Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Orthojoe's track build journal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2015, 02:19 AM
  #1381  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Great update Joe. Just for sake of clarity given the length of the thread could you re iterate your current geo settings you are happy with?
No prob!

Front:
-2.7 camber (maxed out, not enough threads to add anymore shims)
9.5 degrees caster
3mm total toe out front (1.5mm each side)
Sway bar full stiff

Rear:
-2.4 camber
6mm total toe in (3mm each side)
Sway bar full soft
Old 10-13-2015, 04:09 AM
  #1382  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Thanks mate. Good to have the data point right there...
Old 10-13-2015, 04:28 AM
  #1383  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,424
Received 1,675 Likes on 777 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
No prob!

Front:
-2.7 camber (maxed out, not enough threads to add anymore shims)
9.5 degrees caster
3mm total toe out front (1.5mm each side)
Sway bar full stiff

Rear:
-2.4 camber
6mm total toe in (3mm each side)
Sway bar full soft
Joe, I'm going to a German dealer next week to ask about stock alignment was for RS and what they are doing for the guys that track and race them. Peterfirst is also contacting a few RS owners who are tracking them.

Your numbers seem opposite of where it seems the RS wants to go.
Now my car understeers and outside tires wear.

F
Zero toe
-3 camber
Caster unknown

R
2mm in each side
-2.5 camber

Bars both middle I'd say if I change I go stuffer in the rear...

Stay tuned thanks for all the sharing.
Old 10-13-2015, 06:07 AM
  #1384  
denis59
Intermediate
 
denis59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hello,
tracked my Rs this week-end.
2.85 front and 2.15 rear camber, castor 9.5
temperature of the tires were perfect front and rear
i found that 29 and 31 were correct pressures
no rubbing into the fenders
adjust front sway to full soft and rear to full stiff.i have understeer with original settings
it was cold... first session 1c last session 14c
denis
Old 10-13-2015, 06:12 AM
  #1385  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,424
Received 1,675 Likes on 777 Posts
Default

Thank you Denis!

I have no more rubbing after raising the complete car one turn per shock +1.5mm?
Also because I'm not driving on the Ring / big compression.

I also angled the rear wing a bit, lowering the front of the wing.
I think I am OK with what I have but will reconfirm on the 22nd after going to the Porsche dealer then in the 23rd I may ask them at Hickenheim to stiffen the rear bar, followed by softening the front bar.

What track did you drive?
Old 10-13-2015, 11:12 AM
  #1386  
denis59
Intermediate
 
denis59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hi peter,
drove at circuit mont tremblant.
i also angled the wing,probably the reason of understeer in fast bends before adjusting the sways
denis
Old 10-13-2015, 11:22 AM
  #1387  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Joe, I'm going to a German dealer next week to ask about stock alignment was for RS and what they are doing for the guys that track and race them. Peterfirst is also contacting a few RS owners who are tracking them.

Your numbers seem opposite of where it seems the RS wants to go.
Now my car understeers and outside tires wear.

F
Zero toe
-3 camber
Caster unknown

R
2mm in each side
-2.5 camber

Bars both middle I'd say if I change I go stuffer in the rear...

Stay tuned thanks for all the sharing.
Fwiw, I'm discovering that tire wear and edge wear is track dependent. Thill wear rate and edge wear is more than at Sonoma or Laguna.

It could be that I'm slower at Laguna and Sonoma, but I think it is the many high speed turns and sweepers at thill that kill the tires.

If it wasn't for needing to replace my front set of tires due to the rupture, I'm guessing the front and rear would have worn evenly this time around too....
Old 10-13-2015, 11:45 AM
  #1388  
Ducati1199
Burning Brakes
 
Ducati1199's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Danville, Ca
Posts: 939
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

So when ur at LS Joe are you lifting thru the sound check turns &/or short shifting or is the GPS activated exhaust valves plus the turnaway pipes doing enough to keep you within sound limits??
Old 10-13-2015, 12:04 PM
  #1389  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,324
Received 4,505 Likes on 2,563 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Fwiw, I'm discovering that tire wear and edge wear is track dependent. Thill wear rate and edge wear is more than at Sonoma or Laguna.
No doubt about that. Pavement surface grip, camber, etc., and how they affect balance of the car make a big difference, in my experience. To some extent, we can change our inputs to adapt to tracks/turns to extract grip and performance from the car without prematurely killing tires. Lately, I'm also leaning towards initially running a bit higher pressure to avoid prematurely killing the edges of the tires, then gradually backing down the hot pressure based on the tire wear. But in general, I think we can expect that the tires won't last too long if we intend to drive the car hard.
Old 10-13-2015, 12:26 PM
  #1390  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,394
Received 634 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
No prob!

Front:
-2.7 camber (maxed out, not enough threads to add anymore shims)
9.5 degrees caster
3mm total toe out front (1.5mm each side)
Sway bar full stiff

Rear:
-2.4 camber
6mm total toe in (3mm each side)
Sway bar full soft
I didn't realize you changed the rear bar setting too... I have same setup but front at stiff and rear at middle, and I still feel a bit of under steer in general.
Old 10-13-2015, 12:32 PM
  #1391  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ducati1199
So when ur at LS Joe are you lifting thru the sound check turns &/or short shifting or is the GPS activated exhaust valves plus the turnaway pipes doing enough to keep you within sound limits??
Watch the video. No lift, no short shift at the sound station between T5 and T6. GPS switch and turnaway is good for 90dB

Originally Posted by Mech33
I didn't realize you changed the rear bar setting too... I have same setup but front at stiff and rear at middle, and I still feel a bit of under steer in general.
I follow Randy Pobst's preference for slight understeer as the faster setup for me. If that is what you prefer as well, then leave it be. Softening the rear bar more will only add more understeer.
Old 10-14-2015, 12:07 AM
  #1392  
vantage
Three Wheelin'
 
vantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,903
Received 224 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Joe, so the Dunlops require 2-3psi more air in your experience? Where does that put you, around 35psi?
Old 10-14-2015, 12:30 AM
  #1393  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vantage
Joe, so the Dunlops require 2-3psi more air in your experience? Where does that put you, around 35psi?
It is my understanding that the dunlops want 2-3psi more than the MPSC2. It makes sense to me given how the outer tread block on the dunlops are not as big and bulky as the MPSC2. I haven't run the dunlops yet myself, though. I plan to run my dunlops next month.

On MPSC2, I shoot for 32F/33-34R. I'll try out 35F/36R with the dunlops and report back next month.
Old 10-14-2015, 01:08 AM
  #1394  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,394
Received 634 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
It is my understanding that the dunlops want 2-3psi more than the MPSC2. It makes sense to me given how the outer tread block on the dunlops are not as big and bulky as the MPSC2. I haven't run the dunlops yet myself, though. I plan to run my dunlops next month.

On MPSC2, I shoot for 32F/33-34R. I'll try out 35F/36R with the dunlops and report back next month.
Why are you running Dunlops?? I just ordered from MPSC2 off of tire rack and they shipped a week later.
Old 10-14-2015, 01:10 AM
  #1395  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,511
Received 5,800 Likes on 2,376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
I didn't realize you changed the rear bar setting too... I have same setup but front at stiff and rear at middle, and I still feel a bit of under steer in general.
if you are full stiff front bar, no matter what else you do, your car will push.


Quick Reply: Orthojoe's track build journal



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:43 PM.