Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GT3 Dealer Allocation Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2017, 12:07 PM
  #946  
herenow
Intermediate
 
herenow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Has anyone, not in the 918 VIP program, dealing with a South Florida dealer, gotten their allocation confirmed yet?
Old 04-03-2017, 12:22 PM
  #947  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,872 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
unsolicited offers from

lithia monterey porsche 15000 non refundable deposit and mkt price st time of delivery


bakersfield porsche 40000 over. i was about to show them
my family jewels as answer
Mooty, you should have reminded Lithia that non-refundable deposits are not legal in California...
Old 04-03-2017, 12:24 PM
  #948  
Nick
Race Car
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 3,779
Received 197 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Mooty, you should have reminded Lithia that non-refundable deposits are not legal in California...
That's not entirely correct. Very limited model deposits need not be returned if the buyer backs out.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:25 PM
  #949  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,872 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
All you guys getting calls from dealers that are offering you an allocation over MSRP, please provide the name/s of the dealers so everyone here knows who to avoid and not call them.
I'm guessing it'll be easier to just make a list of those selling at MSRP. Methinks it'll be a shorter list.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:31 PM
  #950  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,872 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick
That's not entirely correct. Very limited model deposits need not be returned if the buyer backs out.
I'd like to see the law on that, as dealers and a lawyer told me there are per se unenforceable in new vehicle contracts in CA. Even if there wasn't a strict limitation, and I've been told there is, the maximum amount they could retain would be their liquidated damages and they'd have to prove there were some. That would be pretty hard to prove on a car in high demand selling at huge premiums. A dealer cannot unjustly enrich themselves at your expense, which is what would occur if they held the deposit.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:37 PM
  #951  
Nick
Race Car
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 3,779
Received 197 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Most deposit are refundable. However, if the car is unique and limited the CA Court of Appeals has held that the dealer can confiscate the deposit. BTW, the car involved was a Ferrari F40. The decision was decided I believe in the early nineties.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:48 PM
  #952  
chaosoul
Pro
 
chaosoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Driver seat
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
Just want to clarify that courtesy delivery requires approval by the receiving dealer, so they can refuse and quite a few do. In my case I couldn't get courtesy delivery in Portland or Seattle. So it's nice, but not so simple.


Yea they do need just the ok from wherever you want the courtesy deliver gets done. Sorry to hear you had problems, I haven't heard anyone having problems with it on my end. Usually dealers gladly take it because they receive extra funds for PDI, and a chance for future services (for whatever reasons the people choose to do courtesy delivery for, like different residents in different states). Also leaves the customer in a bad taste with a refusal, so if I was a VIP customer, I wouldn't recommend the dealer or buy regular cars from them for future references.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:51 PM
  #953  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaosoul
Honestly, it is in the dealer's best interest to sell to the 918 VIP customers at MSRP for a few reasons. Firstly, as Whoopsy has mentioned, you can't just change host dealers anytime you want easily for convenience, but however it is possible if you are very dissatisfied with the dealer or you have a permanent resident location change, etc.


The 918 VIP allocations for cars (such as 911R, RS, GT3, etc) are not part of dealer's allocation pool. These extra cars are technically "extra money" dealer is making. Dealer's will still make around 25-30k per 911R and RS including holdbacks for selling at MSRP. Even if selling over MSRP to 918 customers is possible for the dealer, they would be essentially be risking the 918 customer to permanently move host dealer and lose out on free 25-30k profit on all future extra allocation for these customers (like GT2RS, Speedster, GT4RS, etc). I would just make the easy money without conflict since these allocations were extra anyways. I am sure another dealer would gladly take over another 918 customer as host dealer to transact their future allocations at MSRP to make free extra profit.


