GT4 RS Driving Impressions
#721
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have to agree with you to a certain extent. The 992GT3 Touring ideally should have had softer springs compared to the winged car for touring. I spoke at length with Pete at Centre Gravity and he said that the awful tramlining on the 992GT3 on rougher roads was a direct result of the double wishbones. Apparately Porsche got it wrong as a first attempt and needs to have both the toe and front camber eased off to compensate for the hyper steering and DWs.
#722
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sure, but cars like 4RS, 992 GT3, 991.2 3RS, and 992 Turbo S are different enough in personality, strengths and weaknesses, that I think they shouldn't really be compared. Interestingly, they all sit in a similar price range (at currently market price), and they all have a similar lap time on track (with equal tires and setup). So the choice between them isn't really about objective performance.
#723
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
for what reason ?, it's not like it's a great road car ! the Touring, it's still bouncy, hard as nails and you have to swap it out on road tyres but it will still tram line and make tons of tyre noise ! , then whats the point any way. not sure why people want to own more than one GT car. I would under stand if you said 992 Turbo S and a 4RS or a GTS etc. But owning a touring and a 4RS no thanks.
I have 4 atm but all different. I daily a GTS, I have a 997 for slower fun and it's just cool, I have my Spyder for sunny days(so it never gets used) and the 4RS for track and blats. A touring don't fit anywhere, it's also **** at touring , I would take my GTS ! very over rated cars esp as you pay more than a GT3 for one ! imho.
I have 4 atm but all different. I daily a GTS, I have a 997 for slower fun and it's just cool, I have my Spyder for sunny days(so it never gets used) and the 4RS for track and blats. A touring don't fit anywhere, it's also **** at touring , I would take my GTS ! very over rated cars esp as you pay more than a GT3 for one ! imho.
I have to agree with you to a certain extent. The 992GT3 Touring ideally should have had softer springs compared to the winged car for touring. I spoke at length with Pete at Centre Gravity and he said that the awful tramlining on the 992GT3 on rougher roads was a direct result of the double wishbones. Apparately Porsche got it wrong as a first attempt and needs to have both the toe and front camber eased off to compensate for the hyper steering and DWs.
#724
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Drove my GT4RS 10 min through local roads to the PPF shop, never went higher than maybe 3-4k. The induction noise is not done any justice on youtube videos, and i maybe gently squeezed the throttle. Very excited for the post break in period. End of my 1.1 mile driving impression.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The following 7 users liked this post by Dizzy1127:
David Diulus (04-28-2024),
jabwind51 (04-28-2024),
Manifold (04-26-2024),
Mike981S (06-03-2024),
Mr. Adair (04-27-2024),
and 2 others liked this post.
#725
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've done a lot of car comparisons. That can be useful to understand the differences and similarities of cars. But ultimately, I've moved towards the view that car comparison can be counterproductive, because it can make one approach a car very analytically and reductionistically. Instead, I find it better to just drive and experience a car in the moment, trying to holistically appreciate the unique recipe which makes the car what it is. If I'm eating steak in a restaurant, I savor and enjoy the steak as I'm eating it, and don't find myself comparing it to lobster or salmon.
Imo unreflective hedonism and obsessive analysis are both detrimental to the experience. But then, suspect we are each born leaning one way or the other.
#726
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
LOL. That's the difference between a hedonist and a connoisseur. The former indulges in the pleasure, and that is enough, whereas the latter needs to understand the constituents of that pleasure. To some, the attendant comparisons and critical analysis reduce and interfere with the pleasure. To others, they enhance the pleasure. Hence there's literature and comparative literature.
Imo unreflective hedonism and obsessive analysis are both detrimental to the experience. But then, suspect we are each born leaning one way or the other.
Imo unreflective hedonism and obsessive analysis are both detrimental to the experience. But then, suspect we are each born leaning one way or the other.
#727
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sure, but cars like 4RS, 992 GT3, 991.2 3RS, and 992 Turbo S are different enough in personality, strengths and weaknesses, that I think they shouldn't really be compared. Interestingly, they all sit in a similar price range (at currently market price), and they all have a similar lap time on track (with equal tires and setup). So the choice between them isn't really about objective performance.
I take route 1, doesn't automatically means route 2 and 3 and 4 are bad. Some people just need to be less sensitive to non-positive comments that's also non-negative to their preference.
#728
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think GT3 is fat, big, unwieldy to drive. There, that's bad mouthing as a comparison.
I had a 992 GT3, one of the early ones even. That's my very first impression driving it out of the delivery bay, actually in alcc's home dealership. It doesn't drive bad, in fact it drives very nice. The engine note is mega and the new 992 interior is lovely. All the adjectives I used aren't mutually exclusive and the car has all of those.
#729
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Basically going from A to B, but taking different routes depending on one's preference. There isn't a bad route.
I take route 1, doesn't automatically means route 2 and 3 and 4 are bad. Some people just need to be less sensitive to non-positive comments that's also non-negative to their preference.
I take route 1, doesn't automatically means route 2 and 3 and 4 are bad. Some people just need to be less sensitive to non-positive comments that's also non-negative to their preference.
#730
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Audiophiles obsess over "air", "bloom", macro v. microdynamics (torque curve?), tube v. solid state (air v. water?), vinyl v. digital (NA v. turbo?)...
Too bad there are no equals to the "golden ears" and prose of Harry Pearson among the crude car "reviewers." Otoh, thank god there are also no equivalents to snake oil stuff like $30,000 cables.
Guess car nerd are more rational than audio nerds.
The following users liked this post:
UncleDude (04-26-2024)
#731
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don't know if you have other "enthusiasms." Consider audiophiles (mea culpa) or oenophiles.
