Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stop Sale Campaign on 911 with Sport Chrono?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2020, 09:22 PM
  #76  
Phattymcgee
Rennlist Member
 
Phattymcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 343
Received 240 Likes on 135 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by garfunkle
EFF YEAH!
just arrived for pick up. She still got it on the back roads. I just love this platform. At this point I will always own a 911. With all the model variants I don’t see how you could get board with this platform like I did with M cars.

now for a nice putt putt ride home with the kid in the car.
The following 2 users liked this post by Phattymcgee:
ftc3 (02-12-2022), sr5959 (11-18-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 12:11 AM
  #77  
Upscale Audio
Rennlist Member
 
Upscale Audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,501
Received 1,092 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdamSanta85

There is no doubt in my mind that's what this is about. You don't prevent the sales of cars over a simple recall. This is big sh*t. What will we get? A payoff? Buyback? Software fix?

You guys watched the Netflix series Dirty Money? Three episodes are flat-out epic:

"Hard Nox" about Volkswagon....and it mentions there are other cheaters and why

"Payday" about race-car driver Scott Tucker

And one on Valeant Pharmaceuticals ....I forget the name of it.

The one on Volkswagon was crazy crazy crazy. It baffles me that they tried that hard to cheat.
Old 11-17-2020, 12:50 AM
  #78  
Harrisoncsolo
1st Gear
 
Harrisoncsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default Stop Sale: also Cayenne 2017 gts sports Chrono

Hi everyone, brand new to this forum. Found you because I was about to pick up CPO last Thursday from Ray Centena Porsche in New Jersey - 2017 CAYENNE GTS. They’ve been unable to give ANY information - but just said it was something to do with “sports chrono”.

still nothing 5 days later. They have my cash. Do you reckon I’ll ever get the car?
The following 3 users liked this post by Harrisoncsolo:
AdamSanta85 (11-17-2020), Redonkulous (11-30-2020), wg8221 (11-17-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 01:08 AM
  #79  
onthelookout
Advanced
 
onthelookout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Southern California
Posts: 78
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Harrisoncsolo
Hi everyone, brand new to this forum. Found you because I was about to pick up CPO last Thursday from Ray Centena Porsche in New Jersey - 2017 CAYENNE GTS. They’ve been unable to give ANY information - but just said it was something to do with “sports chrono”.

still nothing 5 days later. They have my cash. Do you reckon I’ll ever get the car?
The sales associate I spoke with couldn't provide much in terms of timing for a resolution given how new the mandate was (made reference to it being a legal matter), so I am assuming this might take some time to be worked through (purely an opinion and speculation at this stage based on the limited information).

Don't think I'll allow this to dissuade me from purchasing one of the affected models though..
The following users liked this post:
Harrisoncsolo (11-17-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 10:23 AM
  #80  
Upscale Audio
Rennlist Member
 
Upscale Audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,501
Received 1,092 Likes on 593 Posts
Default

Porsche Class Action Suit


This may shed some light of what may end up happening with our cars. It could be that Sports Plus will need new software installed to be legal. The question is as a purchaser of an affected car what are your rights? Were the Volkswagon owners that got buyback or any monetary consideration the ones that only bought the car new?

This is a Porsche forum somebody here must be an attorney!
The following 2 users liked this post by Upscale Audio:
BGLeduc (11-17-2020), Texas Porsche (11-18-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 10:37 AM
  #81  
AdamSanta85
Rennlist Member
 
AdamSanta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,709
Received 1,245 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

To the best of my knowledge you did not have to be the original owner to be a part of the VW buyback/cash payment.

Am I reading this right? Did VW really give people checks for 25-50% of the value of their Diesels?

https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/20...ners-get-facts

https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/30/...-dirty-diesel/

Last edited by AdamSanta85; 11-17-2020 at 10:42 AM.
Old 11-17-2020, 10:41 AM
  #82  
WJGreer
Racer
 
WJGreer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 376
Received 178 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marcnyc
I don't get it. Who cares about emissions on used cars that are at least 4-5 years old? To me, cars should only be recalled for safety issues. I wouldn't want the performance of the car to be altered because of this
...said every single owner of Audi A6 and Q7 TDIs in about 2015.
Old 11-17-2020, 10:53 AM
  #83  
Wrtflyr
Advanced
 
Wrtflyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Litchfield Park, Az
Posts: 93
Received 106 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AdamSanta85
To the best of my knowledge you did not have to be the original owner to be a part of the VW buyback/cash payment.

Am I reading this right? Did VW really give people checks for 25-50% of the value of their Diesels?

https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/20...ners-get-facts

https://www.autoblog.com/2016/06/30/...-dirty-diesel/
I was given $13,000 for my pain and suffering with my 2015 Cayenne Diesel! The money is real! They did a software update and I still have her!

Last edited by Wrtflyr; 11-17-2020 at 10:54 AM.
The following 7 users liked this post by Wrtflyr:
AdamSanta85 (11-17-2020), BGLeduc (11-17-2020), Class5Kayaker (11-18-2020), edirtaynine (11-17-2020), RobC4sX51 (11-22-2020), westcoastj (01-06-2021), zabuch (12-08-2021) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 11-17-2020, 10:58 AM
  #84  
AdamSanta85
Rennlist Member
 
AdamSanta85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,709
Received 1,245 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wrtflyr
I was given $13,000 for my pain and suffering with my 2015 Cayenne Diesel! The money is real! They did a software update and I still have her!
Plenty left over for an aftermarket tune
The following 2 users liked this post by AdamSanta85:
Wrtflyr (11-17-2020), zabuch (12-08-2021)
Old 11-17-2020, 12:46 PM
  #85  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,547
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Upscale Audio
For those with TL;DR syndrome: basis of lawsuit is that Porsches were less valuable at time of sale because they didn’t meet emission specifications. Thus that owners were “cheated” of “value.” It’s a suit justified by logic so twisted that only those with terminal jealousy - or lawyers - would possibly even try to follow it.

