I am sad to say.......
#121
Drifting
#124
Rennlist Member
I was at Sebring and having watched Fred C, Mark Hupfer, Doug Crossman, and Doug Roach duke it out was great! These guys are all great drivers. Watch the videos they post. I'll be watching Fred's video from NJMP over and over again before the race this year.
The big difference I could see between all of the above and most of the rest of the cars in their classes is where these guys would brake for turn 17 at Sebring. They were all going in way deeper than the other cars in their classes. To me that is driver skill and the size of their you know whats, along with perfectly set up cars.
The big difference I could see between all of the above and most of the rest of the cars in their classes is where these guys would brake for turn 17 at Sebring. They were all going in way deeper than the other cars in their classes. To me that is driver skill and the size of their you know whats, along with perfectly set up cars.
#125
Rennlist Member
I raced with a guy last year that ran an older 911 in both PCA and NASA. He was 2 seconds a lap faster when he drove PCA. Just sayin...
( it wasn't Streak he's always slow )
( it wasn't Streak he's always slow )
#126
You are not alone in your thoughts my friend. Unfortunately, no one has the ***** to lodge a formal protest and rid the ship of the cheaters.
I can fully understand Pat Long or Leh Keen tearing up any track in "D" class for example. But a "good" amateur racer setting lap records and being considerably faster than "good" amateurs in classes 2 or 3 above his car? I don't buy it. There is a reason that pca has specific formulas for its various classes. The "D" car should not be faster than the "E", "F", or "G" car given the same driver, but it is happening more and more.
PCA needs to put an end to the debauchery amongst its ranks. Two of my friends are leaving PCA after the shenanigans at Sebring.
I can fully understand Pat Long or Leh Keen tearing up any track in "D" class for example. But a "good" amateur racer setting lap records and being considerably faster than "good" amateurs in classes 2 or 3 above his car? I don't buy it. There is a reason that pca has specific formulas for its various classes. The "D" car should not be faster than the "E", "F", or "G" car given the same driver, but it is happening more and more.
PCA needs to put an end to the debauchery amongst its ranks. Two of my friends are leaving PCA after the shenanigans at Sebring.
As someone else posted, you are completely discounting the huge disparity in driver skill among the racers. Basically, within each class there are a handful of drivers who are amazing and can drive faster than most of the other drivers who are a class ahead of them. Fred is one of those drivers. The reason he was faster than all E class drivers is that the good E class drivers (Hupfer and Crossman) moved up to F.
#127
I feel like I'm missing something because that doesn't make sense at all. NASA basically has no rules other than the power-to-weight ratio classification. Are you saying that this guy put on some mod to cheat within PCA, and then took off the mod for NASA even though that mod would be completely legal in NASA?
#128
Rennlist Member
I feel like I'm missing something because that doesn't make sense at all. NASA basically has no rules other than the power-to-weight ratio classification. Are you saying that this guy put on some mod to cheat within PCA, and then took off the mod for NASA even though that mod would be completely legal in NASA?
#129
Rennlist Member
I feel like I'm missing something because that doesn't make sense at all. NASA basically has no rules other than the power-to-weight ratio classification. Are you saying that this guy put on some mod to cheat within PCA, and then took off the mod for NASA even though that mod would be completely legal in NASA?
For instance, if I am running up against a guy with 210 at the wheels and I have 190. He has to add weight at NASA which evens things out considerably. With PCA we are running the same weight in the same class.
#130
Rennlist Member
#131
NASA Racer
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
As someone else posted, you are completely discounting the huge disparity in driver skill among the racers. Basically, within each class there are a handful of drivers who are amazing and can drive faster than most of the other drivers who are a class ahead of them. Fred is one of those drivers. The reason he was faster than all E class drivers is that the good E class drivers (Hupfer and Crossman) moved up to F.
#132
Ok, call me naive, but I just don't think there is much cheating going on in PCA. When I'm getting beaten in races, I can clearly see from the cornering speeds involved that I'm being beaten by a better driver.
Maybe it's time that Paolo starts a thread just on PCA cheating.
Maybe it's time that Paolo starts a thread just on PCA cheating.
#133
Rennlist Member
As I said, I think this is really hard for someone on the sidelines to understand. You look at the results and think WTF? Unless you race with these guys it's hard to understand just how good they are and in almost every case how much closer to the edge they are than everybody else. Fred, Gary and I have identically set up cars - same specs on engine rebuild, same suspension, etc. Go back and look at Fred's times in races this past year versus mine and Gary's. That's how much better a driver he is - seconds, not tenths. To the non-believers, put him in your car and he'll best your time on any track by many seconds and you'll get some great data to boot.
#134
Rennlist Member
Ok, call me naive, but I just don't think there is much cheating going on in PCA. When I'm getting beaten in races, I can clearly see from the cornering speeds involved that I'm being beaten by a better driver.
Maybe it's time that Paolo starts a thread just on PCA cheating.
Maybe it's time that Paolo starts a thread just on PCA cheating.