Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which passing rules are better?
Current
59
85.51%
Proposed
10
14.49%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

PCA passing rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2018, 05:11 PM
  #226  
certz
Three Wheelin'
 
certz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,389
Received 67 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
There is also NO racing without overtaking, or without getting out of bed that morning.





So we all seem to prefer (and hope for) the "gentlemanly" Scenario b in which a door is not slammed (and room is given), yet we understand that the rules are enforcing Scenario a in which a door could be "legally" slammed with no penalty for the "slammer" if contact is initiated. Assuming that we also agree that the rules should be consistent and non-contradicting, which one of these two sets of consistent rules would you prefer to race under?

(Scenario a):
1. The passing car has the responsibility to make a clean pass.
2. The car ahead at turn in has the corner.

OR

(Scenario b):
1. The car ahead at turn in does not own the corner.
2. Everyone must leave racing room.

Thx.
You seem to want Scenario b because it allows for a dive bomb to be acceptable - as long as the bomber leaves room then he is okay, does not seem to matter how late to the party he is. Which also means the car being passed has to always assume he cannot apex a corner if there is a car coming up from behind because if he does there is the chance he gets dived bombed and accused of not leaving room. It comes back to the responsibility of the pass is left to the passing car and if that car thinks a dive bomb is okay, they are wrong. They are wrong in PCA, in SCCA and in professional racing, period.

Now, does it happen, yes it does. I avoided dive bombing cup cars and GTB1 cars last weekend at Road Atlanta, because, like Gary said, I would rather finish than deal with an incident. In every instance I could have taken my normal line and the possibility of contact would have gone up dramatically. And afterwards said see here Scenario a protects me. But that is not the way I race nor want others to race me. There is a fine line between aggressive clean racing and just aggressive racing. Maybe I am reading your responses wrong, but many of them seem to state that you think that if you are even as little as a tenth faster than the car in front of you, they should get out your way. That is not racing. I have seen some very exciting races where a slightly slower car is able to keep a slightly faster car behind them while both cars raced cleanly and "respectfully" - which is the key IMO.
Old 04-16-2018, 05:38 PM
  #227  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by certz
You seem to want Scenario b because it allows for a dive bomb to be acceptable - as long as the bomber leaves room then he is okay, does not seem to matter how late to the party he is.
That’s not what the question presented. It assumes 3/4 car-length overlap between the two cars at turn-in.

Which also means the car being passed has to always assume he cannot apex a corner if there is a car coming up from behind because if he does there is the chance he gets dived bombed and accused of not leaving room. It comes back to the responsibility of the pass is left to the passing car and if that car thinks a dive bomb is okay, they are wrong. They are wrong in PCA, in SCCA and in professional racing, period.
I agree. Divebomb means no overlap at turn in, hence should be penalized if it causes contact.

Now, does it happen, yes it does. I avoided dive bombing cup cars and GTB1 cars last weekend at Road Atlanta, because, like Gary said, I would rather finish than deal with an incident. In every instance I could have taken my normal line and the possibility of contact would have gone up dramatically. And afterwards said see here Scenario a protects me. But that is not the way I race nor want others to race me. There is a fine line between aggressive clean racing and just aggressive racing. Maybe I am reading your responses wrong, but many of them seem to state that you think that if you are even as little as a tenth faster than the car in front of you, they should get out your way. That is not racing. I have seen some very exciting races where a slightly slower car is able to keep a slightly faster car behind them while both cars raced cleanly and "respectfully" - which is the key IMO.
A divebomb is easily prevented by taking a defensive line or an earlier turn-in. By positioning itself strategically while still following the blocking rules, the lead car can direct the car behind where it would allow room for a pass if overlap is established. If the car behind is gaining on you, and you don’t want them to establish overlap on the inside, then take the inside line in time and give them room on the outside. But once it establishes overlap it’s proper and gentlemanly to leave him room and not push him off the track regardless who’s ahead at turn-in, IMO, of course. This gamesmanship and positioning interplay, to me, is the most fun part of racing. Racing is not merely “DE without pointbys” where everyone gets to drive the line and use the whole track as if there’s no one else around.

