Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2005, 04:52 PM
  #301  
Dknebes
Rennlist Member
 
Dknebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jean,
I just tried the link and it worked. He did the run with street tires and from the video was short shifting. Your right, the time should be lower but he is new to this power and has alot to learn. My car is set up for street as well as some weekend DE events. I run it at 15psi of boost but it still is a handful to drive. If I would have known more when I started I would have started with the much better platform that the 993tt has to offer. I never thought I would get bit by the hp bug and not know when enough is enough.
Old 08-08-2005, 04:53 PM
  #302  
Dknebes
Rennlist Member
 
Dknebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will talk to the 993tt guy about running 60mph to 130mph.
Old 08-08-2005, 05:44 PM
  #303  
poorb0yw
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
poorb0yw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

David,
Happy to see the Tilton setup worked out for you (holding power and drivability). I think the last time we spoke you were just about to have it installed.
Old 08-08-2005, 07:11 PM
  #304  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Marty, if I get a chance to bring it down this fall you will get your wish.
Mark might be interested in joining us and we could check out the back 40 west of Minneapolis.

Regarding times, I believe my car should do better than the R&T tested unit in the 60-130 range as the gears are more aggressive in my car than what RUF uses. RUF gears have more focus on top speed that outright acceleration. I am hoping to break into the low 7's if not better.

I spoke and emailed my data to Race Technology in the UK and they were quite helpful with procedure and had some good sugestions.

I may try to do a few runs tonight if all is right.

LAT
Old 08-08-2005, 07:55 PM
  #305  
Dknebes
Rennlist Member
 
Dknebes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Princeton,
I had a number of problems with the install, most were because people did not follow directions on the install and the fact that I have an 89 with it own flywheel for that year. The clutch also seems to work better in the 993 with its master cylinder setup. My engagement distance is smaller and takes some getting use to. This clutch takes anything that you can throw at it. I ran my car at Sebring and the clutch was flawless with the light flywheel and clutch it made the down shifts very fast.
Old 08-09-2005, 02:19 AM
  #306  
nman413
Drifting
 
nman413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CP, Bonneville Salt Flats...

Let's go. I'm itching for a road trip.
Old 08-09-2005, 02:21 AM
  #307  
CP
Race Director
 
CP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 15,121
Received 334 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by icerbofh
CP, Bonneville Salt Flats...

Let's go. I'm itching for a road trip.
Jauder,

It's probably 120 degrees there now. Not to mention mu RUF is still in Santa Rosa......

I thought you're ona aroad trip......to Japan.

CP
Old 08-09-2005, 02:28 AM
  #308  
nman413
Drifting
 
nman413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's no road to Japan

I'm leaving this Friday for Japan, back in a week or so then I'm thinking about taking an extended road trip to some national parks. Just got back from 2 days in Big Sur, nice country side, lousy weather for the most part and I still managed to get sunburnt.
Old 08-09-2005, 12:05 PM
  #309  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Still dealing with Race Technology on figuring out what is up with my XA/22.

The XA/22 as a tuning tool.
The horsepower calculations are very interesting to view. Not just for the raw numbers which in 5th gear were 207 for my C4 and 510 forthe RUF but also for the fact I can see a dip in the 4th gear orsepower curve at about the higher rpm range which I suspect to be knock sensors doing their thing. I am going to back off boost a little and see if I can get a smooth acceleration curve. 1st through 3rd are very clean. One more thing the seat of my pants isn't sensitive enough for.

RGDS
Old 08-09-2005, 01:31 PM
  #310  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LAT
... Not just for the raw numbers which in 5th gear were 207 for my C4 and 510 forthe RUF
LAT based on these numbers, if the stock C4 is 282hp, the reading is off by around 40% or so, which would then put your CTR2 at 700+ HP, Ithink you might want to share this also with Racetech, it might give them a hint on what is wrong.
Old 08-09-2005, 02:40 PM
  #311  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jean, I agree with your analysis and it is because of this that I have emailed the data files to RT to review and we are working together to get to the bottom of the problem.

BTW. I will be doing the same tests for my bone stock 2004 530i to see what I get for results. If you like I can share these
Old 08-09-2005, 02:47 PM
  #312  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LAT
BTW. I will be doing the same tests for my bone stock 2004 530i to see what I get for results. If you like I can share these
Anything goes! I am inviting people from all boards, not much response though, especially from the 996 crowd except for rmrmrd I think.
Please fix the AX before posting BMW times here, or you will create a riot
Old 08-09-2005, 06:43 PM
  #313  
BuddyG
Burning Brakes
 
BuddyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,099
Received 240 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
Anything goes! I am inviting people from all boards, not much response though, especially from the 996 crowd except for rmrmrd I think.
Please fix the AX before posting BMW times here, or you will create a riot
Need a page with a list of the cars and the times. I will post one when I get my car hopefully will have it this Friday!

Check this thread:

http://6speedonline.com/forums/showt...threadid=31504

Old 08-09-2005, 10:06 PM
  #314  
BuddyG
Burning Brakes
 
BuddyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,099
Received 240 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
!) I just don't believe the speedos are anything like accurate, particularly at the higher end.
Isn't that one of the major problems with this test,that the Porsche speedo is usually optimistic. So while you can test between Porsche's wouldn't it be different with a different manufacturer or even between different speedo's in Porsche's?

Just wondering?
Old 08-09-2005, 10:46 PM
  #315  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BuddyG
Isn't that one of the major problems with this test,that the Porsche speedo is usually optimistic. So while you can test between Porsche's wouldn't it be different with a different manufacturer or even between different speedo's in Porsche's?

Just wondering?
The Porsche speedos are pretty accurate in the 60 to 130 range (usually +/- 2 or 3 MPH) assuming you have the factory-recommended tire sizes and stock gearing. You can also check it against the tach. See the back of your Owner's Manual for RPM vs vehicle speed.


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:02 PM.