Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

718 GTS 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2020, 02:25 AM
  #346  
volksjaeger
Rennlist Member
 
volksjaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 214
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gorro47
For me the problem is that for the price of a new gts 4.0 you can get the 981 gt4, so i just can´t decide if i want a new pcar or the 981 gt4
What will be faster th new gts 4.0 or the gt4 981?

What do you guys think?
Get the 981 GT4. You will get a car that looks more aggressive and sounds EPIC. The GTS 4.0L will be heavier, have the start/stop and cylinder deactivation BS and sound like Tom Jones with a ball gag and IMHO the 718 rear is fugly with that porsche billboard. It really comes down to whether you want to spec your own car or if you can find a 981 GT4 spec'd the way you want it.
Old 02-23-2020, 08:29 AM
  #347  
ldamelio
Rennlist Member
 
ldamelio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,460
Received 987 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Taking the thread in a slightly different direction. PCA blurb that comes in e-mail said that Porsche released the GTS 4.0 in response to the C8 Corvette and its performance to price ratio for the possibility of attracting potential C8 buyers with a larger NASP engine. I don't know - I still think not many would cross shop the two cars. The C8 remains 'faster' (0-60) and tackier (I was willing to give it a chance, it looked like crap when I saw it in person at the Philly auto show). I'm not trying to start another entire C8 thread - that's been beaten to death. Just curious if you guys think the GTS 4.0 was Porsche's answer to the C8. I don't.

Last edited by ldamelio; 02-23-2020 at 05:33 PM.
Old 02-23-2020, 10:06 AM
  #348  
Chester7
Racer
 
Chester7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 444
Received 166 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ldamelio
Just curious if you guys think the GTS 4.0 was Porsche's answer to the C8. I don't.
I don't either. PCA is biased and insular.
Old 02-23-2020, 10:16 AM
  #349  
JCviggen
Rennlist Member
 
JCviggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: EU
Posts: 1,621
Received 1,578 Likes on 606 Posts
Default

They were always going to stick the 4 liter in some other models. The C8 is of a completely different size and a dog with different tricks. It's also completely irrelevant in the rest of the world outside of NA.
The following users liked this post:
sonicworld (02-24-2020)
Old 02-24-2020, 05:33 PM
  #350  
Selo
Rennlist Member
 
Selo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

The above is all true, but Porsche would rather claim to be releasing a car as a response to a pos American V8 'roidmobile made of plastic with an automatic transmission than to admit they made a mistake and ruined a few years of sales by putting a 4 cyl turbo pos motor in an otherwise world-class sports car.
The following users liked this post:
sonicworld (02-25-2020)
Old 02-24-2020, 06:46 PM
  #351  
MidEngineRules
Burning Brakes
 
MidEngineRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,208
Received 257 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by volksjaeger
Get the 981 GT4. You will get a car that looks more aggressive and sounds EPIC. The GTS 4.0L will be heavier, have the start/stop and cylinder deactivation BS and sound like Tom Jones with a ball gag and IMHO the 718 rear is fugly with that porsche billboard. It really comes down to whether you want to spec your own car or if you can find a 981 GT4 spec'd the way you want it.
There are still some near new 981 GT4s out there. Trissl Sports Cars has 2 in stock right now. A 981 GT4 with a FVD tune and DSC Sport controller, a mere $3k, is "end of story" versus the vastly more expensive 4.0.
The following users liked this post:
Chester7 (02-25-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 08:11 AM
  #352  
ldamelio
Rennlist Member
 
ldamelio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,460
Received 987 Likes on 532 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Selo
The above is all true, but Porsche would rather claim to be releasing a car as a response to a pos American V8 'roidmobile made of plastic with an automatic transmission than to admit that they can fleece some retrogrouches who insist on naturally aspirated 6 over an efficient, equally powerful T4 in a world-class sports car.
Fixed it for you......................
The following 5 users liked this post by ldamelio:
CaymanMatt (02-25-2020), Chester7 (02-25-2020), michael818 (02-25-2020), Vgj (02-25-2020), X2Board (02-25-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 10:21 AM
  #353  
CaymanMatt
Racer
 
CaymanMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 374
Received 165 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ldamelio
Fixed it for you......................
I couldn't have said it better.
Thank you!
The following users liked this post:
michael818 (02-27-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 10:29 AM
  #354  
JSF101
Burning Brakes
 
JSF101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 986
Received 170 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ldamelio
Fixed it for you......................
the "efficient" part is highly questionable

my 2.9 Cayman routinely got over 30 mpg on the highway
Old 02-25-2020, 11:42 AM
  #355  
rzspyder
Rennlist Member
 
rzspyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 214
Received 132 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I often find it astonishing when folks defend the 4T.

Here is my story: I’m not an expert when it comes to performance cars. I had a Subaru BRZ as my first sports car and I did not know even the difference between turbo and NA. It just happened that I had accidentally bought an NA car. I liked the car a lot, and the response to throttle seemed immediate to me. After I got more into sports cars, I wanted something more. It was around the time that Porsche had moved to 4T for the Cayman S. I test drove one with the PDK and felt it lacked immediacy in response. I then test drove one with the manual and it felt much better but it was still not instant. It was good enough (or the feeling of buying a new Porsche got into my brain’s decision making) that I decided to move forward specially since my wife also liked the idea of buying a Porsche. Also, I could not afford a 911 and I like to always buy new cars.

After the honeymoon period with the car, and realizing I probably shouldn’t have spent north of $80k on a 4T car, things started to bother me. The final nail on the coffin was when my buddy bought a used 981 base with PDK and when I drove it, the throttle response felt much sharper than my Cayman S and reminded me of fun times with the BRZ. After that I could definitely always feel the lag. I always drove on 2nd or 3rd and was at around 14 mpg (primary city driving) but not that efficient.

At the end, I sold the car and I’m waiting on the delivery of my Spyder. In my opinion no compromises should be made when you buy a car, otherwise it will hunt you down the road.
The following 2 users liked this post by rzspyder:
MidEngineRules (02-26-2020), sonicworld (02-26-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 12:28 PM
  #356  
fantom
Racer
 
fantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Davie, FL
Posts: 381
Received 106 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rzspyder
I often find it astonishing when folks defend the 4T.
It's called confirmation bias, mixed in with worry about major depreciation hit when they sell.
Old 02-25-2020, 01:11 PM
  #357  
TopspeedPT
Racer
 
TopspeedPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
Received 121 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Old 02-25-2020, 01:13 PM
  #358  
unclemat
Pro
 
unclemat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 639
Received 371 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fantom
It's called confirmation bias, mixed in with worry about major depreciation hit when they sell.
Meh. I am about buy a 718 BGTS w/PDK. I spent few days in a base 718 PDK (w/PSE) and loved it. The turbo, the sound, everything in the package. I could probably wait and save some money, but I found a perfect config/color for a decent price (2018 CPO till 9/24 with 600 miles for $73k, MSRP $95k) so I decided to bite.

The car will join a diverse stable of cars. I own 2006 Elise Sport, 2013 CTS-V wagon (manual). I also have a 2015 Land Cruiser for overlanding, 2012 Tacoma TX Baja for truckish things. And 2019 i3 BEV for commuting. Technically the GTS will replace a modified 2005 Subaru Legacy GT wagon (also manual) that I still have and will sell soon. Technically as in 4-banger turbo.

See the pattern? Different tools for different things. I struggled with decision a bit because of all the sound hype and sure the NA flat-6 sounds nice when on boil. But I am afraid the new 4.0 will be anemic in typical driving and I do love the turbo, it's a riot on the street where I will be using mine. Also the new 4.0 does not seem to sound as nice as the 981's 3.8. But then the 3.8 is a non-starter due to the packaging. I don't care for GT4 nor Spyder and particularly I do not care for the long geared manual box in these cars.