As mentioned, the 918 VIP program allocations are not the dealer's allocation, the allocation is paired to the customer name under PVMS. For example, if a dealer says "I will only sell your 911R to you at 100k over", the customer can refuse to buy it like any customer's right. However, the dealer cannot just sell it to another customer at 100k or 200k over. Now not only the dealer lose out on the easy 30k profit from the deal, they can not sell the car to another customer. PCNA is extremely strict about these appointed allocation's contract have to be sent back to PCNA with the new registered owner matching 918 customer's name (even if it is under a corporation). PCNA will decide what to do with the allocation, whether to move the allocation to a different dealer, or in the case where the 918 customer actually doesn't want to buy it anymore, PCNA will decide what name to change to allocation to (like race car drivers, celebrity, Porsche business partners, etc)


On a different side note, although 918 VIP customers cannot just choose which dealer they want the allocation to be sent to, their car can be delivered to any dealer in the US every time. They call it courtesy delivery, where the ordering and purchasing of the car is still done through the original host dealer, but the car is sent directly from port and vessel to a different delivery dealer, where they would PDI and wash the car for them to pick up.
Thanks for the info!
This brings up one more question:
If a VIP 918 allocation are separate from dealer allocations, why are so many dealers telling everyone THEIR allocations have all been taken up by 918 customers? Either the dealers are making stuff up (very possible), or the dealers are misunderstanding/misrepresenting their allocations.
Old 04-03-2017, 12:59 PM
  #954  
montoya
Rennlist Member
 
montoya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,555
Received 300 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Thanks for the info!
This brings up one more question:
If a VIP 918 allocation are separate from dealer allocations, why are so many dealers telling everyone THEIR allocations have all been taken up by 918 customers? Either the dealers are making stuff up (very possible), or the dealers are misunderstanding/misrepresenting their allocations.

I believe that once the VIP accepts the order the allocation is assigned to the dealer- so technically it's still an allocation with that dealer. In my case the dealer has two VIP's but only one allocation (it's a small dealership)- so I don't know what's up with that. I think the other VIP is probably waiting to see when the manuals are available and then place the order. So in fact, my dealer has yet to receive an open allocation- they are hoping for September. But when you check with Porsche Atlanta, it shows they have one allocation...
Old 04-03-2017, 01:04 PM
  #955  
Mr. Vanos
Instructor
 
Mr. Vanos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 183
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
Hey Simon, all the dealers I know that sell at MSRP have lists bigger than expected allocations. This may diminish as the time passes and people drop of from their multiple listings.
Yes I figured I may let the initial allocation go and expect some reality to settle in soon after. I'm sure they are calling everyone on the list now and I'm certain many will drop off at having to pay these absurd overages. If I hear one more "you gotta pay to play" quote

Originally Posted by porscheflat6
I am sorry to hear that. Unfortunate supply and demand issue in your market. Might touch base with dealers in central part of country they do business differently it seems.
I've done that and so far it's been a similar story. Have a few more to sort through. A few years back I was able to get a 997.1 GT3RS that way after countless phone calls and inquiries.


Originally Posted by usctrojanGT3
All you guys getting calls from dealers that are offering you an allocation over MSRP, please provide the name/s of the dealers so everyone here knows who to avoid and not call them.
I think you can pretty much assume ANY dealer in Cali is going to be the same. My 2 were Beverly Hills and Downtown LA. The latter actually surprised me as they don't typically sell over MSRP. I guess they figured there's more $$ to be had. Interesting enough, I know certain auto groups (since many of these dealers are now owned by larger corporations, ie Penske's, Autonations, etc.) have a policy of not selling over MSRP.
Old 04-03-2017, 01:10 PM
  #956  
chaosoul
Pro
 
chaosoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Driver seat
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
I'd like to see the law on that, as dealers and a lawyer told me there are per se unenforceable in new vehicle contracts in CA. Even if there wasn't a strict limitation, and I've been told there is, the maximum amount they could retain would be their liquidated damages and they'd have to prove there were some. That would be pretty hard to prove on a car in high demand selling at huge premiums. A dealer cannot unjustly enrich themselves at your expense, which is what would occur if they held the deposit.
Originally Posted by Nick
Most deposit are refundable. However, if the car is unique and limited the CA Court of Appeals has held that the dealer can confiscate the deposit. BTW, the car involved was a Ferrari F40. The decision was decided I believe in the early nineties.


Consumer rights in CA have changed quite a bit in CA since the 90s. Most of the time, yes you'll be able to get your deposit back eventually, but if the dealer want to play hard ball you'll have to take them to court, which I'm guessing most of you on here would gladly do if its against a dealer haha. If brought to court, the dealer would have to provide evidence to back up their losses for this particular vehicle, and it would have to be compelling as the judge will likely side with the consumer (similar to a judge siding with a cop on a traffic ticket on a "he said she said" scenario without evidence).


