Notices
Cayenne 958 - 2011-2018 2nd Generation
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Diesel Cayenne and VW emission issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2017, 11:37 PM
  #4081  
WhipE350
Burning Brakes
 
WhipE350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Near Charlotte NC
Posts: 965
Received 86 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I've felt from the beginning of the settlement that they would delay our fix as long as possible. There are many reasons to delay.

Curious does anyone remember, if they tell us Nov 1st, "OK we have an approved fix", does that mean they don't have to pay the $500 a month. I thought that was the case. Then if it is a many hour fix just think of the wait period to get it done.

It just seems to me that normal attrition of Cayennes on the road would be in their favor.

I guess we'll know soon enough when magically a fix appears or well if it doesn't. I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong.
Old 09-29-2017, 12:48 AM
  #4082  
skiahh
Rennlist Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fruita, CO
Posts: 3,170
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JRoach
If we opted-in but never turn in the final claim nor collect any settlement, do we/I still have a legal path to go after Porsche?

My concern is that I don't believe that I will know the real cost this year.
I think the only way out (if you didn't opt out before the deadline) is if the fix makes your car worse. Then you can either ask the class attorneys to go for more $$ or you could pay back anything you've already received and opt out of the whole thing to pursue them yourself.

But short of that, no... that's the purpose of a class action.
Old 09-29-2017, 03:15 PM
  #4083  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,594
Received 1,789 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Translation: may see a buy back.... this is hard



VW Takes New $2.9 Billion Hit From Diesel Scandal--Update

By Max Bernhard Published September 29, 2017 Features Dow Jones Newswires
Volkswagen AG warned Friday its third-quarter operating result would take a hit of around EUR2.5 billion ($2.94 billion), as the company continues to grapple with the fallout of the diesel emissions scandal that erupted two years ago.
The new costs stem from an increase in provisions for buyback and retrofitting programs of its 2.01 TDI vehicles in North America. Settlements surrounding that proved to be "far more technically complex and time consuming" than expected, Volkswagen said.

The car maker continues to reel from the scandal that came to light in September 2015, when it admitted some 11 million of its diesel vehicles world-wide were equipped with software that allowed them to sidestep emissions testing.

Volkswagen pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government in late 2016 and agreed to pay nearly $25 billion in fines, penalties and compensation, after it settled a number of civil lawsuits. Two Volkswagen employees have also faced charges in the U.S., with one sentenced to just over three years in prison.

In Germany, Volkswagen employees have also come under investigation. German police arrested Volkswagen's former engine chief Wolfgang Hatz in connection with the scandal, a person familiar with the situation told The Wall Street Journal on Thursday. Mr. Hatz oversaw engine development at the time Volkswagen engineers put together a plan to outfit some engines with the software that allowed them to dodge strict pollution restrictions.

Volkswagen is set to release third-quarter results on Oct. 27.

Write to Max Bernhard at Max.Bernhard@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

September 29, 2017 04:55 ET (08:55 GMT)
Old 09-29-2017, 03:29 PM
  #4084  
BenCD
Burning Brakes
 
BenCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: MA
Posts: 1,021
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I think Gen2 buyback will happen. VW needs to cut its losses and be done with the 3.0L side of things.
Old 09-29-2017, 03:50 PM
  #4085  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,594
Received 1,789 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BenCD
I think Gen2 buyback will happen. VW needs to cut its losses and be done with the 3.0L side of things.
I'm 60/40 on buyback.
Old 09-29-2017, 03:56 PM
  #4086  
BenCD
Burning Brakes
 
BenCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: MA
Posts: 1,021
Received 46 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

This . . .

"The new costs stem from an increase in provisions for buyback and retrofitting programs of its 2.01 TDI vehicles in North America. Settlements surrounding that proved to be "far more technically complex and time consuming" than expected, Volkswagen said."

. . . is very telling. It is why they cheated in the first place. If they can't even deal with the 2.0-side, how can they, at the same time, deal with the 3.0L fix?

It's either death by bullet-one time Gen2 buyback, or death by one thousand cuts in a modification that is as quoted, more technically complex and time consuming . . .
Old 09-29-2017, 04:56 PM
  #4087  
AARP_981_GT4
Advanced
 
AARP_981_GT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If they announce buy back, do it now. I would be on totally on board since it saves me 2 months of lease payments and hopefully I get the other $1,000 retribution money.
Old 09-29-2017, 06:30 PM
  #4088  
skiahh
Rennlist Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fruita, CO
Posts: 3,170
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BenCD
This . . .

"The new costs stem from an increase in provisions for buyback and retrofitting programs of its 2.01 TDI vehicles in North America. Settlements surrounding that proved to be "far more technically complex and time consuming" than expected, Volkswagen said."