For my NA fix with a manual, it's where my Elise comes in.
The following 3 users liked this post by unclemat:
Chester7 (02-25-2020), MotoJB (02-25-2020), X2Board (02-25-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 01:16 PM
  #359  
MotoJB
Three Wheelin'
 
MotoJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,797
Received 596 Likes on 335 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclemat
Meh. I am about buy a 718 BGTS w/PDK. I spent few days in a base 718 PDK (w/PSE) and loved it. The turbo, the sound, everything in the package. I could probably wait and save some money, but I found a perfect config/color for a decent price (2018 CPO till 9/24 with 600 miles for $73k, MSRP $95k) so I decided to bite.

The car will join a diverse stable of cars. I own 2006 Elise Sport, 2013 CTS-V wagon (manual). I also have a 2015 Land Cruiser for overlanding, 2012 Tacoma TX Baja for truckish things. And 2019 i3 for commuting. Technically the GTS will replace a modified 2005 Subaru Legacy GT wagon (also manual) that I still have and will sell soon. Technically as in 4-banger turbo.

See the pattern? Different tools for different things. I struggled with decision a bit because of all the sound hype and sure the NA flat-6 sounds nice when on boil. But I am afraid the new 4.0 will be anemic in typical driving and I do love the turbo, it's a riot on the street where I will be using mine. Also the new 4.0 does not seem to sound as nice as the 981's 3.8. But then the 3.8 is a non-starter due to the packaging. I don't care for GT4 nor Spyder and particularly I do not care for the long geared manual box in these cars.

For my NA fix with a manual, it's where my Elise comes in.
Then, go tune the 718 GTS T4 and enjoy it even more.
Old 02-25-2020, 01:21 PM
  #360  
CaymanMatt
Racer
 
CaymanMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 374
Received 165 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rzspyder
I often find it astonishing when folks defend the 4T.

Here is my story: I’m not an expert when it comes to performance cars. I had a Subaru BRZ as my first sports car and I did not know even the difference between turbo and NA. It just happened that I had accidentally bought an NA car. I liked the car a lot, and the response to throttle seemed immediate to me. After I got more into sports cars, I wanted something more. It was around the time that Porsche had moved to 4T for the Cayman S. I test drove one with the PDK and felt it lacked immediacy in response. I then test drove one with the manual and it felt much better but it was still not instant. It was good enough (or the feeling of buying a new Porsche got into my brain’s decision making) that I decided to move forward specially since my wife also liked the idea of buying a Porsche. Also, I could not afford a 911 and I like to always buy new cars.

After the honeymoon period with the car, and realizing I probably shouldn’t have spent north of $80k on a 4T car, things started to bother me. The final nail on the coffin was when my buddy bought a used 981 base with PDK and when I drove it, the throttle response felt much sharper than my Cayman S and reminded me of fun times with the BRZ. After that I could definitely always feel the lag. I always drove on 2nd or 3rd and was at around 14 mpg (primary city driving) but not that efficient.

At the end, I sold the car and I’m waiting on the delivery of my Spyder. In my opinion no compromises should be made when you buy a car, otherwise it will hunt you down the road.
Congratulations. You have done the right thing for your situation. If you view a 4-cylinder as inferior, then you'll always view that car as inferior.

I don't have that view. When we purchased our car in 2018 it was one of the best sports cars on the road at any price, and particularly for the price that we paid. My opinion hasn't changed since then. For that reason, I'm not bothered by what I paid for my speedy little T4 CGTS. So now there is a new car to drool over that has F6 & NA. That new car is capable of I believe all of 2mph on top of the 180mph our car is capable of. I'd be amazed if I ever got within 30mph or that top end. Acceleration? Pretty much a wash between the two. Efficiency? The ratings I see for the GTS 4.0 indicates owners can expect 22mpg at most while highway driving, considerably less around town or when winging it hard. My car gets me 26-27 mpg on the highway, also considerably less when pushed. Sure, that's low priority in a sports car but it's still reality. Sound? It's all in the ears. I've heard comparisons with the NA6 & T4. I personally think the T4 sounds better. It's a tenor rather than a soprano, a cello rather than a violin.

MOO & FWIW
The following 3 users liked this post by CaymanMatt:
BoxsirGTS18 (02-26-2020), ldamelio (02-25-2020), michael818 (02-26-2020)


Quick Reply: 718 GTS 4.0



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:26 PM.