Cautionary Tale of Oil Leak (timing cover)
#331
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Biggest potential issue is engine fire as the oil coats more and more components including hot exhaust parts. And before anyone says "engine oil isn't flammable", no, not in the sense of like gasoline but it can very much still burn. https://firefighterinsider.com/is-mo...-be-surprised/ Fortunately the exhaust components on the Macan are pretty far back and the oil leaks at the very front. I'd guess this is the main reason why Porsche hasn't had to issue a recall. Oil can still get to weird places though.
Other than that, it will also get all over electrical connectors and belts. Essentially things that don't like oil on them. So catastrophic engine failure is unlikely but ruining other components is pretty likely.
Other than that, it will also get all over electrical connectors and belts. Essentially things that don't like oil on them. So catastrophic engine failure is unlikely but ruining other components is pretty likely.
#332
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Vehicle: 2016 Cayenne GTS (3.6L TT) / mileage: 38K / leak discovered ~7K miles ago
What is the technical harm in not correcting a leaky timing cover?
I read most the above but didn’t see this question either asked or answered. And I don’t intend this question to be rhetorical, sarcastic, or attempting to “troll” in some manner. Truly curious to know the tradeoff in risk for not having the engine pulled and new (potentially still faulty) bolts put back in? The obvious outcomes of not performing the repair are 1) the engine will leak oil and that is messy 2) the engine will leak oil and “at this price we should expect perfection”. But what are the other real or potential unfavorable outcomes? Do other components on the front belt assembly get fouled due to oil and thus fail? Is there chance of complete timing cover failure / separation thus potential for catastrophic engine failure? I don’t know thus why I’m asking.
What is the technical harm in not correcting a leaky timing cover?
I read most the above but didn’t see this question either asked or answered. And I don’t intend this question to be rhetorical, sarcastic, or attempting to “troll” in some manner. Truly curious to know the tradeoff in risk for not having the engine pulled and new (potentially still faulty) bolts put back in? The obvious outcomes of not performing the repair are 1) the engine will leak oil and that is messy 2) the engine will leak oil and “at this price we should expect perfection”. But what are the other real or potential unfavorable outcomes? Do other components on the front belt assembly get fouled due to oil and thus fail? Is there chance of complete timing cover failure / separation thus potential for catastrophic engine failure? I don’t know thus why I’m asking.
The following users liked this post:
engin_ear (04-23-2024)
#336
Intermediate
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The timing chain cover uses dozens of these Torx socket head bolts. They are made of aluminum. The bolt above snapped in half right at the gasket. It was the bolt snapping that caused the leak.
Apparently these M6 bolts are a torque-to-a-low-spec (8 n-m) plus 90-degrees. The standard torque for a steel grade 8 M6 is 10 n-m. That 90 degrees probably puts it at 15+ n-m which is breaking territory for a steel bolt.
Aluminum bolts. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
When this job is done out-of-warranty by an Indy, I'm gonna bet good-ole-fashioned steel bolts go in.
Apparently these M6 bolts are a torque-to-a-low-spec (8 n-m) plus 90-degrees. The standard torque for a steel grade 8 M6 is 10 n-m. That 90 degrees probably puts it at 15+ n-m which is breaking territory for a steel bolt.
Aluminum bolts. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
When this job is done out-of-warranty by an Indy, I'm gonna bet good-ole-fashioned steel bolts go in.
I know it’s an old post:
knew they were aluminum bolts and I understand why, expansion and contraction as the engine heats and cools. Plus all steel bolts will increase engine weight. But the extra 90 degree TTY turn according to your calculations is too much. And it’s not like we can back them off 45 degrees, cause there already stretched.
appreciate the info and this makes the most sense to me. Very objective conclusion.
I bought a 2018 CPO GTS w 37K and had the dealer put it on the lift, and I visually inspected everything before I left. A pre flight check to make sure the car is safe before my long drive home. I got a good look at the cars actual condition, and was quite surprised!
#337
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know it’s an old post:
knew they were aluminum bolts and I understand why, expansion and contraction as the engine heats and cools. Plus all steel bolts will increase engine weight. But the extra 90 degree TTY turn according to your calculations is too much. And it’s not like we can back them off 45 degrees, cause there already stretched.
appreciate the info and this makes the most sense to me. Very objective conclusion.
I bought a 2018 CPO GTS w 37K and had the dealer put it on the lift, and I visually inspected everything before I left. A pre flight check to make sure the car is safe before my long drive home. I got a good look at the cars actual condition, and was quite surprised!
knew they were aluminum bolts and I understand why, expansion and contraction as the engine heats and cools. Plus all steel bolts will increase engine weight. But the extra 90 degree TTY turn according to your calculations is too much. And it’s not like we can back them off 45 degrees, cause there already stretched.
appreciate the info and this makes the most sense to me. Very objective conclusion.
I bought a 2018 CPO GTS w 37K and had the dealer put it on the lift, and I visually inspected everything before I left. A pre flight check to make sure the car is safe before my long drive home. I got a good look at the cars actual condition, and was quite surprised!
