Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

GT4 G81 Transmission Failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2017, 11:48 AM
  #586  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bk_911
Using fremont? I hope they put you in a turbo 911 loaner in the meantime at least. If they have them of course.
Yup. No loaner needed. Got word I will get the car back next week!

Originally Posted by GTgears
Part number change means nothing. They always have a different part number for replacements. It allows them to track it and once they run out of brand new gearboxes they will plug in rebuilt/repaired gearboxes under the same number.
Good point. They never changed the part number after they ditched the spline and switched to welded design, right?
Old 02-16-2017, 12:11 PM
  #587  
trebien
Racer
 
trebien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: TX & CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTgears
Part number change means nothing. They always have a different part number for replacements. It allows them to track it and once they run out of brand new gearboxes they will plug in rebuilt/repaired gearboxes under the same number.
My information sources suggest that with the new part number, came a manufacturing change. Whether this is an intermediate "beta" change to try a fix, or the final change that will ultimately be implemented, who knows.

Concurrently, there are 2 part numbers floating around for the GT4 gearbox. The old part number, of which there is ample supply in the US... and presumably still has the flawed 3rd gear interface. And the new part number, of which there is highly limited supply (essentially 0) in Germany at the mothership inventory.

This new part number for the boxes in Germany supposedly has a different 3rd gear design, but I have neither opened one up NOR travelled to Untergruppenbach to waterboard Getrag's CEO, so I can not 100% guarantee this to be true; simply passing on info.

What I DO know, and we can all likely agree upon, is that Porsche will be very tight-lipped about this issue, the details, how many cars affected, what is the exact engineering fix, etc.... public owner transparency has never been their strong suite.
Old 02-16-2017, 12:55 PM
  #588  
Dr. Ferdinand
Rennlist Member
 
Dr. Ferdinand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North of 6,000 RPM
Posts: 1,702
Received 222 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTgears
Part number change means nothing. They always have a different part number for replacements. It allows them to track it and once they run out of brand new gearboxes they will plug in rebuilt/repaired gearboxes under the same number.
+981. VAG plays this game to perfection. On my B7 RS 4, which platform was plagued by leaky DRC (Dynamic Ride Control) suspension, Audi came up with several part numbers, revision "-a", "-b", and "-c". Guess what - they all had issues!

This BTW was exactly what had happened on the then-prior generation RS 6, which resulted in a Class Action Law Suit against Audi NA, and the claimants won (it helps when several RS6 owners were vocal lawyers!) The settlement resulted in Audi paying RS6 owners a specified amount (and in cases where those owners had gone with an aftermarket setup due to the chronically failing factory DRC suspension - a full reimbursement of their cost). With the RS 4 we followed a similar strategy, where after 3 repeated attempts I had enough and opted for an aftermarket suspension (Ohlins), and was later reimbursed by Audi NA (to the tune of $5,500, which isn't a small chuck of change). Not saying it was a slam dunk (as of course they wanted to reimburse the ppl who had documented failures and proof Audi counldn't remedy it after several attempts), but having 50+ pages of proof helped! (incl email exchanges with Audi staff, from the service adviser, to the service manager, to regional techs!)

Another thing I know having dealt with both Audi NA and BMW NA customer service - the ppl that you speak to are actually NOT Audi/BMW employees! It is actually a 3rd party company! Porsche may be different but I doubt it. Only if you escalate the case (i.e. figuratively scream and shout for some time and be a hyena) would you actually end up connecting with someone from Corporate, where finally things get to move. So while I wouldn't say outright that speaking to customer service is a waste of time, I would temper your expectation of what they can actually do...
Old 02-16-2017, 01:35 PM
  #589  
4carl
Race Car
 
4carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: santa barbara
Posts: 3,926
Received 1,186 Likes on 635 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. Ferdinand
+981. VAG plays this game to perfection. On my B7 RS 4, which platform was plagued by leaky DRC (Dynamic Ride Control) suspension, Audi came up with several part numbers, revision "-a", "-b", and "-c". Guess what - they all had issues!

This BTW was exactly what had happened on the then-prior generation RS 6, which resulted in a Class Action Law Suit against Audi NA, and the claimants won (it helps when several RS6 owners were vocal lawyers!) The settlement resulted in Audi paying RS6 owners a specified amount (and in cases where those owners had gone with an aftermarket setup due to the chronically failing factory DRC suspension - a full reimbursement of their cost). With the RS 4 we followed a similar strategy, where after 3 repeated attempts I had enough and opted for an aftermarket suspension (Ohlins), and was later reimbursed by Audi NA (to the tune of $5,500, which isn't a small chuck of change). Not saying it was a slam dunk (as of course they wanted to reimburse the ppl who had documented failures and proof Audi counldn't remedy it after several attempts), but having 50+ pages of proof helped! (incl email exchanges with Audi staff, from the service adviser, to the service manager, to regional techs!)

