Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Nick Murray Video - S vs GTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2022, 03:51 PM
  #226  
Mmade992
Racer
 
Mmade992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 285
Received 256 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shrimp money
I only know of one person who paid $229k for a GTS that was $176k MSRP. He's probably not even on this board anymore, and that was in late April, early May. It was chalk with an aerokit.

The fact that you guys are so butthurt over my comment is funny. It was a play on other comments in this thread.
This thread is comic relief and sarcasm is loud and clear in your comments. Carry on!
The following users liked this post:
shrimp money (12-24-2022)
Old 12-24-2022, 04:23 PM
  #227  
Pivot
Burning Brakes
 
Pivot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: England
Posts: 1,067
Received 1,640 Likes on 601 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I'm not in the market for a 911 currently.

But if I was, and based on my current cars that I own, I think I would spec a T with nothing but MT, LWB and PCCBs (if/when available).

It would be my weekend car that I would toss around and couldn't care if it got dinged, whacked or whatever. Run it to the ground and get rid of it after the OEM warranty expires.

I think this is what people are getting at when they say they would pick a Base over a GTS or whatever, and money has nothing to do with it.

It's just use case.

A 175k MSRP 911 has no appeal for me. As the QPR just isn't there for me.


And this is exactly why I like to buy new Porsches, even if I have to wait few months longer 😜
Old 12-24-2022, 04:26 PM
  #228  
Pivot
Burning Brakes
 
Pivot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: England
Posts: 1,067
Received 1,640 Likes on 601 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shrimp money
I only know of one person who paid $229k for a GTS that was $176k MSRP. He's probably not even on this board anymore, and that was in late April, early May. It was chalk with an aerokit.

The fact that you guys are so butthurt over my comment is funny. It was a play on other comments in this thread.

Bring it on Shrimp , you are a funny man 😆
The following users liked this post:
shrimp money (12-24-2022)
Old 12-24-2022, 05:13 PM
  #229  
El Edmundo
Rennlist Member
 
El Edmundo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 105
Received 91 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Woofman
I assume that the "$700K car budget" comment is about my prior post in this thread. I mentioned that only to illustrate that some people (i.e. my wife and I) don't have a need to spend more money than necessary to buy more car than wanted which in this case is a nicely equipped base Carrara 4. Actually, if we follow through on the order when we get an allocation, the cost of the Carrara 4 will come out of my wife's reserve "car fund" - not that $700K. Having separate reserve funds for our vehicles is a holdover from the 13 years we lived together before we got married for financial reasons in 1991. When we finally married, we merged most of our other assets but my wife, who is a CPA, wanted to keep our reserves for vehicles separate because I was driving expensive cars while she preferred to drive small inexpensive cars. She budgets/allocates for expenditures and tracks every cent we spend. Everything is documented in Quicken. She's obsessive. How many people other that me are presented with an updated financial statement every weekday after the markets have closed? She's retired and nearing 75 but is still expending quite a lot of time and energy fulfilling requirements to maintain her CPA license "just in case" she needs to go back to paid work.

I didn't make it clear that the "$700K car budget" was for now and not annual. Just because she's OK with me spending a buttload of money doesn't mean that I'm going to. And I don't want to. I was surprised when she came up with that figure and suspected that she was trying to cheer me up due to how COVID has impacted us - hospitalizations, deaths and lingering illness among family and friends. But I'm just not that into cars anymore. Maybe it's age - I'll soon be 73. I had five/six cars at a time when younger but now I can barely tolerate dealing with two. I can appreciate cars without owning them. If I want a "fix" of exotic cars, I'll walk across the cul-de-sac to a neighbor's house and admire his Maserati collection while drinking his expensive wine. He appreciates the company.

My wife and I have always asked each other's permission before purchasing almost anything. We're a team. I asked my wife if it was OK to purchase a new $150 torque wrench when I bought the new Cayenne in August since my 50 year old torque wrench was not suitable for tightening Porsche lug nuts to 118 ft lbs. I asked her if it was OK to buy a $50 Porsche first aid kit from Suncoast last week. We're actually quite frugal. My wife has never got over a childhood in which her babysitting income went to purchase food which she never got enough of due to older brothers. I can't forget that there was a time when I couldn't find work and was down to my last $10. I still sometime have to assure my wife that it's OK for her to buy what she wants and that we can afford our favorite restaurants whenever we want.

I think my wife would enjoy a Carrara 4 but she's wavering on following through. Her main concern is that she would damage it or at a minimum trash its wheels on curbs. I've been reminding her that the 911 is smaller than her Prius wagon, that a 911 would have more parking aids, that she has a handicapped parking permit that usually allows parking in oversize spaces and that cars can be fixed if damaged. Although she won't admit it, it's obvious that she is "into" luxury car brands for whatever prestige she associates with them. I can visualize her telling friends that she drives a 911! It will be interesting to see what she says when we "get the call" that our 992 allocation has come up.