#339
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#340
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,505
Received 1,643 Likes
on
1,072 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Meh. A properly electroplated steel bolt will do just fine, for decades, in an aluminum hole. If said hole is for a water jacket surface, or fastener is not plated, then a little bit of copper-based anti-seize does the trick.
The following users liked this post:
cbracerx (11-08-2021)
#341
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,505
Received 1,643 Likes
on
1,072 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wait…
… I now better understand your post.
Right: the aluminum fasters have been stretched beyond their elastic range. Whether or not they were intended to be single-use bolts originally, they are in practice.
IMO, Aluminum bolts were not selected due to expansion/contraction. Steel bolts would have been just fine if either electroplated or otherwise properly coated(*).
Aluminum was selected for other reasons. My *bet* would be because they are both cheaper and lighter than steel. Those are true statements, but PAG may have had additional/other reasons.
(*) The 928 engine is all aluminum with steel fasteners. I spend many 100s of hours per year turning those fasteners on all ages of 928s.
knew they were aluminum bolts and I understand why, expansion and contraction as the engine heats and cools. Plus all steel bolts will increase engine weight. But the extra 90 degree TTY turn according to your calculations is too much. And it’s not like we can back them off 45 degrees, cause there already stretched.
Right: the aluminum fasters have been stretched beyond their elastic range. Whether or not they were intended to be single-use bolts originally, they are in practice.
IMO, Aluminum bolts were not selected due to expansion/contraction. Steel bolts would have been just fine if either electroplated or otherwise properly coated(*).
Aluminum was selected for other reasons. My *bet* would be because they are both cheaper and lighter than steel. Those are true statements, but PAG may have had additional/other reasons.
(*) The 928 engine is all aluminum with steel fasteners. I spend many 100s of hours per year turning those fasteners on all ages of 928s.
#342
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Holy cow, I need a degree in metallurgy, meteorology, whatever, just to understand what y'all are talking about. Popped bolts, nothing new here for Porsche.
The following users liked this post:
HymieP (10-01-2021)
#344
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
New member. First post. Would appreciate any helpful advice.
I have a 2016 Macan S that I bought new. Low mileage, about 26K. Love the car. Not driven much during pandemic.
Took it in last week for scheduled / overdue major service, and the inspection turned up this oil leak at the timing cover. I've learned a lot about that now from reading this thread.
Repair estimate is for 50 hours of labor and about $14,000. Out of warranty. Does that seem excessive?
Would it be a good idea to seek another estimate from an independent repair shop, if I can find one?
It's also almost time for PDK service and new tires, which would cost another $2400 combined.
The car had a trade value of about $37,000 before this oil leak diagnosis. It's hard for me to come to grips with spending nearly half that trade value in order to keep the car, so I'm thinking about trading it in on something else.
Thanks for any thoughts.
I have a 2016 Macan S that I bought new. Low mileage, about 26K. Love the car. Not driven much during pandemic.
Took it in last week for scheduled / overdue major service, and the inspection turned up this oil leak at the timing cover. I've learned a lot about that now from reading this thread.
Repair estimate is for 50 hours of labor and about $14,000. Out of warranty. Does that seem excessive?
Would it be a good idea to seek another estimate from an independent repair shop, if I can find one?
It's also almost time for PDK service and new tires, which would cost another $2400 combined.
The car had a trade value of about $37,000 before this oil leak diagnosis. It's hard for me to come to grips with spending nearly half that trade value in order to keep the car, so I'm thinking about trading it in on something else.
Thanks for any thoughts.
#345
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
New member. First post. Would appreciate any helpful advice.
I have a 2016 Macan S that I bought new. Low mileage, about 26K. Love the car. Not driven much during pandemic.
Took it in last week for scheduled / overdue major service, and the inspection turned up this oil leak at the timing cover. I've learned a lot about that now from reading this thread.
Repair estimate is for 50 hours of labor and about $14,000. Out of warranty. Does that seem excessive?
Would it be a good idea to seek another estimate from an independent repair shop, if I can find one?
It's also almost time for PDK service and new tires, which would cost another $2400 combined.
The car had a trade value of about $37,000 before this oil leak diagnosis. It's hard for me to come to grips with spending nearly half that trade value in order to keep the car, so I'm thinking about trading it in on something else.
Thanks for any thoughts.
I have a 2016 Macan S that I bought new. Low mileage, about 26K. Love the car. Not driven much during pandemic.
Took it in last week for scheduled / overdue major service, and the inspection turned up this oil leak at the timing cover. I've learned a lot about that now from reading this thread.
Repair estimate is for 50 hours of labor and about $14,000. Out of warranty. Does that seem excessive?
Would it be a good idea to seek another estimate from an independent repair shop, if I can find one?
It's also almost time for PDK service and new tires, which would cost another $2400 combined.
The car had a trade value of about $37,000 before this oil leak diagnosis. It's hard for me to come to grips with spending nearly half that trade value in order to keep the car, so I'm thinking about trading it in on something else.
Thanks for any thoughts.
The following users liked this post:
PCARNTHZST (10-12-2021)