Notices
View Poll Results: what do you think?
really clean, nice looking Vette....
174
31.46%
a very different Vette but we'll sure as hell take it.
165
29.84%
i'll be ordering one soon.......
98
17.72%
No thank you
116
20.98%
Voters: 553. You may not vote on this poll

Thoughts on the new corvette?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2019, 07:12 PM
  #1861  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Let's take the Cayman GT4. Or the Corvette C8. Where do you see they can save weight without getting into exotic materials like carbon fiber,magnesium or titanium? Believe me,if they could they would...they can't! Not when the market is demanding all the creature comforts,the safety equipment(most of which is mandatory),or the emission system which now requires heavy GPFs etc.
The lightweight car demand/market is not large, I admit. But that’s why there will be 35k fat Corvettes sold per year with all the creature comforts, two huge trunks for two golf bags, etc. Porsche can’t compete there. It should mass produce fat suv’s and panameras but refocus it’s sports cars to the much smaller yet high-margin and still profitable lightweight sports car niche, just like when it started.

Again, if Mazda and Alfa can do it, so can Porsche and 2x better than them. If I knew how it’s done, I’d be heading their r&d department. I don’t.
The following users liked this post:
GT3FZS (08-15-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 07:21 PM
  #1862  
K-A
Drifting
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 137 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by d00d
The torsional rigidity concerns me, but they could get serious and bring back the fixed roof on the Z06 since it's geared towards track use.
Also wish that engine to be a NA version of the Blackwing.

I didn't like any Vette after my C4 until the C7, and the ones in between haven't aged gracefully to my eyes.
Since I initially disliked the C7 rear, but now think it's acceptable, maybe the C8 look will grow on me as well.

GM could have done much better with the rear if they didn't feel the need to accommodate golf clubs.
<any George Carlin golf joke here>
That was the first thing I saw was the wide and flat expanse, Testarossa like, where instead they could have elegantly tucked the corners in.
Seems a infrequent use played an out sized role in their feature list.
Do Millennials even golf?
My GT4's passenger seat is fine with carrying golf clubs, and just take two cars when you're going to the course with another person.
Seriously. They say they want to move on from Boomers, but they created the whole rear around being able to fit not one big TWO sets of golf clubs (did they say two?)? Who won’t buy a mid engine sports car because it doesn’t have ample space for golf clubs? The rear is now overly squared and engine access is clearly massively limited (e.g higher labor costs). All for golf clubs.

Also, that’s the reason it doesn’t have those truly exotic mid engine rears where the entire upper bumper is a mesh screen for extra cooling.

To elaborate again on the rigidity. It should be concerning. People comparing this to older Caymans with less than 300 HP while at the salt time stating how the C8 has supercar performance aren’t aware that they’re making the case as to how big an issue it is. A car that can generate the g forces on to a chassis like the C8 can, needs something far stiffer than a chassis with one of the least rigid torsional figures on the market today.

Old 07-29-2019, 07:29 PM
  #1863  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 200 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Yet, in other news the first year production is nearly sold out ....
Old 07-29-2019, 07:35 PM
  #1864  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,689
Received 280 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
you will not see a regular production car under 3000 LBS
My GT4 is 3,080 lbs and dropping.

Originally Posted by neanicu
AP even had the ***** to tell us leather interiors are lighter than plastic ones
This is plausible.
The standard dash is injection molded vinyl over a styrofoam buck, the leather dash is glued to a styrofoam buck as well.
A square inch of thick vinyl could be heavier than a square inch of leather.
Old 07-29-2019, 07:57 PM
  #1865  
2slow2speed
Pro
 
2slow2speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 512
Received 108 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
Seriously. They say they want to move on from Boomers, but they created the whole rear around being able to fit not one big TWO sets of golf clubs (did they say two?)? Who won’t buy a mid engine sports car because it doesn’t have ample space for golf clubs? The rear is now overly squared and engine access is clearly massively limited (e.g higher labor costs). All for golf clubs.