. . . is very telling. It is why they cheated in the first place. If they can't even deal with the 2.0-side, how can they, at the same time, deal with the 3.0L fix?

It's either death by bullet-one time Gen2 buyback, or death by one thousand cuts in a modification that is as quoted, more technically complex and time consuming . . .
I find it telling, too, but for the opposite reason.

They've already accounted for the 3.0l costs in previous disclosures and this additional possible cost specifies ONLY the 2.0l engines with no reference to 3.0l costs.

That, to me, says they're somewhat confident that the amount they've forecast for the 3.0l program is on track.

Of course, this is for 3rd QTR results only, which is the quarter just ending, I presume (don't know their fiscal calendar) and is a look back, rather than forward projection.

Either way, I don't see anything in there that indicates, or even implies, anything about the 3.0l program.
Old 09-30-2017, 01:35 AM
  #4089  
docdent
Advanced
 
docdent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skiahh
I find it telling, too, but for the opposite reason.

They've already accounted for the 3.0l costs in previous disclosures and this additional possible cost specifies ONLY the 2.0l engines with no reference to 3.0l costs.

That, to me, says they're somewhat confident that the amount they've forecast for the 3.0l program is on track.

Of course, this is for 3rd QTR results only, which is the quarter just ending, I presume (don't know their fiscal calendar) and is a look back, rather than forward projection.

Either way, I don't see anything in there that indicates, or even implies, anything about the 3.0l program.

Or they haven’t even started on the 3.0L fix
Old 09-30-2017, 10:23 PM
  #4090  
Sword_of_the_Spirit
Banned
 
Sword_of_the_Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dusselheim
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Hello all. Ever since meeting up with Chris (Spyrex) at a Buttonwillow event last year, I've had the itch for a "Do it all" Diesel. I've found a 14' diesel in the area that should have the trigger pulled this coming Monday, the 2nd. My question is how does this play for me (compensation, and warranty)? I've looked at the 3.0 Final Settlement documents and it looks like the Jan 2017 date was a cutoff for prior owners/leasee. What about afterward?

Update...I found the info at the specific VWcourtsettlement.com site. Its pretty clear on what's stated for the DEC31,19 cutoff and eligibility. Seems like a no brainer to pull the trigger regarding your extension $500 fixes.

Where the vehicle will be registered, there are no emission requirements. As such, I'm leaning toward not getting the vehicle fixed.

Thanks guys
Old 10-01-2017, 01:13 AM
  #4091  
skiahh
Rennlist Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fruita, CO
Posts: 3,170
Received 130 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

If you're not getting it fixed, it means nothing for you in terms of compensation. That is, you won't get any. The previous owner probably already collected the 1st half and the 2nd half is contingent upon getting the fix (assuming it's approved).

Vehicle should already have had its warranty extended to 6 years/100K miles, so again, nothing for you to do there, either (except verify it, perhaps).
Old 10-01-2017, 03:35 PM
  #4092  
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,668
Received 302 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skiahh
I find it telling, too, but for the opposite reason.

They've already accounted for the 3.0l costs in previous disclosures and this additional possible cost specifies ONLY the 2.0l engines with no reference to 3.0l costs.

That, to me, says they're somewhat confident that the amount they've forecast for the 3.0l program is on track.

Of course, this is for 3rd QTR results only, which is the quarter just ending, I presume (don't know their fiscal calendar) and is a look back, rather than forward projection.

Either way, I don't see anything in there that indicates, or even implies, anything about the 3.0l program.
I'm not sure you can read too much into the details of the this statement. You would think that the buyback costs of the 2.0L are more predictable and now they may have to buyback the 3.0L, which generated the new charge.
Funny comment from my financial analyst wife yesterday, who mentioned she heard the cost of Dieselgate is now close the $30billion. She said "how can any company stay in business with that penalty?"
Old 10-01-2017, 03:41 PM
  #4093  
PORSCHEJAYHAWK
Instructor
 
PORSCHEJAYHAWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

What generation is a 2013 Cayenne Diesel? Sorry, I'm a noob.
Old 10-01-2017, 06:33 PM
  #4094  
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,668
Received 302 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PORSCHEJAYHAWK
What generation is a 2013 Cayenne Diesel? Sorry, I'm a noob.
958.1 with the 2.1 generation 3.0L engine.
Old 10-01-2017, 09:50 PM
  #4095  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,874
Received 2,581 Likes on 1,604 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docdent
Or they haven’t even started on the 3.0L fix
Fix had to be submitted in the spring or they would be heavily fined.


Quick Reply: Diesel Cayenne and VW emission issue



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:15 PM.