Another thing I know having dealt with both Audi NA and BMW NA customer service - the ppl that you speak to are actually NOT Audi/BMW employees! It is actually a 3rd party company! Porsche may be different but I doubt it. Only if you escalate the case (i.e. figuratively scream and shout for some time and be a hyena) would you actually end up connecting with someone from Corporate, where finally things get to move. So while I wouldn't say outright that speaking to customer service is a waste of time, I would temper your expectation of what they can actually do...
send the thread out to some of the online blogs and websites like automotive news.
Old 02-16-2017, 01:41 PM
  #590  
Gofishracing
Race Car
 
Gofishracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,935
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

part number the same- No change in manufacturing I'm told.
Old 02-16-2017, 04:26 PM
  #591  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 2,151
Received 622 Likes on 379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Yup. No loaner needed. Got word I will get the car back next week!
That was quick! Obviously they did not want to be featured in "Orthojoe's GT4 track thread"

My car is a July 2015 build, those where 3rd gear will wait until the car is out of warranty to fail!
Old 02-16-2017, 04:40 PM
  #592  
trebien
Racer
 
trebien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: TX & CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okie981
And the part number is?
Originally Posted by Gofishracing
part number the same- No change in manufacturing I'm told.

From my understanding:

Old Part #981 300 202 22

New Part #981 300 020 BX
Old 02-16-2017, 04:50 PM
  #593  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RDCR
That was quick! Obviously they did not want to be featured in "Orthojoe's GT4 track thread"

My car is a July 2015 build, those where 3rd gear will wait until the car is out of warranty to fail!
If my theory holds, I think it will be fine. I don't think there are any failures from cars built before 11/2015
Old 02-16-2017, 04:55 PM
  #594  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,692
Received 281 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
From my understanding:

Old Part #981 300 202 22

New Part #981 300 020 BX
Here's where to check;
http://nemiga.com/cat_spares/pet/por...4/545u/302000/
Old 02-16-2017, 05:06 PM
  #595  
Dr. Ferdinand
Rennlist Member
 
Dr. Ferdinand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North of 6,000 RPM
Posts: 1,702
Received 222 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4carl
send the thread out to some of the online blogs and websites like automotive news.
Solid advice, and it has been done before - with fairly good success.

Here is a good example. Years ago I corroborated with Edmunds.com to expose as well known issue (despite VAG's efforts to not formally acknowledge) related to Carbon Buildup, that significantly/adversely affects their FSI engines (from the 2.0 TFSI - through the 4.2FSI as found on the RS4/R8 - to the 5.2FSI engine in the S6). We worked with several owners and proved (through both formal dynos and DME logs) the detriment of CB as it relates to performance.

The car depicted in the Edmunds story below showed a 45awhp attrition (that's 60+ crank HP factoring awd parasitic losses)! All of that was restored after a dealer-provided CB clean (which is a nasty and laborious task, especially on V8 and V10 engines). We had several cars as data points, all on the same dyno, operator, strapping system, ambient conditions, even in some cases - same tank of gas (cars dynoed pre-clean and then immediately post scrub)! The car depicted herein had gone through interim dynoes so you can follow the power losses every 5-7K miles in between carbon cleans.

The Edmunds findings went viral, and thanks to that a lot of customers were able to get 'free' CB scrubs (~$1,500 in almost entirely labor). Audi never acknowledged it formally/publicly, yet if you walk into most dealership today they have a 'fuel system clean special' advertised abound. If you actually were to read their patent documentation, their own engineers have gone on the record as describing the potential ill effects. Of course we all know that now, but this is back circa 07-08 when DFI wasn't mainstream.

Here is the actual article, sadly it appears somewhat taken down (wonder why?!) and the images (e.g. dyno results) don't display unless you right-click them, but the text of the article is still there.

https://www.edmunds.com/autoobserver...-adopters.html
Old 02-16-2017, 11:52 PM
  #596  
GTgears
Nordschleife Master
 
GTgears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,164
Received 123 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Traditionally the part numbers ending in X instead of a number are the remanufactured replacement units.
Old 02-17-2017, 12:48 AM
  #597  
4carl
Race Car
 
4carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: santa barbara
Posts: 3,926
Received 1,186 Likes on 635 Posts
Default

Is there any actual proof that in fact the early transmissions prior to nov 15 were actually splined? Or is it just a bad batch of welds?
Old 02-17-2017, 01:10 AM
  #598  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4carl
Is there any actual proof that in fact the early transmissions prior to nov 15 were actually splined? Or is it just a bad batch of welds?
No proof. Just theories
Old 02-17-2017, 02:39 AM
  #599  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,479
Received 1,062 Likes on 548 Posts
Default

I believe a few of these have had upgraded/changed gears. Anyone have any data on what was in those transmissions and a build date?
Old 02-19-2017, 09:03 AM
  #600  
Gofishracing
Race Car
 
Gofishracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,935
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

is this correct /same transmission as GT4 ? From AfterSalesTraining.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: GT4 G81 Transmission Failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:21 AM.