For custom cars like when you buy a Rolls Royce Phantom Drophead with pink leather interior, your name stitches on more than 8 places throughout the car's leather, door sill guard in your name with family crest, the RR dealer will make you sign a simple agreement saying that because of the nature of these custom options, you acknowledge the dealer's potential loss if you didn't purchase the car, so the dealer is entitled to loss recuperation. In this case you can still take them to court and it still may not be enforceable but they are more likely to win than not.


For me, I see it being a 2 sided blade for California. It is good in some way but it is bad in some way. Too many consumers will be turned away by dealers because their order is "not popular". Like seen on Macan when owner's want Sapphire blue exterior on Garnet red interior, the superman combo, many dealer's will refuse to order the car for them because they say if you decide it looks bad in person when it comes, they have to refund your deposit and they'll be the one stuck with it. Also seen on cars like BMW M3, M2, M5 etc when customers want to order manual but the dealer would refuse because they claim the car is too hard to sell if you back out. It gets even harder when you want your name on door sillguards etc (although some dealers are ok with it because door sillguards are much easier to replace than say, your leather). For states in which a deposit is non-refundable, dealers will more likely to order the exact specs of your car even if it was less popular.
Old 04-03-2017, 01:23 PM
  #957  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaosoul
For states in which a deposit is non-refundable, dealers will more likely to order the exact specs of your car even if it was less popular.
Looks like state laws only complicate the matter. Better to leave grown-ups just sign whatever contract suits both sides best on a case by case basis.
Old 04-03-2017, 01:24 PM
  #958  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,280
Received 1,457 Likes on 760 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Thanks for the info!
This brings up one more question:
If a VIP 918 allocation are separate from dealer allocations, why are so many dealers telling everyone THEIR allocations have all been taken up by 918 customers? Either the dealers are making stuff up (very possible), or the dealers are misunderstanding/misrepresenting their allocations.
918 allocations do not count towards there normal allocations - they are in addition to. The Dealers are full of it
Old 04-03-2017, 01:28 PM
  #959  
chaosoul
Pro
 
chaosoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Driver seat
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Thanks for the info!
This brings up one more question:
If a VIP 918 allocation are separate from dealer allocations, why are so many dealers telling everyone THEIR allocations have all been taken up by 918 customers? Either the dealers are making stuff up (very possible), or the dealers are misunderstanding/misrepresenting their allocations.


The dealers are making stuff up to tell you why they can't get you a car.


Dealer's allocations are consist of 4 categories: Dealer's pool allocation, 918 VIP program allocation, VVIP allocations, and special allocations.


Prior to 2014, 99.5% of all allocations are just Dealer's pool allocation. When PCNA debuts the car, they first contact 918 VIP program customers and VVIP customers. They determine how many of them want the GT3, for example. PCNA tallies up exactly how many of them want the GT3 initially (lets say 150 918 VIP customers want it and 30 VVIP customers want it). Then they wait for PAG Germany to tell them exactly how many they will get from July production to December production. Lets just say a random number of 500. PCNA will first allocate the cars to the 918 VIP customers based on where their host dealer is, and allocate the VVIP customers to wherever they name they want (of course, all cars at PCNA's final discretion; if they still qualify etc). So we have 500 - 150 - 30 = 320 allocations (again, just random made up numbers). Then PCNA determines the dealer's pool allocation based on performance and sales. They tally up what each dealer's % of sales for a particular model in the nation. For example, if Rusnak Porsche sold 0.5% of all GT cars (or just 911) in the nation in previous 12 months, they will get approximately 0.5% of the 320 allocations left (after subtracting 918 VIP and VVIP). It is not exact as they will adjust it minutely (add or minus) based on other performances (like violations, other total sales, Premier dealer or not, etc).


Sometimes 918 customers would say "no they are not interested in the beginning" when they are determining allocations, but few weeks later decides that they do want it. PCNA would have to use their own discretion to see if they can squeeze them in, or wait till the next allocation cycle to come down from PAG Germany (for cars like GT3 which are less limited, for 911R it may not be possible if you refuse it in beginning).
Old 04-03-2017, 01:40 PM
  #960  
Nick
Race Car
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: La Jolla
Posts: 3,779
Received 197 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

How does Porsche define VVIP? Also, what triggers special allocations?


Quick Reply: GT3 Dealer Allocation Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:15 PM.