I am not going with the new 991.2
#151
#152
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I love all 911's!
I tried to buy a used 2013, and a CPO 2015 but the dealership would not budge on price and figured that if I was going to pay anywhere close to 89k for a used car I might as well get a brand new 2017. I really love my 991.2 but I would have really loved the 991.1 as well. I am also very happy with the way my 991.2 sounds and drives. Although I will have to say that my Macan S does sound somewhat better. :-)
Cheers!
I tried to buy a used 2013, and a CPO 2015 but the dealership would not budge on price and figured that if I was going to pay anywhere close to 89k for a used car I might as well get a brand new 2017. I really love my 991.2 but I would have really loved the 991.1 as well. I am also very happy with the way my 991.2 sounds and drives. Although I will have to say that my Macan S does sound somewhat better. :-)
Cheers!
#154
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
33 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
10 pages discussing the sex of the angels? OMG!
The truth is, 991.2 is better than the 991.1 in every single aspect. Period. Whoever say otherwise doesn't know what is talking about.
My NA sounds better (subjective) than your faster, more refined, high-tech, confortable and best looking (subjective) car. LOL.
Enjoy your 911
993, 996, 997 or 991
The truth is, 991.2 is better than the 991.1 in every single aspect. Period. Whoever say otherwise doesn't know what is talking about.
My NA sounds better (subjective) than your faster, more refined, high-tech, confortable and best looking (subjective) car. LOL.
Enjoy your 911
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#155
Intermediate
#156
Race Car
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Idaho on countdown
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 655 Likes
on
378 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
R_Rated and Dewinator........
This thread is made for them. They are President and VP of the .1 Knights in Shining Armor Brigade and .2 He Man Carrera Haters Club......![typing](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/yltype.gif)
This thread is made for them. They are President and VP of the .1 Knights in Shining Armor Brigade and .2 He Man Carrera Haters Club......
![typing](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/yltype.gif)
![Cheers](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/beerchug.gif)
![cherrsagai](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/drink.gif)
![evilgrin](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
Last edited by JustBud; 04-20-2017 at 12:07 AM.
#157
Rennlist Member
#158
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nobody seemed to mention the fact that the only reason Porsche went to all Turbo motors is because of EPA continuing to crack down harder and harder. They did the best they could but I would bet, Porsche would have much rather continued with NA engines. There is a place for Turbo engines but IMO they should not all be Turbos.
#159
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Different strokes for different folks. I am a big fan of the 991.1 NA 3.8 and I loved my 991.1 NA 3.4 prior to that. I just love the rear engine, NA driving experience. That being said, turbocharged 911s have had a formidable place in the 911 lineup since the 1970's and even moreso now with the 991.2 lineup. I agree with 2008porsche - it is a shame that the NA engine is being phased out; it has been part of the 911 DNA since its inception in the 1960's and to lose that, with the exception of the GT line, is a shame to me and to many others, but not to everyone. I, for one, am glad that I took the plunge for the 991.1 GTS. Yes, we 991.1 GTS enthusiasts get ribbed on this forum for making our version of the 911 sound like amazing sex on wheels and I hope whatever iteration of the 911 that you are driving is as good as or even better than sex on wheels.
#160
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Holy crap. Is this thread really 16 pages? I got thru 4, so if this has been said before just ignore it. And it has nothing to do with a 991 but this thread as a whole. To the jack asses who say newer and faster is always better period, I say see 993 and 996.
BTW, I consider the 996 to be superior than the 993 in every aspect and probably the best 911 ever, and I am in the minority because most people will say the 993 was better
BTW, I consider the 996 to be superior than the 993 in every aspect and probably the best 911 ever, and I am in the minority because most people will say the 993 was better
#161
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As with everything, there are facts and opinions, and humans to confuse the two.
What we like is almost always driven entirely by opinion, and full of subjective feelings. I have long been a fan of endurance racing. I love the brutal style of the 917, and will always consider the 956/962 my favorite. But in terms of lap times and race success, both would look sad compared to any recent race model (and even some street cars).
With Porsche engineering development, we can count on each model out-performing the previous, both on the street and on the track--and I love that about the brand. Does it also guarantee it will make you happier? The marketing division wishes so, but that's up to you.
What we like is almost always driven entirely by opinion, and full of subjective feelings. I have long been a fan of endurance racing. I love the brutal style of the 917, and will always consider the 956/962 my favorite. But in terms of lap times and race success, both would look sad compared to any recent race model (and even some street cars).
With Porsche engineering development, we can count on each model out-performing the previous, both on the street and on the track--and I love that about the brand. Does it also guarantee it will make you happier? The marketing division wishes so, but that's up to you.
#162
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You're data is worthless. As I explained in my other post, there is something emotional connected with the perfection of the NA flat 6. You're never going to convince us that the boosted engine is more fun ever.
You have the same chances of converting a liberal to fiscal responsibility with a meme on Facebook.
You have the same chances of converting a liberal to fiscal responsibility with a meme on Facebook.
#163
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Come on' no need to insult us little base Carrera owners. We are sensitive as it is.....
#165
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 26,141
Likes: 0
Received 5,410 Likes
on
2,516 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 2008porsche
Nobody seemed to mention the fact that the only reason Porsche went to all Turbo motors is because of EPA continuing to crack down harder and harder. They did the best they could but I would bet, Porsche would have much rather continued with NA engines. There is a place for Turbo engines but IMO they should not all be Turbos.