Also, that’s the reason it doesn’t have those truly exotic mid engine rears where the entire upper bumper is a mesh screen for extra cooling.

To elaborate again on the rigidity. It should be concerning. People comparing this to older Caymans with less than 300 HP while at the salt time stating how the C8 has supercar performance aren’t aware that they’re making the case as to how big an issue it is. A car that can generate the g forces on to a chassis like the C8 can, needs something far stiffer than a chassis with one of the least rigid torsional figures on the market today.
Originally Posted by K-A
Seriously. They say they want to move on from Boomers, but they created the whole rear around being able to fit not one big TWO sets of golf clubs (did they say two?)? Who won’t buy a mid engine sports car because it doesn’t have ample space for golf clubs? The rear is now overly squared and engine access is clearly massively limited (e.g higher labor costs). All for golf clubs.
Have you actually read any of the presentations or seen any videos?

Where are you supposed to store the Targa top?

Have you actually done any HPDE's? People who track carry tons of crap, tools, helmets, ice coolers, EZ up, chairs etc. Every bit of extra storage helps, why do you think people like the Cayman a lot more than the 991 in regards to practicality? Because it has a rear hatch and a frunk...

In regards to accessing the engine, tell me what you need to do on a 991/992 to do an oil change, tell me what you need to do on a Boxster/Cayman to do an oil change.

The engine is a NA engine, all other exotics that have those meshes are forced induction cars...Forced induction, extra heat generated, needs venting.. Guess you don't know that either

Do a 5mph bumper to bumper on those mesh rears and see what happens and how big of a bill you end up with.

Originally Posted by K-A
To elaborate again on the rigidity. It should be concerning. People comparing this to older Caymans with less than 300 HP while at the salt time stating how the C8 has supercar performance aren’t aware that they’re making the case as to how big an issue it is. A car that can generate the g forces on to a chassis like the C8 can, needs something far stiffer than a chassis with one of the least rigid torsional figures on the market today.
You keep ignoring the fact that a 911 cabriolet has less torsional rigidity than the C8 is projected to have. Compare apple to apples.

Does the Speedster have the same torsional rigidity of the GT3's? Does a TurboS Cabriolet have the same or more torsional rigidity than a GT3? By your logic no one should be purchasing those either....
The following users liked this post:
Nm2far (07-29-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 08:30 PM
  #1866  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,689
Received 280 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2slow2speed
Where are you supposed to store the Targa top?
They could have designed the C8 coupe with a fixed roof, with open air enthusiasts welcome to buy the convertible.
I had the top off of my C4 just once, when my daughter asked.
The following 2 users liked this post by d00d:
2slow2speed (07-29-2019), GT3FZS (08-15-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 08:42 PM
  #1867  
Caustic
Rennlist Member
 
Caustic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 113
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

This whole torsional rigidity thing got me curious. After googling for a while, I keep seeing the same list pop up. But I cam across another article about the 911 Targa that was interesting:

https://driving.ca/porsche/911/revie...sche-911-targa

latest Targa is 13,200 N-m
991 cabrio is 12,000 N-m

The C8 should be around 15,500 N-m based on what GM is currently saying.

But any way you look at it, I wish the new C8 had a hard top option. Maybe the Z06 and Grand Sport will go that way, but I have a feeling they won't. Kind of a bummer.
The following 3 users liked this post by Caustic:
2slow2speed (07-29-2019), GT3FZS (08-15-2019), Nm2far (07-29-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 08:43 PM
  #1868  
2slow2speed
Pro
 
2slow2speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 512
Received 108 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by d00d
They could have designed the C8 coupe with a fixed roof, with open air enthusiasts welcome to buy the convertible.
I had the top off of my C4 just once, when my daughter asked.
I also prefer the coupe over a targa top. My 97 NSX was a targa top, only took it off once to see how it worked, horrible cowl shake, went right back on never to be taken off again. At least on the NSX the T top was structural, don't think that is the case on the C8 but I could be wrong.
Old 07-29-2019, 08:56 PM
  #1869  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

