Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I am not going with the new 991.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2017, 04:03 PM
  #196  
2008porsche
Rennlist Member
 
2008porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 991.2

Originally Posted by 911seeker
Bad news for everyone:
-.1 guys: we don't have the latest and greatest
-.2 guys: some people don't want to have your car over the .1

Now everyone can get on with their daily obbligations, what a relief...
When you are driving a high end sports car field effeciency is not an issue. It's all about speed, sound, handling and the overall driving experience. The new 991.2 just doesn't give you the whole package. You can spin it all you want but it's just not there. When you have to hire people to computerize the sound in a sports car, you have made a HUGE mistake!! That is what Porsche has done.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:29 PM
  #197  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JustBud
R_Rated and Dewinator........

This thread is made for them. They are President and VP of the .1 Knights in Shining Armor Brigade and .2 He Man Carrera Haters Club......

Hmm I wanted to be Chancellor! Is it an executive president position or is there a separate CEO?
Old 04-20-2017, 04:30 PM
  #198  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2008porsche
When you are driving a high end sports car field effeciency is not an issue. It's all about speed, sound, handling and the overall driving experience. The new 991.2 just doesn't give you the whole package. You can spin it all you want but it's just not there. When you have to hire people to computerize the sound in a sports car, you have made a HUGE mistake!! That is what Porsche has done.
Sounds oh so terrible



And, um, isn't the handling and speed better? So WTF are you talking about? What is missing? Definitely not torque...
Old 04-20-2017, 04:32 PM
  #199  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2008porsche
When you are driving a high end sports car field effeciency is not an issue. It's all about speed, sound, handling and the overall driving experience. The new 991.2 just doesn't give you the whole package. You can spin it all you want but it's just not there. When you have to hire people to computerize the sound in a sports car, you have made a HUGE mistake!! That is what Porsche has done.
what you're describing is a tesla, which is faster to 60 than a 911, has better electric gadgetry and is slightly more efficient.

if it's just performance turning then you want a vette or a GTR for a lot less money.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:37 PM
  #200  
Daekwan
Advanced
 
Daekwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
Just my opinion. I've read all of the reviews and drove a new 991.2 for two days as a loaner while my 991.1 was in for service. I usually trade every ~3 years for a new 911.

I love my old 2014 911 with it's 3.4L non-turbo engine. I've owned many of them along with the 996.

I see no reason to upgrade at $50k+ to get a newer but inferior car.
I would have respected your statement more if you said there is not a $50K difference between a 991.1 C2 and a 991.2 C2. But to call the new 991.2 inferior.. makes it seem like you just couldnt afford the upgrade and are now looking for a way to justify it.

I get that some people prefer N/A. But by all means outside of the turbo'd engines.. everything else on the 991.2 is an improvement. Some are pretty major.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:38 PM
  #201  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan
I would have respected your statement more if you said there is not a $50K difference between a 991.1 C2 and a 991.2 C2. But to call the new 991.2 inferior.. makes it seem like you just couldnt afford the upgrade and are now looking for a way to justify it.

I get that some people prefer N/A. But by all means outside of the turbo'd engines.. everything else on the 991.2 is an improvement. Some are pretty major.
He avoids the GT3 because it is also inferior...
Old 04-20-2017, 04:41 PM
  #202  
Jenner
Burning Brakes
 
Jenner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1 hour from Lime Rock Park
Posts: 1,223
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2008porsche
It's all about speed, sound, handling and the overall driving experience. The new 991.2 just doesn't give you the whole package. You can spin it all you want but it's just not there.

When you have to hire people to computerize the sound in a sports car, you have made a HUGE mistake!! That is what Porsche has done.
Speed: The 991.2 is faster
Handling: The 991.2 handles better and even more so with RWS option.

No need to spin anything. These are facts. Can you explain what is "not there?"

Sound is subjective, but most agree the 991.1 sounds better which is fine. But sound alone doesn't "make the car."

I have no idea what you mean by overall driving experience. What does the 991.2 do worse besides sound? They both share the same 991 platform and interior. Transmissions are very similar with maybe some tweaks to the PDK in the .2 I believe there is better tuned electric power steering in the .2 as well.

Taking sound out totally out of the .1 vs .2 argument, then what is the big issue with the .2? (aside from .1 owners don't own a .2 and feel the need to defend what they own. I GET that you own it and you will ALWAYS be more emotionally and financially invested in what YOU own and that's fine)

I don't understand why there is so much anger against the .2 from the .1 and I've never seen a car make/model specific forum with owners against each other over a model year refresh.

I've owned several Porsche of ALL different types and years: air cooled, air cooled turbo, water cooled, water cooled turbo, GT3 and GT4, coupes, cabs and Targa. I have tracked nearly all of them and the 991.2 I drove @ PEC was amazing on the track. I have modified the exhaust on all of them. I have no issues with the 991.2 turbo engine or the sound. Sure the .2 wasn't loud enough but I've modified every exhaust on every performance car I've owned. I am thrilled with the Fabspeed exhaust package I put on.