This is a crock. The people bringing that suit are not friends.

Anyone who owns a Porsche and now feel that they have been betrayed and cheated because Sport+ mode results in slightly more NOx in certain situations, then by all means they must immediately go to the local Toyota dealer and trade their 911 in on one or four Prius. They should get out of here and not let the door hit them in the a$$ on the way out.

Anyone who feels betrayed by Porsche over Sport+ mode but complains bitterly about auto-start/stop always being activated after restart is a hypocritical brainless idiot.

Anyone with a functioning brain should have realized that the Sport and Sport+ buttons were “defeat” devices from day one. From. Day. One.

The fundamental problem being that modern emissions regulations result in an situation where many features of “sports cars” result in illegality. Which features? Oh how about rev-matching shifts, 195° engine operating temperatures, throttle response modeled after a cable, flat-shifting, etc.

Why do you think AS/S always defaults to on as of the last few years? Why isn’t Sport+ setting retained through restarts?

The article suggests Porsche actually changed hardware for cars that were tested. We’ll see. This seems not credible. More credible is that the difference between software-controlled transmission strategy and “transmission” is being deliberately conflated for propaganda purposes.

References to DieselGate... VW owners were furious. But not so much at VW. They were furious that government was going to either require castration or prevent registration.



The following 9 users liked this post by worf928:
bh1cqx (11-17-2020), borivojc (01-01-2021), edirtaynine (11-17-2020), marcnyc (11-17-2020), myrr (11-17-2020), napguy (11-18-2020), SConn (11-17-2020), SFZ GT3 (11-17-2020), Texas Porsche (11-18-2020) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 11-17-2020, 12:54 PM
  #86  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,547
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Oh... one last thing: If you join the class for this suit make sure that you mention this immediately to all your other “car friends” at your next gathering.
Old 11-17-2020, 12:58 PM
  #87  
marcnyc
Instructor
 
marcnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 132
Received 44 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
For those with TL;DR syndrome: basis of lawsuit is that Porsches were less valuable at time of sale because they didn’t meet emission specifications. Thus that owners were “cheated” of “value.” It’s a suit justified by logic so twisted that only those with terminal jealousy - or lawyers - would possibly even try to follow it.

This is a crock. The people bringing that suit are not friends.

Anyone who owns a Porsche and now feel that they have been betrayed and cheated because Sport+ mode results in slightly more NOx in certain situations, then by all means they must immediately go to the local Toyota dealer and trade their 911 in on one or four Prius. They should get out of here and not let the door hit them in the a$$ on the way out.

Anyone who feels betrayed by Porsche over Sport+ mode but complains bitterly about auto-start/stop always being activated after restart is a hypocritical brainless idiot.

Anyone with a functioning brain should have realized that the Sport and Sport+ buttons were “defeat” devices from day one. From. Day. One.

The fundamental problem being that modern emissions regulations result in an situation where many features of “sports cars” result in illegality. Which features? Oh how about rev-matching shifts, 195° engine operating temperatures, throttle response modeled after a cable, flat-shifting, etc.

Why do you think AS/S always defaults to on as of the last few years? Why isn’t Sport+ setting retained through restarts?

The article suggests Porsche actually changed hardware for cars that were tested. We’ll see. This seems not credible. More credible is that the difference between software-controlled transmission strategy and “transmission” is being deliberately conflated for propaganda purposes.

References to DieselGate... VW owners were furious. But not so much at VW. They were furious that government was going to either require castration or prevent registration.
Agreed, this kind of behavior for a sports car owner is hard to understand. The litigious culture nowadays - esp. in the US - is out of control
The following 2 users liked this post by marcnyc:
Class5Kayaker (11-18-2020), edirtaynine (11-17-2020)
Old 11-17-2020, 01:30 PM
  #88  
pfan
Pro
 
pfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 561
Received 79 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Reading from the lawsuit, there is a report that Porsche installed longer gear ratios in test vehicles than those in production cars. If proven to be true, Porsche will undoubtedly be required to compensate buyers for their deception. (Not sure why apparently only cars with Sport Chrono are affected by the stop sale).
Old 11-17-2020, 01:46 PM
  #89  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,547
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,089 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pfan
Reading from the lawsuit, there is a report that Porsche installed longer gear ratios in test vehicles than those in production cars. If proven to be true,
Let's assume your reading of the allegation is correct. (I may, or may not, read it later.)

Porsche will undoubtedly be required to compensate buyers for their deception. (Not sure why apparently only cars with Sport Chrono are affected by the stop sale).
Why? What *damage* to buyers was caused? You can't just file a lawsuit because your feelings have been hurt. You must be able to prove damage has occurred and to be able to reasonably quantify the damage.

Now, if this goes the way of DieselGate the "damage" will be the direct result of government forcing either castration of the cars or preventing registration. But, make no mistake, as of now, no damage has been done to owners.


Last edited by worf928; 11-17-2020 at 01:48 PM.
Old 11-17-2020, 01:49 PM
  #90  
R N M
Racer
 
R N M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NY
Posts: 339
Received 269 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Its common sense that Sport or Sport+ will use more gas.
The buyers that don’t realize this probably would never engage those modes anyway.


Quick Reply: Stop Sale Campaign on 911 with Sport Chrono?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:49 PM.