Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 vs 997?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2016, 08:26 PM
  #76  
caymannyc
Rennlist Member
 
caymannyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Glencoe, IL
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suitcase
Ok. I love 964s'. Possibly a good compromise in the argument of old v. new. I agree that the 991 is "big." But Porsche has no choice regarding emissions. Again, if big is a problem I really love the Boxster Spyder.
You know, I'm just curious now. We've seen people say Porsche has no choice but to make their cars bigger to meet the "market". They now sell more Macans than any other car by far. Macan sales alone beat 911 + Cayman + Boxster sales. Same for the Cayenne. So I have to wonder, with such great sales of the Macan and Cayenne (Panamera is tanking), why doesn't Porsche go out and make a small "pure" sports car? Something as small and tiny as the Lotus Evora or Elise?
Old 12-16-2016, 08:32 PM
  #77  
rodH
Rennlist Member
 
rodH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,264
Received 128 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suitcase

Ok. I love 964s'. Possibly a good compromise in the argument of old v. new. I agree that the 991 is "big." But Porsche has no choice regarding emissions.
I have yet to see a real good detailed explanation as to why all the companies are going to turbos and improving MPG. Yes, its good for the enviro, less gas, emissions, etc...BUT why can companies like Ford make a GT350? Why can Chevy make the Camero and Vette? Dodge make a hell cat? Non of these cars are turbo cars and have much larger displacement than the porsches. Why and who is twisting the arms of BMW for the M2/3/4, Porsche, Ferrari, etc...?

And I kind of agree with the person above that mentioned that, if this was the case, shouldn't cars be getting smaller, lighter and not larger and heavier? (Ironically it is the "big american muscle cars" that are getting smaller and lighter. Crazy that the 991 is longer than a Viper, who ever thought?)
Old 12-16-2016, 08:35 PM
  #78  
Mumbles
Drifting
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,652
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I know my P dealer would have almost nothing to service if it wasn't for the SUV's as 95% of the cars are off the road for Winter
Old 12-16-2016, 09:24 PM
  #79  
Para82
Race Car
 
Para82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bogota / Navarre Beach
Posts: 4,191
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodH


Feels just right to me too. But dang there is something about the R that looks so perfect and the GT3 is not hard on the eyes either.
The 991 GT3 is a beautiful car but I have zero interest in owning an automatic sports car. I also would fear owning one outside of warranty, it seems they have catastrophic engine issues. Again the halo for me is a 997.2 GT3...
Old 12-16-2016, 09:27 PM
  #80  
ATSR
Burning Brakes
 
ATSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 203 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Para82
The 991 GT3 is a beautiful car but I have zero interest in owning an automatic sports car. I also would fear owning one outside of warranty, it seems they have catastrophic engine issues. Again the halo for me is a 997.2 GT3...
+1

No automatic sports car for me either. I love the 911R but for the amount of money they are going for, I rather have a Singer.
Old 12-16-2016, 09:29 PM
  #81  
rodH
Rennlist Member
 
rodH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,264
Received 128 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Para82
The 991 GT3 is a beautiful car but I have zero interest in owning an automatic sports car. I also would fear owning one outside of warranty, it seems they have catastrophic engine issues. Again the halo for me is a 997.2 GT3...
I do agree with this, I was referring to the visual appeal. An auto, no matter how good, just takes too much away for what I want out of the car and my uses.
Old 12-16-2016, 09:51 PM
  #82  
voiceprint1
Burning Brakes
 
voiceprint1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,081
Received 132 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

these guys don't mind an automatic?

http://www.automobilemag.com/news/20...e-week-review/
Old 12-16-2016, 10:20 PM
  #83  
Hula
Burning Brakes
 
Hula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 755
Received 203 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rodH
I have yet to see a real good detailed explanation as to why all the companies are going to turbos and improving MPG. Yes, its good for the enviro, less gas, emissions, etc...BUT why can companies like Ford make a GT350? Why can Chevy make the Camero and Vette? Dodge make a hell cat? Non of these cars are turbo cars and have much larger displacement than the porsches. Why and who is twisting the arms of BMW for the M2/3/4, Porsche, Ferrari, etc...?
I'm afraid it involves math. Corporate Average Fuel Economy is just that. All of the cars sold under the corporate umbrella must meet a certain average. Ford can make the GT350 because it sells a lot of Fiestas. Audi and Lambo are under the VW umbrella. They can get away making V10 R8's and V12 Aventadors since they sell a lot of Jettas (I'm going to leave aside VW's recent purchase of Porsche).

