Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Consolidated 991RS thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:23 PM
  #6166  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 258 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSRRacer
The 991 RS won't come close to a 996 cup car. Even with the same tires a 996 cup would be marginally faster. By marginally I mean prob a second a lap.


It wouldn't keep up with a 997 cup for half a lap.
I based my comparo at Sebring.

Sebring, a .2RS on DOT R and LSD tires can lay down a 2:17.
The 9974.0RS can do a little better with the same tires and LSD.
Mid to high teens.

997.2CUP is able to do 2:05.
997.1CUP is slightly behind the .2CUP.

996 Cup is slightly behind 997.1 Cup and typically seen in the low to mid teens where the 997.2RS and 4.0L roam with DOT tires. Given slicks it would be same.

991RS on Sport Cups will be in the low to mid teens which is 996 Territory.
Given slicks the 991RS is right there with the 997.1Cup....

Now this is flat and level 17 turn sebring of course, and in a sprint race obviously the weight of the street car will take a toll on it..

But data is interesting none the less.
Old 03-04-2015, 03:28 PM
  #6167  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 705 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
Pete,

I think everyone here agrees and knows you've hit the bulls-eye with respect to, at least, the GT cars from Porsche.

And I'd imagine even the gang at the GT division in Porsche agree with you, but given the combination of government regulations and our legal system, it is simply is not feasible to build a Carrera GT 2.0.
I agree a CGT 2.0 is a step to far. Time waits for no man, and that time has passed. But "progress" is normally a continuum, a series of decisions, and recently they've chosen to take a jump. Or just as likely they were pushed...

I don't see 997 values slipping, suggesting in some ways that the market sees a high point, and that we're already on a down-slope towards 4wd electric self-driving bubbles. I'll keep looking for throwbacks (BMW 1M, 4.0, etc) left in the wake of this charge towards "progress" to pick up... as long as they make them.
Old 03-04-2015, 03:35 PM
  #6168  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,969
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
No. By this logic the ultimate track car is 4wd, because it's faster. It's mid-engine, because it's faster. The GT3 RS nowhere close to best, because it's not fastest. The GT-R is faster. The 918, ZR-1, Z06, Viper ACR, the list goes on... I don't want a GT car because it's fastest. If I did I'd buy something else. I want it because it's a balance of performance and feeling, of innovation and tradition. And I want it because it's involving and demanding. Did the Carrera GT scare Porsche more than it scared customers? I see the current generation of Porsche supercars is an over-reaction, a mandate from its overlords that Porsches will be easy to drive. And I think this is a mistake- it's not what Porsche is. Challenge is part of Porsche's identity. Speed is a given today, and you just need to look at Tesla's 3.0 second to 60 four door sedan to realize that next generation cars will be blindingly quick. For most faster + easier = progress, but that's not everyone. Some want the challenge. I'll try the GT4- I think it's a step in the right direction. But it's still watered down skim milk compared to what it could be, as is the new 3RS. I'm still waiting for the best bits of both cars (in either platform) for the full-fat experience. He're hoping the overlords will still allow this to happen.
Great summary! I can't agree more!
Old 03-04-2015, 03:43 PM
  #6169  
Mc11
Advanced
 
Mc11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 03-04-2015, 03:43 PM
  #6170  
PeteyDaddy
Racer
 
PeteyDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Bored on a conference call and just realized where they came up with the 2 special colors for the RS!

Name:  2015-03-04-14-42-36-1313461854.png
Views: 657
Size:  4.0 KB
Old 03-04-2015, 03:53 PM
  #6171  
mlpor
Instructor
 
mlpor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 202
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Has anyone got the actual bore & stroke dimensions for the 4.0 vs 3.8 liter GT3 motor to know where the additional 200cc comes from? Is the CR the same, or were changes also made to the head to keep the CR the same?
Old 03-04-2015, 03:54 PM
  #6172  
alaint101
Racer
 
alaint101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by aboodchy
What is that "PIT SPEED" button at 6:51 ?!
It allows you to set a maximum speed (you define it) to avoid going too fast in selected conditions.

You'd have to be pretty serious about racing to need this. A bit of a gimmick IMO.
Old 03-04-2015, 03:56 PM
  #6173  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 419 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by svb
Does the RS have the 991 Turbo rear fenders?
Kind of tired right now so I don't clearly remember if thay are aluminum or carbon.

If carbon I guess the answer is no.
Old 03-04-2015, 03:59 PM
  #6174  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 705 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mlpor
Has anyone got the actual bore & stroke dimensions for the 4.0 vs 3.8 liter GT3 motor to know where the additional 200cc comes from? Is the CR the same, or were changes also made to the head to keep the CR the same?
Compression ratio is nominally the same. I haven't seen bore and stroke in print yet, but bore remains unchanged at 102 mm while stroke is increased from 77.5 to 81.5- the same stroke dimension as in the original 3.6L 9A1 base 997 Carrera. I suspect the extra chamber volume came from the new pistons, but that's just a guess.
Old 03-04-2015, 04:01 PM
  #6175  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,588
Received 1,824 Likes on 948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kosmo
in the AP video at the 1min mark he says mesh grill underneath the fender can be taken off for race track.
what does that mean??
Interpreted this to mean there are screens under the vents to keep stone/debris from flying up thru the vent while on public roads, but which could be removed for track work to produce improved lift reduction (better airflow).
Old 03-04-2015, 04:03 PM
  #6176  
NateOZ
Race Car
 
NateOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 3,530
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alaint101
It allows you to set a maximum speed (you define it) to avoid going too fast in selected conditions.

You'd have to be pretty serious about racing to need this. A bit of a gimmick IMO.
I understood it to be a moving launch control as well, so it'll hold the engine in higher revs in addition to limited the speed? If that is the case, it's useful at my track given how they control entry and exits into the track.

If not, it's just a gimmick i'd rather not have.
Old 03-04-2015, 04:08 PM
  #6177  
GT3Bang
Advanced
 
GT3Bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petevb
Compression ratio is nominally the same. I haven't seen bore and stroke in print yet, but bore remains unchanged at 102 mm while stroke is increased from 77.5 to 81.5- the same stroke dimension as in the original 3.6L 9A1 base 997 Carrera. I suspect the extra chamber volume came from the new pistons, but that's just a guess.

Old 03-04-2015, 04:09 PM
  #6178  
kosmo
Race Director
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kobalt
Kind of tired right now so I don't clearly remember if thay are aluminum or carbon.

If carbon I guess the answer is no.
its been answered, not CF
Old 03-04-2015, 04:09 PM
  #6179  
rockitman
Nordschleife Master
 
rockitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Got Revs ???
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alaint101
It allows you to set a maximum speed (you define it) to avoid going too fast in selected conditions.

You'd have to be pretty serious about racing to need this. A bit of a gimmick IMO.
I will use it on the street for speed trap area's...set it and at a push of a button, you are going your desired speed.
Old 03-04-2015, 04:10 PM
  #6180  
kosmo
Race Director
 
kosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THE Republic
Posts: 10,594
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AC SATCO
Weird my Jeep Cherokee has this also, but for some odd reason they call it Cruise Control. Just so odd. Jeep says tomato, Porsche says Pit lane limiter. One sounds more expensive than the other, thats about the only difference.
right Pit Lane sounds soo much better than "1 touch cruise control"


Quick Reply: Consolidated 991RS thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:32 PM.