This thread is supposed to be about Nick Murray's video comparison of the 992 S and GTS. I like Nick's video content a lot and think he is very knowledgeable about Porsche but I don't always or even often agree with him. I want to scream every time he says "deviated stitching". F*ck "deviant" stitching! I pay more attention to what William and Albert say than to Nick.
Hey Woofman....... am so impressed with your comments and can relate to some of them. Most of all I love that you have laid out some very personal thoughts and feelings that show that you are a very reasoned, patient and understanding husband and man. You didn't need to explain yourself but you gave us insight about yourself on this forum that shows the brother/sisterhood that exists among most P-car owners
I wish I had more neighbors and friends around me like you. Drive on brother, Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays and a safe and healthy 2023 to you and your wife
The following 2 users liked this post by El Edmundo:
minn19 (12-24-2022), Smirnoff67 (12-24-2022)
Old 12-24-2022, 09:47 PM
  #230  
surquhar
Rennlist Member
 
surquhar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tampa
Posts: 264
Received 108 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I'm not in the market for a 911 currently.

But if I was, and based on my current cars that I own, I think I would spec a T with nothing but MT, LWB and PCCBs (if/when available).

It would be my weekend car that I would toss around and couldn't care if it got dinged, whacked or whatever. Run it to the ground and get rid of it after the OEM warranty expires.

I think this is what people are getting at when they say they would pick a Base over a GTS or whatever, and money has nothing to do with it.

It's just use case.

A 175k MSRP 911 has no appeal for me. As the QPR just isn't there for me.
You have said this exact same thing for years in every 911 generation forum.
The following users liked this post:
johny221 (12-24-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 01:23 AM
  #231  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,872
Likes: 0
Received 11,542 Likes on 5,065 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by surquhar
You have said this exact same thing for years in every 911 generation forum.
I've only had 991 and 992 911's.

And if I did say it, it was because it was true then, and true now.
Old 12-25-2022, 09:25 AM
  #232  
Vicbastige
Burning Brakes
 
Vicbastige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: behind the 8 ball
Posts: 831
Received 738 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I've only had 991 and 992 911's.

And if I did think it, it was because it was my opinion then, and my opinion now.
FIFY
The following 2 users liked this post by Vicbastige:
johny221 (12-25-2022), surquhar (12-25-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 11:00 AM
  #233  
Vicbastige
Burning Brakes
 
Vicbastige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: behind the 8 ball
Posts: 831
Received 738 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by srf409
This is an excellent post and from what I am assuming a true car guy that is not out to impress the status craving, badge worshipping, country club crowd looking to validate themselves.
The GTS is in most cases ridiculously overpriced and still quite stiff even at retail without the dealer rear end job.
I'm a neophyte here, but I think this S-GTS value comparison really depends on what options one finds important. When I configure a S with what I went with on my GTS build (as close as I could build the S to the GTS), there is roughly a $3000 difference between the two. Now I really don't care about badges or posing, but my thinking was I was personally happier with the GTS with it's *better* brakes, springs and arguably re-sale/trade value. I didn't buy my 911 with comfortable ride in mind so the difference there was less important to me. YMMV.
The following 3 users liked this post by Vicbastige:
Smirnoff67 (12-25-2022), Stespa (12-26-2022), TheGeneral (12-25-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 11:41 AM
  #234  
Pivot
Burning Brakes
 
Pivot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: England
Posts: 1,067
Received 1,640 Likes on 601 Posts
Default

I am firmly in the S corner, however, I do recognize that residual value is based on the derivative price, before the options. So, GTS would have more options baked into the price and will have higher residual for seemingly similar car. Except, I am buying for my personal motoring pleasure, not for resale, so back to 911 S. 🤓
The following users liked this post:
ron4sc (12-25-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 11:44 AM
  #235  
CanAutM3
Three Wheelin'
 
CanAutM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,542
Received 1,290 Likes on 603 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by srf409
This is an excellent post and from what I am assuming a true car guy that is not out to impress the status craving, badge worshipping, country club crowd looking to validate themselves.
The GTS is in most cases ridiculously overpriced and still quite stiff even at retail without the dealer rear end job.
Originally Posted by srf409
I tend to agree with you about getting more of the content that many of us enjoy with the GTS but would not pay the excessive gouge that some seem to be comfortable with and that has absolutely nothing to do with who can afford what which seems to be a primary concern for some in this thread.
I would personally prefer the GTS but understand that the S is really the sweet spot for most at this time.
This highly depends where one lives.

For some reason, Porsche USA decided to charge a greater premium for the GTS over the -S than is the case in most other markets. In the US, the GTS is priced 15.9% above the -S (base MSRP), wheres in Canada it is only 12.1% more (13.5% in Germany to state another example). Further, if you option an -S with all the options that are standard in the GTS (S-PASM, , PSE, Sport-Chrono, upgraded wheels, Sport Design package, Sport Seats+, ED taillight, PDSL+ headlights, GT steering wheel), they both end up essentially at the same price point in Canada and you get the extra GTS features such as the increased power, sportier suspension and bigger brakes for "free" plus the additional GTS optional possibilities (lightweight package, exclusive interiors). However, in the USA, one is left with a ~$4k premium after adding all these features to an -S. Now, if the extra power, sportier suspension, bigger brakes and additional option possibilities are worth ~4k for a US buyer, that entirely up to them. Furthermore, ADM are illegal where I live and are not a reality in many parts of the word.

