certification numbers, not real world, anecdotal numbers.
For example, Omni reports 22-23 mpg while pulling a load. I got that while loaded up and carrying 2 bikes on a hitch rack, but not pulling a mobile wind break, so either one of us is doing math wrong or these vehicles have quite a bit of variance in real world performance. Note: my numbers are based on hand calculations, not what the computer says. Oh, and I was averaging 80ish mph...
As for the automatic engine braking, I didn't even know it was there. Just means you'll now have to have some finesse on the brakes. And if you don't, the ABS is pretty damn good. I'm not overly concerned about this change.
Engine noise when warming up. I wonder if it'll clatter like a diesel now, rather than being much more like a gas engine in sound?
And the **** patters during warmup? Sounds like it'll be in Sport Mode for warm up! Of course, while it might emit less NOx because of running at higher RPMs, it certainly seems like it'd be a wash in the end, since spinning the engine faster will require more fuel overall, therefore emitting more pollutants....
But they say it'll only cost "up to" 1 mpg. So maybe not.
No, these aren't sports cars, but the Sport mode does help in lots of situations, so I hope it's not too subdued.
It'll be interesting to see some dyno numbers of "fixed" vehicles.
#4279
For me ~$3500 isn't enough to accept significantly (based on why I bought it and how I use it) changing the vehicle. To say that there is no performance impact and then to tell us that the shifting patterns (which are directly related to performance) are changing says that they are being very careful with their language and using very specific meanings of words (e.g. "performance" is probably referring only to engine output at the crank and not at the wheels or any potential torque curve changes).
I also believe that 1mpg change as much as I believe all the EPA MPG ratings.
As long as you still meet the new adjusted numbers, however, there is bubkiss you can do about it. Even if you do fall below the numbers they'll use the same "driving pattern" excuses that they do in normal circumstances.
#4281
Ooo
You mean original four year warranty (4/50K), now six (6/100K).
It's about what I expected. And to answer a previous post, I suspect the comparison numbers are baselined off the original spec/certification numbers, not real world, anecdotal numbers.
That’s the million dollar question which cannot be stated unless by Porsche, CARB, or EPA themselves. With the info given, they do not. As such (under the court restitution documents) , they “shall” furnish such data. They have only listed two data points (up to 40% def increase and up to 1mpg reduction). Who knows what the original numbers were as they were skewed from the get go under those “lab” conditions. The EPA didn’t even know, otherwise the diesels would have never hit the shores. I did see though that they did real world drive cycles (all test groups) in North LA up to Baldy and then another down into LA proper. But it isn’t clear what previous data is being compared.
For example, Omni reports 22-23 mpg while pulling a load. I got that while loaded up and carrying 2 bikes on a hitch rack, but not pulling a mobile wind break, so either one of us is doing math wrong or these vehicles have quite a bit of variance in real world performance. Note: my numbers are based on hand calculations, not what the computer says. Oh, and I was averaging 80ish mph...
As for the automatic engine braking, I didn't even know it was there. Just means you'll now have to have some finesse on the brakes. And if you don't, the ABS is pretty damn good. I'm not overly concerned about this change.
Engine noise when warming up. I wonder if it'll clatter like a diesel now, rather than being much more like a gas engine in sound?
And the **** patters during warmup? Sounds like it'll be in Sport Mode for warm up! Of course, while it might emit less NOx because of running at higher RPMs, it certainly seems like it'd be a wash in the end, since spinning the engine faster will require more fuel overall, therefore emitting more pollutants....
But they say it'll only cost "up to" 1 mpg. So maybe not.
No, these aren't sports cars, but the Sport mode does help in lots of situations, so I hope it's not too subdued.
It'll be interesting to see some dyno numbers of "fixed" vehicles.
It's about what I expected. And to answer a previous post, I suspect the comparison numbers are baselined off the original spec/certification numbers, not real world, anecdotal numbers.
That’s the million dollar question which cannot be stated unless by Porsche, CARB, or EPA themselves. With the info given, they do not. As such (under the court restitution documents) , they “shall” furnish such data. They have only listed two data points (up to 40% def increase and up to 1mpg reduction). Who knows what the original numbers were as they were skewed from the get go under those “lab” conditions. The EPA didn’t even know, otherwise the diesels would have never hit the shores. I did see though that they did real world drive cycles (all test groups) in North LA up to Baldy and then another down into LA proper. But it isn’t clear what previous data is being compared.
For example, Omni reports 22-23 mpg while pulling a load. I got that while loaded up and carrying 2 bikes on a hitch rack, but not pulling a mobile wind break, so either one of us is doing math wrong or these vehicles have quite a bit of variance in real world performance. Note: my numbers are based on hand calculations, not what the computer says. Oh, and I was averaging 80ish mph...