Not the best video but sounds like a throaty boxer engine with a some turbo whistle mixed in at times (not me in the video):

Facebook Post

.

I enjoy the sound, even more so when the top is down. I'm sorry if you don't but why the need to force your opinion on the sound on everyone else? I don't get what you guys are all on about. I don't ever feel the need to come on to Rennlist and post negative comments about the .1 but it seems like all you .1 guys (esp R_Rated) want to do is **** all over the .2 which really isn't that different from your own .1 (except its faster and handles better )

Where is the mutual Porsche/911 respect? Why is there so much negativity?

Last edited by Jenner; 04-20-2017 at 04:58 PM.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:50 PM
  #203  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,880 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Other than sound, the .2 is a better car. Not sure why it's even a debate. I'm still not sold on buying one, but it's definitely a better car than my .1

By the way that Affymetrix exhaust a few posts above sounds awful. And that whistle! That goddam whistle. That would drive me nuts.
Old 04-20-2017, 04:51 PM
  #204  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,757
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Wait till you bring in the 997.2 guys. They'll troll on all of us
Old 04-20-2017, 05:12 PM
  #205  
Kennethjk
Instructor
 
Kennethjk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Rockland County NY
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what a thread, my head hurts, I should have stopped reading a long time ago but couldn't help myself

a lot of emotions over people opinions, oops, sounds like our political system.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:27 PM
  #206  
2008porsche
Rennlist Member
 
2008porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys.... I never said .2 was inferior nor did I say .1 was better. They are different. I prefer NA engine due to the sound which for me is part of the overall experience. Why can't all you guys just say .2 is different not better. Does one have to be better than the other. I do and will argue that Porsche should not have went to all Turbo engines (GT3 is the exception for now). To go from offering both Turbo and non Turbo to only Turbo is a mistake imo.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:39 PM
  #207  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2008porsche
Guys.... I never said .2 was inferior nor did I say .1 was better. They are different. I prefer NA engine due to the sound which for me is part of the overall experience. Why can't all you guys just say .2 is different not better. Does one have to be better than the other. I do and will argue that Porsche should not have went to all Turbo engines (GT3 is the exception for now). To go from offering both Turbo and non Turbo to only Turbo is a mistake imo.
Yeah I agree, I feel like on this forum you can't go "well the new has some improvements but not for me, I still like the old school engine" without 800 people jumping on you "what??! No you have to like the new one better! I'll prove it with graphs! It's so many times better in every way! You're so dumb!". They seem very sensitive to any suggestion that it's not the perfect car for every person.
Old 04-20-2017, 05:42 PM
  #208  
Porsche_nuts
Nordschleife Master
 
Porsche_nuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 5,519
Received 1,236 Likes on 748 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
By the way that Affymetrix exhaust a few posts above sounds awful. And that whistle! That goddam whistle. That would drive me nuts.
+991
Old 04-20-2017, 05:58 PM
  #209  
KenTO
Burning Brakes
 
KenTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,116
Received 561 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Some facts about the 991.2 GTS, thanks to Total911 (I'm expecting delivery of one in July):

1) The most powerful Carrera yet

We’ll say that again, 450hp, that up 30hp on the 420hp Porsche 911 Gen1 GTS it replaces. Astonishingly, that’s just 6hp shy of what the Porsche 959 produced, or, if you want a more contemporary reference, it’s the same power as a 997 Gen2 GT3 RS. Damn. Don’t you just love progress?


2) More torque than a GT3 RS

That hp figure is backed with some substantial twist, the boosted output of the 9A2 engine seeing its torque output increase from 500Nm in a Carrera S, to 550Nm from 2,150rpm right through to 5,000rpm. By comparison a 991 GT3 RS or 911 R only manages 460Nm, and at far higher revs…


3) Quicker than an R, faster than a GT3 RS

The quickest accelerating Porsche 911 GTS is the Carrera 4 GTS Coupe with PDK, it reaching 62mph in a 911 R bettering 3.6 seconds. You’ll not match that outright sprinting ability in the ‘true’ GTS manual Coupe, but with rear-wheel drive it makes the most of its lesser mass, being the fastest, with a quoted top speed of 194mph.

991.2 is a fantastic car.
Old 04-20-2017, 06:08 PM
  #210  
dgjks6
Drifting
 
dgjks6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,675
Received 254 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Is this thread still going? The 991.2 is .1 better than the 991.1.

That makes the 996.2 5 better

And that makes the 997.2 the best 911 ever.

It's a coincidence I drive 997.2 BTW


Quick Reply: I am not going with the new 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:54 AM.