Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992.2 Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2024 | 08:59 PM
  #1786  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by AlfaM5
Yes my opinion. When I hear these guys bragging about their "gated" GT3 and how much markup they paid to get it, it makes me barf. Since when did a manual transmission Porsche become "gated"?
😂😂😂

You brag because you paid a 100k ADM. I brag because I paid MSRP. We are not the same.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:01 PM
  #1787  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by black_frog
It's a big coincidence as I've gone from a 2022
GTS to a 2024 T and I think T feels much more agile and responsive! If you're all with specs and numbers, yeah you should go with the S or GTS or whatever.

The 992.2 S will come with the 48v motor, if you like it or not.
Didn't you also say no one would notice the steering difference between a GT3 with double wishbone and a Carrera with struts on the street? Sorry bud, your opinions aren't exactly trustworthy.

Last edited by zachr; May 22, 2024 at 09:02 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:18 PM
  #1788  
Ikone's Avatar
Ikone
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 2,377
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
Someone hasn't been keeping up. The turbos will be electrified, spun in part by an electric motor to minimize turbo lag. It should be a substantial improvement in responsiveness: certainly the 400v version will be, but even the 48v should be noticeably better.
No, that's not what I was reading. I was reading the original comment to be stating that this is to fix the 'current' turbo lag of the S.
Anyway, keeping up with what??? All the rumors or do you have some official source that there is an 'e-turbo to compensate for lag on the S'? Exactly. You don't. So please stop with the 'keeping up'. Sheesh.
Until it's all official, no one really knows.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:20 PM
  #1789  
Ikone's Avatar
Ikone
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 2,377
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by black_frog
It's a big coincidence as I've gone from a 2022
GTS to a 2024 T and I think T feels much more agile and responsive! If you're all with specs and numbers, yeah you should go with the S or GTS or whatever.

The 992.2 S will come with the 48v motor, if you like it or not.
Good for you.

And I don't think I gave an opinion on the 48V, but glad you are responding to something that I didn't say.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:25 PM
  #1790  
DrKarlB's Avatar
DrKarlB
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 178
Likes: 169
Default

Originally Posted by TUD
FYI, the 997.2 engines were 3.6 and 3.8 while the 997.1 was 3.4 and 3.6.

The turbos are different between a base/T (smaller) and an S (larger). It is not just the ECU tuning. A C2S Coupe allocation is still one of the most desired as well as difficult to come by.
997.1 S was 3.8 and base was 3.6

I had an S... absolutely 3.8
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:26 PM
  #1791  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

Turbo lag isn't S-specific, it affects every car with a turbocharger.

And, like...of course they're doing this to improve turbo lag, dude. Why else would they do it? It's not like e-turbos are going to improve fuel economy, nor help the car make more power at the top end. The press releases from Borg Warner make a point of explaining that peak boost is achieved 50% sooner or something like that. By the seat of my pants, I'd guess it's going from about a second down to half a second.

This also aligns with the oldest rumors from Car & Driver, that there would be a "T-HEV" model. Turbo hybrid. Obviously C&D had the implementation completely wrong (shocker), but this rumor seems pretty well substantiated at this point. But sure, we'll see next week

edit: to be clear, they're only not doing this on the Base because of money. It's not because the standard Carrera has much less turbo lag or anything like that. It would benefit similarly from this treatment.

Last edited by zachr; May 22, 2024 at 09:35 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:41 PM
  #1792  
Ikone's Avatar
Ikone
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 2,377
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
Turbo lag isn't S-specific, it affects every car with a turbocharger.

And, like...of course they're doing this to improve turbo lag, dude. Why else would they do it? It's not like e-turbos are going to improve fuel economy, nor help the car make more power at the top end. The press releases from Borg Warner make a point of explaining that peak boost is achieved 50% sooner or something like that. By the seat of my pants, I'd guess it's going from about a second down to half a second.