List of torsional rigidities:

http://youwheel.com/home/2016/06/20/...ehensive-list/

My 987 Boxster wasn't on the list but I found it's 16,000Nm/deg which is impressive for a 15yr old roadster. I think I remember reading that it was the most rigid roadster/convertible of its time.
The following 2 users liked this post by hf1:
GT3FZS (08-15-2019), JHW911 (07-31-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 08:59 PM
  #1870  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 200 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
List of torsional rigidities:

http://youwheel.com/home/2016/06/20/...ehensive-list/

My 987 Boxster wasn't on the list but I found it's 16,000Nm/deg which is impressive for a 15yr old roadster.


Looks like one of the best options is this:

Name:  photo475.jpg
Views: 309
Size:  89.4 KB

Enough rigidity to make anyone happy here ...
Old 07-29-2019, 09:03 PM
  #1871  
eltoshan
Advanced
 
eltoshan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 67
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

What's with the big hang up on torsional rigidity? 20% softer didn't make the C7 any less of the track monsters that they are. Low torsional rigidity also didn't make Boxsters bad sports cars.
Old 07-29-2019, 09:04 PM
  #1872  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Yet, in other news the first year production is nearly sold out ....

Yep about as I expected - but that puts me in Year 2

GM / Chevy isn't going to have a bunch of game playing and ADM on these cars. Will it happen some - sure. But they want to SELL these cars and it looks as if they are going to do just that.
Old 07-29-2019, 09:11 PM
  #1873  
TexasRider
Late Porkchops
Rennlist Member
 
TexasRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 12,573
Received 97 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eltoshan
What's with the big hang up on torsional rigidity? 20% softer didn't make the C7 any less of the track monsters that they are. Low torsional rigidity also didn't make Boxsters bad sports cars.
Meh - they are trying to equate rigidity with safety. While there is some of that , accidents are unique. If a RanchHand solid steel bumper on the front of a 6000 lb F350 goes through the aluminum door and the window of a 3000 lb sports car then rigidity will be pretty much all that is left in that cabin. IMO It's best to use that handling and power to stay safe. They are all strong to a point and then things go bad fast. Thats a reason not to have too many inexperienced drivers in these cars.

I like the hardtop coupes too as indicated by the fact that I never had a convertible or a cabriolet of any description.

But in the Corvette they use that available open top as a standard feature. Some want it and some don't. I could see me taking the tops off a few times but mostly that would be no.
Old 07-29-2019, 09:21 PM
  #1874  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,301 Likes on 886 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eltoshan
What's with the big hang up on torsional rigidity? 20% softer didn't make the C7 any less of the track monsters that they are. Low torsional rigidity also didn't make Boxsters bad sports cars.
I don't understand why it matters for a mid- or rear-engine car. The chassis sees no driveline torque, at least not like it does with a front-engine configuration where the engine mounts are at the other end of the car from the driven wheels.

Just make it not squeak and rattle too much and we're good, kthxbye.
Old 07-29-2019, 09:44 PM
  #1875  
Caustic
Rennlist Member
 
Caustic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 113
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eltoshan
What's with the big hang up on torsional rigidity? 20% softer didn't make the C7 any less of the track monsters that they are. Low torsional rigidity also didn't make Boxsters bad sports cars.
Originally Posted by Noah Fect
I don't understand why it matters for a mid- or rear-engine car. The chassis sees no driveline torque, at least not like it does with a front-engine configuration where the engine mounts are at the other end of the car from the driven wheels.

Just make it not squeak and rattle too much and we're good, kthxbye.
You all are probably right, whatever flex there might be will be barely perceptible at the level the C8 will be at. But I think that people feel it's not quite the best it could possibly be. Heres to hoping the Z06 and GS have a hard top!


Quick Reply: Thoughts on the new corvette?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:00 PM.