When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yes my opinion. When I hear these guys bragging about their "gated" GT3 and how much markup they paid to get it, it makes me barf. Since when did a manual transmission Porsche become "gated"?
😂😂😂
You brag because you paid a 100k ADM. I brag because I paid MSRP. We are not the same.
It's a big coincidence as I've gone from a 2022
GTS to a 2024 T and I think T feels much more agile and responsive! If you're all with specs and numbers, yeah you should go with the S or GTS or whatever.
The 992.2 S will come with the 48v motor, if you like it or not.
Didn't you also say no one would notice the steering difference between a GT3 with double wishbone and a Carrera with struts on the street? Sorry bud, your opinions aren't exactly trustworthy.
Someone hasn't been keeping up. The turbos will be electrified, spun in part by an electric motor to minimize turbo lag. It should be a substantial improvement in responsiveness: certainly the 400v version will be, but even the 48v should be noticeably better.
No, that's not what I was reading. I was reading the original comment to be stating that this is to fix the 'current' turbo lag of the S.
Anyway, keeping up with what??? All the rumors or do you have some official source that there is an 'e-turbo to compensate for lag on the S'? Exactly. You don't. So please stop with the 'keeping up'. Sheesh.
Until it's all official, no one really knows.
It's a big coincidence as I've gone from a 2022
GTS to a 2024 T and I think T feels much more agile and responsive! If you're all with specs and numbers, yeah you should go with the S or GTS or whatever.
The 992.2 S will come with the 48v motor, if you like it or not.
Good for you.
And I don't think I gave an opinion on the 48V, but glad you are responding to something that I didn't say.
FYI, the 997.2 engines were 3.6 and 3.8 while the 997.1 was 3.4 and 3.6.
The turbos are different between a base/T (smaller) and an S (larger). It is not just the ECU tuning. A C2S Coupe allocation is still one of the most desired as well as difficult to come by.
Turbo lag isn't S-specific, it affects every car with a turbocharger.
And, like...of course they're doing this to improve turbo lag, dude. Why else would they do it? It's not like e-turbos are going to improve fuel economy, nor help the car make more power at the top end. The press releases from Borg Warner make a point of explaining that peak boost is achieved 50% sooner or something like that. By the seat of my pants, I'd guess it's going from about a second down to half a second.
This also aligns with the oldest rumors from Car & Driver, that there would be a "T-HEV" model. Turbo hybrid. Obviously C&D had the implementation completely wrong (shocker), but this rumor seems pretty well substantiated at this point. But sure, we'll see next week
edit: to be clear, they're only not doing this on the Base because of money. It's not because the standard Carrera has much less turbo lag or anything like that. It would benefit similarly from this treatment.
Turbo lag isn't S-specific, it affects every car with a turbocharger.
And, like...of course they're doing this to improve turbo lag, dude. Why else would they do it? It's not like e-turbos are going to improve fuel economy, nor help the car make more power at the top end. The press releases from Borg Warner make a point of explaining that peak boost is achieved 50% sooner or something like that. By the seat of my pants, I'd guess it's going from about a second down to half a second.
This also aligns with the oldest rumors from Car & Driver, that there would be a "T-HEV" model. Turbo hybrid. Obviously C&D had the implementation completely wrong (shocker), but this rumor seems pretty well substantiated at this point. But sure, we'll see next week
edit: to be clear, they're only not doing this on the Base because of money. It's not because the standard Carrera has much less turbo lag or anything like that. It would benefit similarly from this treatment.
Okay, not trying to argue here, but....lol. jk.
Where are the numbers on lag? I've always wanted to see the numbers between the base, s turbos. I keep hearing about lag, but honestly, I'm not sure if what people are feeling is actually turbo lag. I used to drive a WRX. You wanna talk about lag.
I won't get numbers or stats, I'm sure, but there is a lot of anecdotal evidence and psychology playing a role here. We need some of these folks to do some blind tests. lol
I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.
Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…
I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.
Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…
Ah. Okay, so the dongle gives you stats on the boost (tracking it)? This would be interesting to see from base, S, GTS.
Ah. Okay, so the dongle gives you stats on the boost (tracking it)? This would be interesting to see from base, S, GTS.
Yes, though it’s not exactly automatic. You need the dongle connected to a PC with the logger configuration provided by the folks at M. For anyone looking to do this, I’m using the Time, Target Position Throttle, and Manifold Absolute Pressure columns, and calling it “peak boost” when MAP is within ~100 of the local maximum for the pull. The logs I’m looking at start around 4500rpm. I assume the lag would be much greater starting at, say, 2500rpm and locked in gear. That’s also the situation where e-turbos will make a huge difference.
I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.
Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…
Very interesting. To me the car feels kinda like a 2 stroke, with a very recognizable
power band. I wouldn’t ever describe that as turbo lag, because when it is in its power band 5k plus It feels extremely linear. If you are at 3k rpm it’s a relative dog till the rpm climbs. Do you see a lag when going down the road in manual mode 5k + stab the throttle? Thats data I would like to see. Take the downshift and power band out of the equation.
You brag because you paid a 100k ADM. I brag because I paid MSRP. We are not the same.
I’ve never met someone who bragged about their large ADM. Only people who either lie about their ADM bc they are embarrassed, or just tell the truth like it is. You must hang out with some crappy people.
Very interesting. To me the car feels kinda like a 2 stroke, with a very recognizable
power band. I wouldn’t ever describe that as turbo lag, because when it is in its power band 5k plus It feels extremely linear. If you are at 3k rpm it’s a relative dog till the rpm climbs. Do you see a lag when going down the road in manual mode 5k + stab the throttle? Thats data I would like to see. Take the downshift and power band out of the equation.
The data I'm looking at is manual mode around 4500rpm, 3rd gear. The tune may add some lag, considering it needs to build to a higher peak boost. But I suspect it's not a huge amount of extra lag -- maybe another tenth of a second or two?
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.