Last edited by CanAutM3; 12-25-2022 at 11:53 AM.
The following users liked this post:
minn19 (12-25-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 12:21 PM
  #236  
Vicbastige
Burning Brakes
 
Vicbastige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: behind the 8 ball
Posts: 831
Received 738 Likes on 356 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CanAutM3
This highly depends where one lives.

For some reason, Porsche USA decided to charge a greater premium for the GTS over the -S than is the case in most other markets. In the US, the GTS is priced 15.9% above the -S (base MSRP), wheres in Canada it is only 12.1% more (13.5% in Germany to state another example). Further, if you option an -S with all the options that are standard in the GTS (S-PASM, , PSE, Sport-Chrono, upgraded wheels, Sport Design package, Sport Seats+, ED taillight, PDSL+ headlights, GT steering wheel), they both end up essentially at the same price point in Canada and you get the extra GTS features such as the increased power, sportier suspension and bigger brakes for "free" plus the additional GTS optional possibilities (lightweight package, exclusive interiors). However, in the USA, one is left with a ~$4k premium after adding all these features to an -S. Now, if the extra power, sportier suspension, bigger brakes and additional option possibilities are worth ~4k for a US buyer, that entirely up to them. Furthermore, ADM are illegal where I live and are not a reality in many parts of the word.

Precisely my perspective. About 3K-4K more gets you "better" brakes, suspension and badge along with the added possibility of enhanced trade-in/re-sale value. I don't purchase based on a resale strategy, but it isn't a bad thing. In the end, they are both fantastic models and no owner of either would be unhappy or miss the other. Had a .2 S before the GTS I have on order now and was for want of nothing other than something new.
The following 2 users liked this post by Vicbastige:
CanAutM3 (12-25-2022), Stespa (12-26-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 12:24 PM
  #237  
minn19
Rennlist Member
 
minn19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 903
Received 637 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CanAutM3
This highly depends where one lives.

For some reason, Porsche USA decided to charge a greater premium for the GTS over the -S than is the case in most other markets. In the US, the GTS is priced 15.9% above the -S (base MSRP), wheres in Canada it is only 12.1% more (13.5% in Germany to state another example). Further, if you option an -S with all the options that are standard in the GTS (S-PASM, , PSE, Sport-Chrono, upgraded wheels, Sport Design package, Sport Seats+, ED taillight, PDSL+ headlights, GT steering wheel), they both end up essentially at the same price point in Canada and you get the extra GTS features such as the increased power, sportier suspension and bigger brakes for "free" plus the additional GTS optional possibilities (lightweight package, exclusive interiors). However, in the USA, one is left with a ~$4k premium after adding all these features to an -S. Now, if the extra power, sportier suspension, bigger brakes and additional option possibilities are worth ~4k for a US buyer, that entirely up to them. Furthermore, ADM are illegal where I live and are not a reality in many parts of the word.
You obviously know my situation a little differently, but MSRP to MSRP I’d get a GTS. Unfortunately, with all of the craziness in the US market, the closest I could get when I was looking was around a 20k difference. Some were a little lower, but most were a lot higher (30k or more even) with builds all over the map. There were obviously a lot less to choose from in the used market compared to the number of S and 4Ss that were available.

So yah, 4k difference between similar S/GTS builds for me it is a no brainer to get a GTS (without CL wheels), 20k ish etc it was a no brainer for me the other way. Everyone is also obviously different on their value calculations.
The following users liked this post:
pkalhan (12-25-2022)
Old 12-25-2022, 01:46 PM
  #238  
CanAutM3
Three Wheelin'
 
CanAutM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,542
Received 1,290 Likes on 603 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by srf409
"ridiculously overpriced" WITH the 20K, 30K,.... gouge. That was the context.
Not what you said:

Originally Posted by srf409
The GTS is in most cases ridiculously overpriced and still quite stiff even at retail
Old 12-25-2022, 03:55 PM
  #239  
Smirnoff67
Pro
 
Smirnoff67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 603
Received 463 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vicbastige
Precisely my perspective. About 3K-4K more gets you "better" brakes, suspension and badge along with the added possibility of enhanced trade-in/re-sale value. I don't purchase based on a resale strategy, but it isn't a bad thing. In the end, they are both fantastic models and no owner of either would be unhappy or miss the other. Had a .2 S before the GTS I have on order now and was for want of nothing other than something new.
​​​​​​​I just took my first longer spirited drive in my new C4 GTS, but still keeping below 4,000 rpms, and had a blast. Don't know what the C2 S drives like but I'm very happy so far.
Old 12-25-2022, 04:13 PM
  #240  
Smirnoff67
Pro
 
Smirnoff67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 603
Received 463 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by srf409
Sounds good.
What is the suggested breakin period now?
First 1,875 miles/3,000km keep the revs under 4,000 rpm's. Preferably on longer drives. Shorter jaunts not so much.
The following users liked this post:
Pivot (12-25-2022)


Quick Reply: New Nick Murray Video - S vs GTS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:02 PM.