2021 Delivery Date?
#1501
No. I live in a carb state (ct) and am delighted to have the benefit of reduced emissions, no matter how it might adversely affect the performance of my 992TTS or delay its delivery.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Says someone who just bought a brand new gasoline-powered 911...
The following 5 users liked this post by comis_hq:
atl1glf (11-22-2020),
couturegirl (11-20-2020),
markchristenson (11-20-2020),
Russian Mafia (11-22-2020),
SBAD (11-20-2020)
#1502
Burning Brakes
i traded in my 911.1 targa4S in March when I ordered my 992TTS (replacing my 991.1tts).
While I, like others, have been disappointed by delays and the Porsche information vacuum, I haven’t seen any evidence-based, rational good reason to be *angry* at PAG, PCNA, my dealer, EPA, CARB - or anyone else.
am I missing something that is evidence-based?
The following users liked this post:
dribar (11-20-2020)
#1503
Burning Brakes
No. I live in a carb state (ct) and am delighted to have the benefit of reduced emissions, no matter how it might adversely affect the performance of my 992TTS or delay its delivery.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
#1504
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 2,805
Received 2,659 Likes
on
1,251 Posts
For some reason this clip from the movie Zootopia came to mind.
The following 4 users liked this post by Bluehighways:
#1505
Three Wheelin'
No. I live in a carb state (ct) and am delighted to have the benefit of reduced emissions, no matter how it might adversely affect the performance of my 992TTS or delay its delivery.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Last edited by ryandarr1979; 11-20-2020 at 07:10 PM.
The following 8 users liked this post by ryandarr1979:
couturegirl (11-20-2020),
dgtarga (11-20-2020),
gohawks23 (11-20-2020),
iamwingman (11-20-2020),
mr965 (11-20-2020),
and 3 others liked this post.
#1506
Instructor
No. I live in a carb state (ct) and am delighted to have the benefit of reduced emissions, no matter how it might adversely affect the performance of my 992TTS or delay its delivery.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
The following 3 users liked this post by Babyray:
#1508
Racer
For some reason this clip from the movie Zootopia came to mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsSD...Ijj6g&index=26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsSD...Ijj6g&index=26
reminds me of Evan Almighty. Do you think God just gives you patience, or does he give you the opportunity to learn patience.
it’s hard for me and I’m not in a carb state... Hang in there guys.
#1509
Burning Brakes
sorry for the CARB delay folks, it is not fun
The following users liked this post:
dribar (11-20-2020)
#1510
No. I live in a carb state (ct) and am delighted to have the benefit of reduced emissions, no matter how it might adversely affect the performance of my 992TTS or delay its delivery.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
Apparently, given your views, you should move out of California now, rather than allowing EXISTING state rules to intrude on your right to own a car which violates the standards which your elected government (and their appointed experts) have developed and applied.
Why not register (and keep) your car in a non-CARB state so you and your car’s emissions can adversely impact health and mortality there?
To each their own - but why complain about the rules in the place you have knowingly chosen to live - whether or not you care about how our shared environment affects us collectively and will affect the health of your and others’ children or others you care about?
i myself am very happy owning a carb-compliant car which I hope will in the future enable PAG to continue to offer ice or ice-hybrid cars that have superb performance.
And you will have exactly the same car in your CARB state. Why wait 3 weeks and add another layer of red tape is the ridiculous part. Porsche is not going to make special CARB cars.
#1511
IF it even happens by 12/4. This is ridiculous bull**** and it's 100% Porsche's fault. They keep giving us dates, and then the dates move last minute. I'm so pissed I am seriously thinking of cancelling my order. The only reason I am not is because I traded in a car and would lose the Sales Tax credit. Had I known, I would have kept my car or sold it private party. I am pissed now.
In speaking with a few other car enthusiasts, CARB is notoriously slow and this happens to all the manufacturers.
Either way it still sucks to wait... we'll eventually get our cars and we'll forget about all of this nonsense.
The following users liked this post:
Russian Mafia (11-22-2020)
#1513
Burning Brakes
#1515
Burning Brakes
reasonable middle ground will best advance the interests of p-car/ice enthusiasts.
I am certainly expecting that my 992tts will be LOTS faster than any Prius or Tesla or bicycle but YOU are most welcome to yours.
Last edited by peterdouglas; 11-20-2020 at 07:44 PM.