This also aligns with the oldest rumors from Car & Driver, that there would be a "T-HEV" model. Turbo hybrid. Obviously C&D had the implementation completely wrong (shocker), but this rumor seems pretty well substantiated at this point. But sure, we'll see next week

edit: to be clear, they're only not doing this on the Base because of money. It's not because the standard Carrera has much less turbo lag or anything like that. It would benefit similarly from this treatment.
Okay, not trying to argue here, but....lol. jk.
Where are the numbers on lag? I've always wanted to see the numbers between the base, s turbos. I keep hearing about lag, but honestly, I'm not sure if what people are feeling is actually turbo lag. I used to drive a WRX. You wanna talk about lag.
I won't get numbers or stats, I'm sure, but there is a lot of anecdotal evidence and psychology playing a role here. We need some of these folks to do some blind tests. lol
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 09:54 PM
  #1793  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.

Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…

Last edited by zachr; May 22, 2024 at 09:59 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 10:10 PM
  #1794  
Ikone's Avatar
Ikone
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 2,377
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.

Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…
Ah. Okay, so the dongle gives you stats on the boost (tracking it)? This would be interesting to see from base, S, GTS.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 10:10 PM
  #1795  
RatherJaded's Avatar
RatherJaded
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 2,801
Default

Originally Posted by DrKarlB
997.1 S was 3.8 and base was 3.6

I had an S... absolutely 3.8

I still own a 997.2. I was confusing the 997.1 displacement with the prior 996.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 10:16 PM
  #1796  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Ikone
Ah. Okay, so the dongle gives you stats on the boost (tracking it)? This would be interesting to see from base, S, GTS.
Yes, though it’s not exactly automatic. You need the dongle connected to a PC with the logger configuration provided by the folks at M. For anyone looking to do this, I’m using the Time, Target Position Throttle, and Manifold Absolute Pressure columns, and calling it “peak boost” when MAP is within ~100 of the local maximum for the pull. The logs I’m looking at start around 4500rpm. I assume the lag would be much greater starting at, say, 2500rpm and locked in gear. That’s also the situation where e-turbos will make a huge difference.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 10:40 PM
  #1797  
22992's Avatar
22992
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1,020
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
I just realized that I do have some real data on this, via data logs from the M-Engineering dongle. Spot checking a few pulls, it is indeed about a second from stabbing the throttle to achieving full boost. It takes about half a second to get “close” (75% of ~peak), and another half second to get the rest of the way there with the M-Eng stage 2 tune on my GTS. I have no clue how much of that is programmed in versus being as fast as the turbo can manage to build the boost, but there’s some real data for you.

Maybe one day I’ll do a log on the stock map and see if the lag is comparable. If someone with a base carrera and the M dongle is willing to do their part, that might motivate me a bit more…
Very interesting. To me the car feels kinda like a 2 stroke, with a very recognizable
power band. I wouldn’t ever describe that as turbo lag, because when it is in its power band 5k plus It feels extremely linear. If you are at 3k rpm it’s a relative dog till the rpm climbs. Do you see a lag when going down the road in manual mode 5k + stab the throttle? Thats data I would like to see. Take the downshift and power band out of the equation.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 10:44 PM
  #1798  
Billy Bluejay's Avatar
Billy Bluejay
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 482
Likes: 275
From: Midwest
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
😂😂😂

You brag because you paid a 100k ADM. I brag because I paid MSRP. We are not the same.
I’ve never met someone who bragged about their large ADM. Only people who either lie about their ADM bc they are embarrassed, or just tell the truth like it is. You must hang out with some crappy people.
Reply
Old May 22, 2024 | 11:29 PM
  #1799  
shrimp money's Avatar
shrimp money
Nordschleife Master
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 5,927
Likes: 7,831
From: Ohio
Default

Good luck to anyone buying a hybrid Porsche. My ‘22 GTS now forget bass and treble settings everyday now after being fine for 6 months. Again.
Reply
Old May 23, 2024 | 12:16 AM
  #1800  
zachr's Avatar
zachr
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 949
Likes: 961
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by 22992
Very interesting. To me the car feels kinda like a 2 stroke, with a very recognizable
power band. I wouldn’t ever describe that as turbo lag, because when it is in its power band 5k plus It feels extremely linear. If you are at 3k rpm it’s a relative dog till the rpm climbs. Do you see a lag when going down the road in manual mode 5k + stab the throttle? Thats data I would like to see. Take the downshift and power band out of the equation.
The data I'm looking at is manual mode around 4500rpm, 3rd gear. The tune may add some lag, considering it needs to build to a higher peak boost. But I suspect it's not a huge amount of extra lag -- maybe another tenth of a second or two?
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:28 AM.