Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

911R Driving Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2017, 07:38 PM
  #256  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,233
Received 1,973 Likes on 917 Posts
Default

I do remember now chris Harris mentioning about pdk sucking drivetrain power. If try this is amazing that a car with same engine but with a manual, is faster. Would be a first and bodes well for 991.2 GT3 (assuming what we are assuming)
Old 01-11-2017, 04:07 PM
  #257  
Bartron
Racer
 
Bartron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NW Canadia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CAlexio
I do remember now chris Harris mentioning about pdk sucking drivetrain power. If try this is amazing that a car with same engine but with a manual, is faster. Would be a first and bodes well for 991.2 GT3 (assuming what we are assuming)
Besides the wider body and more aero slowing the RS down, as well as the extra weight of sound deadening, do we know if there is a gear ratio difference to make the car faster? I couldn't care less either way but interesting to think of the variables involved.
Old 01-11-2017, 06:06 PM
  #258  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,015
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bartron
...do we know if there is a gear ratio difference to make the car faster?
The gearing advantage should favor the RS for acceleration (7 ratios vs. 6 with similar top gears). 911R is 7 mph faster due to less drag (not gearing) - this means the RS is shedding quite a bit of effective horsepower through aero drag (and PDK friction which accounts for about 1 mph of the 7 mph difference). It takes a lot of hp to go 7 mph faster near 200 mph (unless I screwed up the math it's about 56 hp). And the loss due to PDK at top speed (if the 1mph loss of Vmax is accurate) is about 8 hp of the 56 hp total. Note: This 56 hp effective difference at 200 mph would be WAY smaller at normal legal speeds (the aero drag is proportional to the cube of the speed, so under 4 hp spent to overcome the extra drag at 100 mph).

I got the 1 mph difference based on the Vmax of the new GTS Manual being 193 mph and the PDK version of same car being 192 mph (though I thought I remembered a 2 mph difference for some models) - specs attached here:
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
gts_pdk.pdf (183.7 KB, 175 views)

Last edited by GrantG; 01-11-2017 at 07:02 PM.
Old 01-11-2017, 06:21 PM
  #259  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
The gearing advantage should favor the RS (7 ratios vs. 6 with similar top gears). 911R is 7 mph faster due to less drag (not gearing) - this means the RS is shedding quite a bit of horsepower through aero drag (and PDK friction which accounts for about 1 mph of the 7 mph difference). It takes a lot of hp to go 7 mph faster near 200 mph (unless I screwed up the math it's about 56 hp). And the loss due to PDK at top speed (if the 1mph loss of Vmax is accurate) is about 8 hp of the 56 hp total.

I got the 1 mph difference based on the Vmax of the new GTS Manual being 193 mph and the PDK version of same car being 192 mph (though I thought I remembered a 2 mph difference for some models).
Do they have the same final drive?
Old 01-11-2017, 06:24 PM
  #260  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,015
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
Do they have the same final drive?
The two cars have different gearing (partly because the RS has larger diameter 21" wheels and a slightly lower theoretical top speed), but both cars have gearing that is designed to maximize top speed - All GT models hit top speed in top gear very close to peak hp (8,250 rpm in this case) - the optimum conditions for Vmax). There could be a slight benefit to one car or the other, but it's small...

If I remember right, the RS has slightly lower gearing than the GT3 but after taking into account the bigger tires, it's something like 1% taller overall effectively geared than the GT3 (which goes faster than the RS, despite the 25hp deficit).

The RS's design purposely traded drag (and therefore top speed) for better downforce and higher cornering speeds.
Old 01-11-2017, 08:44 PM
  #261  
turbofreeFLAT6
Instructor
 
turbofreeFLAT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

911 GT gearing.pdf

Last edited by turbofreeFLAT6; 01-13-2017 at 02:25 AM. Reason: Corrected 996.2 ratios, addition of GT4 ratios, recalculation of speed in gear at 7,000 rpm using raw data, addition of max speed in gears
Old 01-11-2017, 09:50 PM
  #262  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,015
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting!
Old 01-11-2017, 09:57 PM
  #263  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbofreeFLAT6
These figures are from a variety of sources and contain some extrapolation on my part but I am reasonably confident they are accurate. In any case you can never be sure of what you read because in the course of compiling them it became evident that the official Porsche data sheet for the 911R contained the wrong final drive ratio!

Gears 1 to 6/7 and final drive:
Attachment 1125035

Mph at 7,000 rpm (includes effect of rear tyre diameters):
Attachment 1125036
Just a question. The 4litre has a shorter 6th gear but lower top speed than the 3.8RS?
Old 01-11-2017, 10:16 PM
  #264  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,015
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
Just a question. The 4litre has a shorter 6th gear but lower top speed than the 3.8RS?
No, the smaller number (gear ratio) makes for a taller gear. You're talking about 997 models, right?

Edit: I think maybe the speeds at 7,000 rpm may be swapped in the second chart (seems reversed from top chart) - I agree there might be a typo
Old 01-12-2017, 02:10 AM
  #265  
turbofreeFLAT6
Instructor
 
turbofreeFLAT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
No, the smaller number (gear ratio) makes for a taller gear. You're talking about 997 models, right?

Edit: I think maybe the speeds at 7,000 rpm may be swapped in the second chart (seems reversed from top chart) - I agree there might be a typo
You're right, they should be reversed. I'll check them all as soon as I have time.
Old 01-12-2017, 08:31 AM
  #266  
turbofreeFLAT6
Instructor
 
turbofreeFLAT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Now corrected. I have the speed at 7,000 rpm in 6th for the RS 3.8 but not the 4.0 so had calculated it from the relative ratios. However I had divided the 4.0's ratio by the 3.8's instead of the other way around.

I've also included the GT4's ratios. Their length compounds the power deficit relative to recent GT3s. 997 RS ratios in the first few gears would have helped give proper GT thrills without usurping Carrera power figures.
Old 01-12-2017, 09:28 AM
  #267  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,015
Received 4,941 Likes on 2,799 Posts
Default

Thank you! PM Sent...

Last edited by GrantG; 01-12-2017 at 12:53 PM.
Old 01-12-2017, 03:27 PM
  #268  
BusDriver
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BusDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 218
Received 222 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Due to its lighter weight (-50 kg), lower rotating masses (gearbox, wheels, etc), lower aero drag - the 911R accelerates quicker than the 991 GT3 RS in every gear. But because of the RS's launch control and much quicker gearshifts, the RS gets off the line about 0.5 sec quicker and makes up ground on the R at every gear shift. Therefore, in actual acceleration performance, the R has a sustained advantage only from 3rd gear or ~75 mph onwards.

With all that said, the RS and R serve different purposes and maximum acceleration is neither cars raison d'etre. If maximum acceleration is important, then the 911 Turbo is a better choice than either the RS or the R. If track performance and lap times are important, then the RS is the right choice. But, for ultimate road driving pleasure and if the concept of a modern day road-oriented hot-rod appeals to you - then the 911R is the car. Very fortunate to have one as there is nothing else like it.

Last edited by BusDriver; 01-12-2017 at 06:42 PM.
Old 01-12-2017, 03:50 PM
  #269  
Footsoldier
Burning Brakes
 
Footsoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As above ^ !
Old 01-12-2017, 03:54 PM
  #270  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,711
Received 625 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Besides a plaque, what is impressive about this car? And no I'm not a disgruntled RS owner. I just don't get the R. And yes I have a 997 GT manual car and a 73 Viper Green coming soon so I get a the allure of a manual.


Quick Reply: 911R Driving Impressions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:03 AM.