As for the automatic engine braking, I didn't even know it was there. Just means you'll now have to have some finesse on the brakes. And if you don't, the ABS is pretty damn good. I'm not overly concerned about this change.
Engine noise when warming up. I wonder if it'll clatter like a diesel now, rather than being much more like a gas engine in sound?
And the **** patters during warmup? Sounds like it'll be in Sport Mode for warm up! Of course, while it might emit less NOx because of running at higher RPMs, it certainly seems like it'd be a wash in the end, since spinning the engine faster will require more fuel overall, therefore emitting more pollutants....
But they say it'll only cost "up to" 1 mpg. So maybe not.
No, these aren't sports cars, but the Sport mode does help in lots of situations, so I hope it's not too subdued.
It'll be interesting to see some dyno numbers of "fixed" vehicles.
#4282
so is the long block actually covered, or are they saying that its still part of the original long block warranty?
Once the updated emissions control system software has been installed in your
vehicle, Porsche will extend your Emissions Control Systems Warranty for certain
emissions-related components. For the following 3.0 L diesel engine vehicles
repaired by the emissions modification recall, a warranty extension is applicable
as defined below
"Additionally, the engine long block warranty shall cover the engine sub-assembly
that consists of the assembled block, crankshaft, cylinder head, camshaft, and
valve train"
Its added in there at the end, but doesn't really specify if its part of the emmissions control warranty or if its a warning that its not part of it.
Once the updated emissions control system software has been installed in your
vehicle, Porsche will extend your Emissions Control Systems Warranty for certain
emissions-related components. For the following 3.0 L diesel engine vehicles
repaired by the emissions modification recall, a warranty extension is applicable
as defined below
"Additionally, the engine long block warranty shall cover the engine sub-assembly
that consists of the assembled block, crankshaft, cylinder head, camshaft, and
valve train"
Its added in there at the end, but doesn't really specify if its part of the emmissions control warranty or if its a warning that its not part of it.
#4283
so is the long block actually covered, or are they saying that its still part of the original long block warranty?
Once the updated emissions control system software has been installed in your
vehicle, Porsche will extend your Emissions Control Systems Warranty for certain
emissions-related components. For the following 3.0 L diesel engine vehicles
repaired by the emissions modification recall, a warranty extension is applicable
as defined below
"Additionally, the engine long block warranty shall cover the engine sub-assembly
that consists of the assembled block, crankshaft, cylinder head, camshaft, and
valve train"
Its added in there at the end, but doesn't really specify if its part of the emmissions control warranty or if its a warning that its not part of it.
Once the updated emissions control system software has been installed in your
vehicle, Porsche will extend your Emissions Control Systems Warranty for certain
emissions-related components. For the following 3.0 L diesel engine vehicles
repaired by the emissions modification recall, a warranty extension is applicable
as defined below
"Additionally, the engine long block warranty shall cover the engine sub-assembly
that consists of the assembled block, crankshaft, cylinder head, camshaft, and
valve train"
Its added in there at the end, but doesn't really specify if its part of the emmissions control warranty or if its a warning that its not part of it.
#4284
#4285
For example, Omni reports 22-23 mpg while pulling a load. I got that while loaded up and carrying 2 bikes on a hitch rack, but not pulling a mobile wind break, so either one of us is doing math wrong or these vehicles have quite a bit of variance in real world performance. Note: my numbers are based on hand calculations, not what the computer says. Oh, and I was averaging 80ish mph...
I've always been able to beat EPA numbers. I tend to drive pretty gently most of the time, and am almost always running cruise control outside of stop-and-go. So I suppose it's fair to offer up, "Your mileage may vary".
#4286
That's usually the definition of longblock. IMO I usually consider "longblock" to include the top end, too (heads/cams/etc.) If it's just the bottom end w/crank, rods, pistons, I've always considered that the "shortblock".
#4287
S'ok. The notice reads " . . . the engine long block warranty shall cover the engine sub-assembly that consists of the assembled block, crankshaft, cylinder head, camshaft, and valve train."
#4288
After reading about the proposed fix for the '14 CD, I'm bummed. It seems a bit more than we all anticipated and will likely impact a few aspects of our Cayennes that we all enjoy.
With all things; time will tell.
With all things; time will tell.
#4289
So, is consensus to enjoy the additional two years "CPO" Porsche courtesy warranty before doing all these modifications and collecting the second portion of the cash settlement?
#4290
Yes I think PJ has the right of it. If you are going to let them "fix" your vehicle, plan it so that you do it as soon as possible after your current coverage runs out.