Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 Cobb Accessport, post your results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2020, 09:02 AM
  #346  
polobai
Drifting
 
polobai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Jupiter FL
Posts: 2,845
Received 1,125 Likes on 670 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fsmich
I agree World puts out some optimistic numbers. Dyno's are for tuning and documenting mod improvements.
With that in mind, Mitch has my car with mods putting out 107whp (taking in account your 10% correction) more than a stock GTS, or 157 corrected whp more than a base. All same dyno minus 10% on 91oct.
What we really need are some roll race numbers (60-130) and 1/4 mile traps. Mine are real close to a 991.2 Turbo S And the 600LT on the straights yesterday (track map).
You should trap into the 130 mph range with your setup! Nice work, have fun with it!
Old 04-05-2020, 01:57 PM
  #347  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,809
Received 593 Likes on 401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by polobai
You should trap into the 130 mph range with your setup! Nice work, have fun with it!
fsmich has already tested it and it does trap 130mph
https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1077...l#post16256026
Old 05-03-2020, 07:04 PM
  #348  
Porschex3
Advanced
 
Porschex3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Southeast US
Posts: 88
Received 48 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

My car went in to the dealer for a checkup a few weeks ago, so I had “unloaded” the Cobb tune on my C2. I’ve been driving it around without the tune ever since. I loaded it back (Stage 1 93) earlier today and just went out for a nice Sunday afternoon, sunny, windows down drive. Man, the Cobb tune really makes the car a load of fun to drive. Without the tune it is fun, but with the tune it is REALLY fun. I’m not sure what the difference between stock and tune feels like on an S or GTS, but it makes a world of difference on the C2 (and, I would guess, the T). Highly recommended.
Old 05-04-2020, 09:32 AM
  #349  
Aatish
Rennlist Member
 
Aatish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: BOS/LGA/ORD
Posts: 693
Received 86 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Update!

I flashed stage 2 93 on my car earlier last week (Stock cats, X-Pipe, stock filter).
Car has around 150 miles on it since flashing; a lot more power than stock. No issues with drivability. I have been driving hard to set adaptations correctly post flash, seems to be handling stage 2 just fine.

I have baseline dragy (0-60 and 60-130) figures ready to go. I will be post a comparison to stage 2 figures once I get a chance to collect some data.
The following users liked this post:
NightBlueTTS (05-04-2020)
Old 05-04-2020, 02:14 PM
  #350  
B Russ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
B Russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 91North/75South
Posts: 2,517
Received 857 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Went back to stage 1 93 today, Just felt best for my car
Old 05-04-2020, 03:26 PM
  #351  
rad_911
Track Day
 
rad_911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 19
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by B Russ
Went back to stage 1 93 today, Just felt best for my car
You have a C4S with PSE and soul cats, right?

Stage 2 felt slower? Or you're worried it's too aggressive?

I'll be adding soul cats to my C2S soon, so I'm curious.
Old 05-04-2020, 03:28 PM
  #352  
LargePuppy
Rennlist Member
 
LargePuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Diego
Posts: 831
Received 344 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Definitely could not have felt slower than Stage 1, but understandable if the belief is too aggressive.

Originally Posted by rad_911
You have a C4S with PSE and soul cats, right?

Stage 2 felt slower? Or you're worried it's too aggressive?

I'll be adding soul cats to my C2S soon, so I'm curious.
Old 05-04-2020, 04:15 PM
  #353  
B Russ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
B Russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 91North/75South
Posts: 2,517
Received 857 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

No it just didnt feel as smooth as stage 1, You know when things just feel right?/ stage 1 did

Last edited by B Russ; 05-04-2020 at 10:26 PM.
The following users liked this post:
The Ox (05-04-2020)
Old 05-04-2020, 06:47 PM
  #354  
luv2sleep
Burning Brakes
 
luv2sleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,089
Received 301 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

I finally have my GTS dialed in the way I like it. I have a semi custom COBB stage 2 and PDK tune...semi custom meaning tweaked by the kind folks at COBB through providing them a few data logs. The PDK tune is a nice complement to the ECU tune IMO. My other mods include high flow cats, headers, and BMC air filter. I also use an octane booster from BND Automotive which I’ve been using for a while on other cars. My GTS has transformed into a 2 pronged beast on steroids. I could not be happier.
The following 2 users liked this post by luv2sleep:
LWG (06-08-2020), The Ox (05-04-2020)
Old 05-09-2020, 05:29 PM
  #355  
Robdokwon
Rennlist Member
 
Robdokwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 72
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I've been running Cobb stage 1 93 on my 17' C2 w/PDK and Soul exhaust, stock cats. Put about 600 miles on the tune so far. Really enjoying it, there's a lot more turbo acceleration but I still swear there's more lag as I dip into the throttle than stock. Whatever. Question: anyone use VP Racing's "Maddative Octanium Unleaded" octane booster WITH their Cobb tune? It supposedly raises the octane by 7 numbers (so 100 if you run 93 from the pump). Does that require a new map from the Cobb AP? Also, there's some rumors on the internet about racing gas sitting in your fuel tank (when your car is not in use for a while) causing damage to parts of your fuel line and system - is that just for the pure race gas 102 stuff or does it include octane-boosted gas as well?
Old 05-09-2020, 05:51 PM
  #356  
B Russ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
B Russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 91North/75South
Posts: 2,517
Received 857 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Personal opinion, dont bother messing with that racing gas chit
Old 05-09-2020, 05:57 PM
  #357  
thesaintusa
Rennlist Member
 
thesaintusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,266
Received 373 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robdokwon
I've been running Cobb stage 1 93 on my 17' C2 w/PDK and Soul exhaust, stock cats. Put about 600 miles on the tune so far. Really enjoying it, there's a lot more turbo acceleration but I still swear there's more lag as I dip into the throttle than stock. Whatever. Question: anyone use VP Racing's "Maddative Octanium Unleaded" octane booster WITH their Cobb tune? It supposedly raises the octane by 7 numbers (so 100 if you run 93 from the pump). Does that require a new map from the Cobb AP? Also, there's some rumors on the internet about racing gas sitting in your fuel tank (when your car is not in use for a while) causing damage to parts of your fuel line and system - is that just for the pure race gas 102 stuff or does it include octane-boosted gas as well?

I think it will take you from 93 to 93.7.

Seriously.

Use something toxic but effective like toluene.

Old 05-09-2020, 06:11 PM
  #358  
Robdokwon
Rennlist Member
 
Robdokwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 72
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thesaintusa
I think it will take you from 93 to 93.7.

Seriously.

Use something toxic but effective like toluene.
Not sure you are correct - Octanium is good for 70 points or about 7 octane numbers up. According to Cobb's own website which I just read for the past 20 minutes, they claim it's fine to use higher octane than the map level you have, but not the other way around. Also, Cobb notes to use race gas octane of about 2 gallons at track events to help with the added heat. From what I've read across the web lately, higher race level octane is generally better all-around, but, then again some experienced track guys said they remove the gas from their tank after the track event. Looking for intelligent data and perspective on this rather than "hey dude skip the octane stuff man" replies.
Old 05-09-2020, 06:41 PM
  #359  
B Russ
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
B Russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 91North/75South
Posts: 2,517
Received 857 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Hopefully a chemical engineer specializing in petroleum refining is watching to answer you, beyond that its pure speculation.
Old 05-09-2020, 07:44 PM
  #360  
Robdokwon
Rennlist Member
 
Robdokwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 72
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

B Russ...thanks.


Quick Reply: 991.2 Cobb Accessport, post your results



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:17 AM.