But the standards are getting tighter. The shell game is getting tougher to work around. BMW had Mini to lower it's average but it wasn't enough hence the switch to turbos. One of the big motivators for automakers to offer all-electric options is to average down the CAFE.

There are other factors as well. For instance China is trying to clamp down on conspicuous consumption so they slapped down a tariff based on displacement. Tariffs start getting steep at 3.0 liters so Porsche made sure the 991.2 engine shrunk to 2.981 liters.

Last edited by Hula; 12-16-2016 at 11:29 PM. Reason: Cleanup
Old 12-16-2016, 10:27 PM
  #84  
KNS
Three Wheelin'
 
KNS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,545
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caymannyc
You know, I'm just curious now. We've seen people say Porsche has no choice but to make their cars bigger to meet the "market". They now sell more Macans than any other car by far. Macan sales alone beat 911 + Cayman + Boxster sales. Same for the Cayenne. So I have to wonder, with such great sales of the Macan and Cayenne (Panamera is tanking), why doesn't Porsche go out and make a small "pure" sports car? Something as small and tiny as the Lotus Evora or Elise?
It's not the market, it has to do with fuel economy and the size of the vehicle's track and wheelbase.

Starting in 2011, the CAFE standards are newly expressed as mathematical functions depending on vehicle footprint, a measure of vehicle size determined by multiplying the vehicle’s wheelbase by its average track width. A complicated 2011 mathematical formula was replaced starting in 2012 with a simpler inverse-linear formula with cutoff values. CAFE footprint requirements are set up such that a vehicle with a larger footprint has a lower fuel economy requirement than a vehicle with a smaller footprint.

Porsche really didn't have a choice if they were to offer a sports car with so much horsepower and still meet MPG requirements.

I hate it - I don't ever want to own such a gigantic (to me) 911.
Old 12-16-2016, 10:31 PM
  #85  
Suitcase
Racer
 
Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 397
Received 125 Likes on 39 Posts
Default Regulations

European CO2 volume ....Global warming Police.
Old 12-16-2016, 10:52 PM
  #86  
dbv1
Rennlist Member
 
dbv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 790
Received 131 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I'm with (most of you) guys. Don't want large, automatic, electric, comfort, GT. 997 is definitely big already. I don't mind them selling Cayennes and Macans at all, they are the best vehicles in their segments, but leave the 911 alone.

My dealer has one of those million dollar electric things in the show room (forgot the model designation). Nobody is ever looking at it. They also have a sweet black 930 SC that's always got someone looking at it (myself included).
Old 12-16-2016, 10:56 PM
  #87  
Fined
Three Wheelin'
 
Fined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,650
Received 207 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KNS
It's not the market, it has to do with fuel economy and the size of the vehicle's track and wheelbase.

Starting in 2011, the CAFE standards are newly expressed as mathematical functions depending on vehicle footprint, a measure of vehicle size determined by multiplying the vehicle’s wheelbase by its average track width. A complicated 2011 mathematical formula was replaced starting in 2012 with a simpler inverse-linear formula with cutoff values. CAFE footprint requirements are set up such that a vehicle with a larger footprint has a lower fuel economy requirement than a vehicle with a smaller footprint.

Porsche really didn't have a choice if they were to offer a sports car with so much horsepower and still meet MPG requirements.


*******the more you know*********

good info. did not know about that as a reasoning.
Old 12-17-2016, 12:38 AM
  #88  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,484
Received 1,028 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by caymannyc
I must be in the minority, since I think the 991 looks better from every angle other than the side!
This looks good? No matter how hard you work with the camera, you could never make a 997 look like a Panamera as much as this one.
Attached Images  
Old 12-17-2016, 02:23 AM
  #89  
caymannyc
Rennlist Member
 
caymannyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Glencoe, IL
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sandwedge
This looks good? No matter how hard you work with the camera, you could never make a 997 look like a Panamera as much as this one.
I consider that a "side" shot

When I say rear, I mean straight from the back.
Old 12-17-2016, 03:47 AM
  #90  
gasongasoff
Pro
 
gasongasoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California
Posts: 663
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Hold up. 89 posts and nobody mentioned how the 991 eliminated the turn-in understeer from the 997?


Quick Reply: 991 vs 997?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:12 PM.