Audiophiles obsess over "air", "bloom", macro v. microdynamics (torque curve?), tube v. solid state (air v. water?), vinyl v. digital (NA v. turbo?)...
Too bad there are no equals to the "golden ears" and prose of Harry Pearson among the crude car "reviewers." Otoh, thank god there are also no equivalents to snake oil stuff like $30,000 cables.
Guess car nerd are more rational than audio nerds.
Audiophiles obsess over "air", "bloom", macro v. microdynamics (torque curve?), tube v. solid state (air v. water?), vinyl v. digital (NA v. turbo?)...
Too bad there are no equals to the "golden ears" and prose of Harry Pearson among the crude car "reviewers." Otoh, thank god there are also no equivalents to snake oil stuff like $30,000 cables.
Guess car nerd are more rational than audio nerds.
I've sort of done the audiophile thing for about 45 years. After trying a lot of gear and doing some blind testing, I concluded that a lot of things which appear to matter don't actually matter, but there's definitely better and worse sound quality and fidelity (mostly related to speakers and acoustics, less so for amps, DACs, cables, etc.).
I used to like wine, but have developed a sensitive tummy, so no more alcohol for me. I'm sure you've read about wine blind testing? The exact same wine tends to be perceived to taste better if it has a higher price tag or a more appealing color. Maybe a 4RS in a vomit color would be perceived to sound worse or be slower?
The relevance of all this for cars is that our perceptions don't always match reality (can result in perceiving things that aren't there, and not perceiving things that are there), and the things we say to each other here on RL can influence our perceptions. That's why people don't want to hear (the claim) that the 4RS lacks mid-range punch.
#732
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Good discussion.
I've sort of done the audiophile thing for about 45 years. After trying a lot of gear and doing some blind testing, I concluded that a lot of things which appear to matter don't actually matter, but there's definitely better and worse sound quality and fidelity (mostly related to speakers and acoustics, less so for amps, DACs, cables, etc.).
I used to like wine, but have developed a sensitive tummy, so no more alcohol for me. I'm sure you've read about wine blind testing? The exact same wine tends to be perceived to taste better if it has a higher price tag or a more appealing color. Maybe a 4RS in a vomit color would be perceived to sound worse or be slower?
The relevance of all this for cars is that our perceptions don't always match reality (can result in perceiving things that aren't there, and not perceiving things that are there), and the things we say to each other here on RL can influence our perceptions. That's why people don't want to hear (the claim) that the 4RS lacks mid-range punch.
I've sort of done the audiophile thing for about 45 years. After trying a lot of gear and doing some blind testing, I concluded that a lot of things which appear to matter don't actually matter, but there's definitely better and worse sound quality and fidelity (mostly related to speakers and acoustics, less so for amps, DACs, cables, etc.).
I used to like wine, but have developed a sensitive tummy, so no more alcohol for me. I'm sure you've read about wine blind testing? The exact same wine tends to be perceived to taste better if it has a higher price tag or a more appealing color. Maybe a 4RS in a vomit color would be perceived to sound worse or be slower?
The relevance of all this for cars is that our perceptions don't always match reality (can result in perceiving things that aren't there, and not perceiving things that are there), and the things we say to each other here on RL can influence our perceptions. That's why people don't want to hear (the claim) that the 4RS lacks mid-range punch.
The more we expect from the gear, the less we enjoy the experience. A tough thing to overcome.
#733
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,931
Received 4,263 Likes
on
2,434 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Funny: I enjoy music a lot more on my modest family room system than on the high-end system in my dedicated listening room -- because I listen to the music instead of to the (imperfections) in the gear. Ditto, I enjoy driving a scenic back road in my 25 yo. E36 M3 more than in my F-cars or 4RS -- because I enjoy the road and the scenery instead of fussing over the (imperfect) damping, the understeer...
The more we expect from the gear, the less we enjoy the experience. A tough thing to overcome.
The more we expect from the gear, the less we enjoy the experience. A tough thing to overcome.
I was thinking about selling my manual 997 to make space in the garage, but your comment about your E36 has me reconsidering. TBH, if I wasn't doing the track thing, I'm not sure that I'd own any Porsche GT cars; they can be enjoyed on the road, but I feel like their true home is the track.
#734
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Funny: I enjoy music a lot more on my modest family room system than on the high-end system in my dedicated listening room -- because I listen to the music instead of to the (imperfections) in the gear. Ditto, I enjoy driving a scenic back road in my 25 yo. E36 M3 more than in my F-cars or 4RS -- because I enjoy the road and the scenery instead of fussing over the (imperfect) damping, the understeer...
The more we expect from the gear, the less we enjoy the experience. A tough thing to overcome.
The more we expect from the gear, the less we enjoy the experience. A tough thing to overcome.
That's just about sums it up perfectly. Enjoy the car, enjoy the roads being driven on.
The following users liked this post:
Knutsm01 (04-26-2024)
#735
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
His opinion is the 4RS is more fun to drive, deal with it :-), he is not bad mouthing anything just voicing an opinion. People do get touchy.
Same reason I own one and I have 4 Porkers but I don't want a 992 GT3, that does not make it a bad car, I just don't want one either, the thread is called driving impressions of the 4RS, so the best car to compare it with is a 992 GT3 or the 991.2 RS as they are all about the same money atm.
Same reason I own one and I have 4 Porkers but I don't want a 992 GT3, that does not make it a bad car, I just don't want one either, the thread is called driving impressions of the 4RS, so the best car to compare it with is a 992 GT3 or the 991.2 RS as they are all about the same money atm.