So, I gather that you prefer the Scenario a) set of rules above (“The car ahead at turn-in has the corner...”)? I have no problem sticking with those if everyone prefers them to the Scenario b) set. That’s what we’re trying to find out.

I appreciate your reasoned input.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:00 PM
  #228  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,991
Received 3,101 Likes on 1,810 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1

That’s not what the question presented. It assumes 3/4 car-length overlap between the two cars at turn-in.

I agree. Divebomb means no overlap at turn in, hence should be penalized if it causes contact.

THIS is the problem.

The overlap is NOT a STATIC condition. The position of the cars, relative to each other, is not fixed. If it was, it would be a snap to adjudicate this.

But, because the overtaking car is the ONLY car that has a clear view of the both cars relative position, closing speed and judging the intersection of each, it's the OVERTAKING car's responsibility.

The most successful passing opportunity begins at the exit of the previous corner.

If I can't draw alongside, place my car in their sight line BEFORE they can screw me by saying "they couldn't see me," or take away their ability to turn in ON me by placing my car slightly ahead, then I can't pass safely.

Seems simple to me.

Judging an overtaken driver's defensive move or, heaven forbid, trying to "draw a charge" in this situation, is sort of like the judge's description of pornography. "I know it when I see it..."
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway






















Old 04-16-2018, 06:00 PM
  #229  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,583
Received 271 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Gary, do you think that the enforcement of Scenario b ("...does not own the corner. Everyone must leave racing room.") by punishing the outside passed ("chopper") car with a 13 for the contact would encourage awareness and lower the frequency of this chop happening? Do you think that the enforcement of Scenario a ("The car ahead at turn in has the corner...") by punishing the inside passing car with a 13 for the contact discourages awareness on the part of the outside passed car and increases the frequency of this chop happening?
I believe:
NO one owns the corner.
If you can't get your car fully alongside the car being passed going into the corner back out and try again.
Rules will not make someone more aware, if you happen to be in his blind spot and you hope for the best... good luck
As I stated earlier, this is supposed to be fun and an accident, regardless of who is at fault, does not fit that description
All this discussion is great, but my thought is all it does is better define fault AFTER an accident. I'd rather avoid winning or losing in that situation.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:16 PM
  #230  
jdistefa
Rennlist Member
 
jdistefa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Onterrible
Posts: 7,920
Received 483 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

OMG this thread won't die.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:29 PM
  #231  
MSR Racer
Rennlist Member
 
MSR Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mid-South
Posts: 1,199
Received 184 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

This kind of over-analyzing scares me! 😳

Rules aside, you learn to race better with experience. It is good to be a safe driver at the begining even if it means being less “ racy”
Old 04-16-2018, 06:34 PM
  #232  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
As I stated earlier, this is supposed to be fun and an accident, regardless of who is at fault, does not fit that description
All this discussion is great, but my thought is all it does is better define fault AFTER an accident. I'd rather avoid winning or losing in that situation.
I agree, but defining fault AFTER determines which behavior is encouraged and which is discouraged by the rules. Theft laws/rules only define fault AFTER the theft, too. This doesn't make these laws useless. On the contrary, it's how they discourage something undesirable (theft) from happening. The reason there are rules in the first place is to reflect the expectations for desirable behavior and to discourage undesirable behavior.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:41 PM
  #233  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MSR Racer
This kind of over-analyzing scares me! 😳
Rules aside, you learn to race better with experience. It is good to be a safe driver at the begining even if it means being less “ racy”
Don't be scared. I've been racing for ten years. It's scarier to race under rules which allow for two conflicting scenarios to develop.
Old 04-16-2018, 06:48 PM
  #234  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
If I can't draw alongside, place my car in their sight line BEFORE they can screw me by saying "they couldn't see me," or take away their ability to turn in ON me by placing my car slightly ahead, then I can't pass safely.

Seems simple to me.
So now you seem to support Scenario a ("The car ahead at turn-in has the corner..."), whereas before you explained how it would be nice if everyone followed Scenario b ("...does not own the corner. Everyone must leave racing room."). Which is it -- as it's obvious that we can't have it both ways?

