View Poll Results: what do you think?
really clean, nice looking Vette....
174
31.46%
a very different Vette but we'll sure as hell take it.
165
29.84%
i'll be ordering one soon.......
98
17.72%
No thank you
116
20.98%
Voters: 553. You may not vote on this poll
Thoughts on the new corvette?
#2567
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Would a person really choose a NA engine like the 996 M6 or even the Mezger over the 9A2, which has better metallurgical properties as well as redesigned water and oil pump systems? Not to mention that the 9A2 would be more efficient to drive and more cost efficient to service?
Sure, if one is comparing the 9A2 to the 9A2 Evo, then I can see the choice of NA (the 9A2 Evo) over the FI (the 9A2) based on the preference for NA over FI, but as an absolute statement?
#2568
I'm always a bit puzzled by statements like this.
Would a person really choose a NA engine like the 996 M6 or even the Mezger over the 9A2, which has better metallurgical properties as well as redesigned water and oil pump systems? Not to mention that the 9A2 would be more efficient to drive and more cost efficient to service?
Sure, if one is comparing the 9A2 to the 9A2 Evo, then I can see the choice of NA (the 9A2 Evo) over the FI (the 9A2) based on the preference for NA over FI, but as an absolute statement?
Would a person really choose a NA engine like the 996 M6 or even the Mezger over the 9A2, which has better metallurgical properties as well as redesigned water and oil pump systems? Not to mention that the 9A2 would be more efficient to drive and more cost efficient to service?
Sure, if one is comparing the 9A2 to the 9A2 Evo, then I can see the choice of NA (the 9A2 Evo) over the FI (the 9A2) based on the preference for NA over FI, but as an absolute statement?
#2569
Rennlist Member
Say what you will about Fieros -- I've never driven one, don't know anything about them -- but you will seldom meet a more loyal, or more butthurt, group of car enthusiasts. Those guys are still murderously resentful towards GM for killing the Fiero just as they were on the verge of getting it right.
#2570
Instructor
IF they'd made a Quad4 Fiero with a 5-speed with the later suspension upgrades, that woulda been a kick-*** 2500-lb. mid-engine sports car in 1988! If they'da also fixed that interior...
#2571
Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I'm always a bit puzzled by statements like this.
Would a person really choose a NA engine like the 996 M6 or even the Mezger over the 9A2, which has better metallurgical properties as well as redesigned water and oil pump systems? Not to mention that the 9A2 would be more efficient to drive and more cost efficient to service?
Sure, if one is comparing the 9A2 to the 9A2 Evo, then I can see the choice of NA (the 9A2 Evo) over the FI (the 9A2) based on the preference for NA over FI, but as an absolute statement?
Would a person really choose a NA engine like the 996 M6 or even the Mezger over the 9A2, which has better metallurgical properties as well as redesigned water and oil pump systems? Not to mention that the 9A2 would be more efficient to drive and more cost efficient to service?
Sure, if one is comparing the 9A2 to the 9A2 Evo, then I can see the choice of NA (the 9A2 Evo) over the FI (the 9A2) based on the preference for NA over FI, but as an absolute statement?
As such the C8 is an incredible bargain and I celebrate its existence. That said neither of my cars will be getting traded towards it as I'm happy with the current stable.
The following users liked this post:
CaymanCarver (08-25-2019)
#2573
Originally Posted by Psorcery
It's a coping mechanism displayed only by 991.1 owners who need to replay the same statement in different wording over and over again. Bemo shops price, not engine. Ask him how much he got off MSRP.. If not for the discount he'd be driving something else that's turbo.
Drop me a PM, I'll school you free of charge!
Then maybe you can return the favor as I paid new M3 money for an old M3 from EAG...so much for being skilled when I was chasing a unicorn...naturally aspirated of course.
I will never buy a turbo car.
To stay on topic, go C8!!!
A pure V8 rumble plopped behind your ears for around $70-80k is a steal. Maybe I'll look for a used one in couple of years.
The following users liked this post:
CaymanCarver (08-25-2019)
#2574
Did I see you in the thread about dumphukts that bought an SUV barely larger than some sports cars with such a high torsional rigidity it flips on slight off camber off-road inclines but it has a nice badge and transports rugrats and demanding wives surrounded by an air of affluence that a Lexus no longer satisfies? The same thread that ends because no owners could dispute that they accept the $40K over 5 year depreciation because...well that part was never justified other than to get on the next GT wait list with a slightly smaller ADM.
#2575
#2576
Race Director
Originally Posted by Psorcery
It's a coping mechanism displayed only by 991.1 owners who need to replay the same statement in different wording over and over again. Bemo shops price, not engine. Ask him how much he got off MSRP.. If not for the discount he'd be driving something else that's turbo.
I'm always confused by useless statements like this trying to discredit someone's opinion.
By the way, what the hell does it matter what discount he got on a car purchase?
#2577
#2578
#2579
Pro
Real specs for the C8?