(Scenario a):
1. The passing car has the responsibility to make a clean pass.
2. The car ahead at turn in has the corner.

OR

(Scenario b):
1. The car ahead at turn in does not own the corner.
2. Everyone must leave racing room.

Btw, the current PCA rules include ALL of the above, as they are copied above almost verbatim.
Old 04-16-2018, 08:06 PM
  #235  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,991
Received 3,101 Likes on 1,810 Posts
Default

From an enforceable, rules based perspective, I support the clarity and accountability in a).

I described to you, which you quoted, the conditions I must fulfill to make the pass according to scenario a).

As I said before, my best friends and I look out for each other and undertake scenario b) all the time. One of the things that’s strengthened our friendship.

But it’s hard to assign responsibility for a contact incident when the wording of scenario b) exists to moderate the stark, clear scenario a).
Old 04-16-2018, 08:21 PM
  #236  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
From an enforceable, rules based perspective, I support the clarity and accountability in a).

I described to you, which you quoted, the conditions I must fulfill to make the pass according to scenario a).

As I said before, my best friends and I look out for each other and undertake scenario b) all the time. One of the things that’s strengthened our friendship.

But it’s hard to assign responsibility for a contact incident when the wording of scenario b) exists to moderate the stark, clear scenario a).
Thanks for clarifying. May I ask why you wouldn't support Scenario b from an enforceable, rules-based perspective? Why not support a rule set which enforces for everyone the behavior (scenario) that you enjoy sharing with your trusted friends? Btw, this Scenario b behavior is what I was talking about earlier in this thread when I wrote about "gentleman handshake" agreements that I've seen the fastest and most experienced racers employ when they race with each other. I actually took part in one before my rookie PCA race. Why not bring this obviously preferable and desirable behavior officially to the light of day and above the table for all racers to enjoy, and especially for rookie racer generations to practice and inherit? Honest question.
Old 04-16-2018, 08:45 PM
  #237  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,583
Received 271 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Trust is not earned with a handshake, as you quickly found out in your 1st PCA race. In racing we earn the trust of others as they earn ours, and the racing itself benefits. Hf1, you shook the wrong hand and didn't have the PCA racing experience to know it, and now you want the rules to either morph/change or the racers involved to meet your expectations of abiding by them. I guess I had the wrong mindset as I have always treated Club Racing as an experience shared among (some old, some new) friends.. Don't get me wrong, I want more clarity and less ambivalence in how they are written but listen to what I have heard SO many times at the racer's meeting before we all start.. (excuse my inaccuracy) .. "take care of each other out there, we are all friends".. and i'm done with this, thank you.
Old 04-16-2018, 09:34 PM
  #238  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,991
Received 3,101 Likes on 1,810 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
"take care of each other out there, we are all friends".. and i'm done with this, thank you.
Same here.
Old 04-16-2018, 09:42 PM
  #239  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,583
Received 271 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
Same here.
Cheers from Spain Peter, hope to see you at Limerock!

Last edited by Gary R.; 04-17-2018 at 07:42 AM.
Old 04-16-2018, 10:04 PM
  #240  
hf1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Trust is not earned with a handshake, as you quickly found out in your 1st PCA race. In racing we earn the trust of others as they earn ours, and the racing itself benefits. Hf1, you shook the wrong hand and didn't have the PCA racing experience to know it, and now you want the rules to either morph/change or the racers involved to meet your expectations of abiding by them. I guess I had the wrong mindset as I have always treated Club Racing as an experience shared among (some old, some new) friends.. Don't get me wrong, I want more clarity and less ambivalence in how they are written but listen to what I have heard SO many times at the racer's meeting before we all start.. (excuse my inaccuracy) .. "take care of each other out there, we are all friends".. and i'm done with this, thank you.
I agree 100% and I still think that there is zero downside and plenty of upside when the rules themselves reflect and enforce behaviors already widely practiced by racers who trust each other: Scenario b ("The car ahead at turn-in does not own the corner. Always leave racing room."). Appreciate your input, and sorry I won't see you at Limerock.


Quick Reply: PCA passing rules



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:22 AM.