Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I am not going with the new 991.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2017, 10:46 PM
  #1  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 18 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,358
Received 466 Likes on 237 Posts
Default I am not going with the new 991.2

Just my opinion. I've read all of the reviews and drove a new 991.2 for two days as a loaner while my 991.1 was in for service. I usually trade every ~3 years for a new 911.

I love my old 2014 911 with it's 3.4L non-turbo engine. I've owned many of them along with the 996.

I see no reason to upgrade at $50k+ to get a newer but inferior car.
Old 04-17-2017, 10:55 PM
  #2  
LehmanZ06
Pro
 
LehmanZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 688
Received 104 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

I would argue with you the inferior car statement. I am sure your car is wonderful, and obviously you won't take the depreciation hit of a new car.

Enjoy your car.
Old 04-17-2017, 10:57 PM
  #3  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,277
Received 2,298 Likes on 1,052 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LehmanZ06
I would argue with you the inferior car statement. I am sure your car is wonderful, and obviously you won't take the depreciation hit of a new car.

Enjoy your car.

+1
Old 04-17-2017, 11:06 PM
  #4  
bkrantz
Rennlist Member
 
bkrantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SW Colorado
Posts: 6,067
Likes: 0
Received 1,111 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

Inferior? Subjective.

Faster? Proven!
Old 04-17-2017, 11:16 PM
  #5  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,176
Received 6,509 Likes on 2,828 Posts
Default

This should be a productive thread
Old 04-17-2017, 11:29 PM
  #6  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 200 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

No need to stir this pot again ...
Old 04-17-2017, 11:29 PM
  #7  
seattle_sun
Pro
 
seattle_sun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Lol!
What a tool...
Old 04-17-2017, 11:29 PM
  #8  
GT3FZS
Rennlist Member
 
GT3FZS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 385
Received 213 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

I have a 2013 Base Coupe, manual, nicely equipped for sport and comfort. I love it, and will keep it at least another 2-3 years.
Just curious why you feel the .2 is "inferior"? Have not driven one yet, but would consider one as the next Porsche.
Any thoughts you want to share?
Thanks.
Old 04-17-2017, 11:33 PM
  #9  
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,669
Received 305 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
Just my opinion. I've read all of the reviews and drove a new 991.2 for two days as a loaner while my 991.1 was in for service. I usually trade every ~3 years for a new 911.

I love my old 2014 911 with it's 3.4L non-turbo engine. I've owned many of them along with the 996.

I see no reason to upgrade at $50k+ to get a newer but inferior car.
Understood that you see no reason to upgrade from .1 to .2, particularly if it's going to cost you $50k. What about the .2 do you find inferior?
Old 04-18-2017, 12:05 AM
  #10  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 18 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,358
Received 466 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PJ Cayenne
What about the .2 do you find inferior?
It didn't have the overall drive ability of the 991.1. The 3.4L is just a better sports car engine to me.

The little turbo 3.0L doesn't have the same road manners as before. It makes me want the real turbo 911.

It's JMO from driving and owning a lot of new Porsche 911's. This is an internet forum in which you can offer your opinion as you drive each model.
Old 04-18-2017, 12:23 AM
  #11  
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,669
Received 305 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

That explains it.
Old 04-18-2017, 01:04 AM
  #12  
dflowerz
Burning Brakes
 
dflowerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 834
Received 65 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I can understand your opinion about what the best 911 is for you. The 991.2 is inferior to you but superior to me. I drove a 911.1 with a 3.4 and really was disappointed with the engine. Doesn't really matter does it? Each of us finds a car that works for us and we are happy with it.
Old 04-18-2017, 01:33 AM
  #13  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,997
Received 1,036 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

To each their own I guess...but yeah, Ill add on that you're one of the few that would ever put it that way. While I agree that 50k premium to trade up would be a little dire, the newer version is definitely superior. Now if we were talking about a 3.8l NA GTS model vs a newer base, then we have a whole other thought process.
Old 04-18-2017, 01:40 AM
  #14  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Inferior = faster now? The 3.4 is a joke. Feel free to keep it as nobody wants it anyway.
Old 04-18-2017, 01:44 AM
  #15  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I'm with you man. Ford will tell you the new Raptor with the V6 ExoBoost is superior in every way: more horsepower, lighter, better fuel economy. But if I were buying a Raptor, it would have to be the 6.2L V8. It's just the only way to go.


Quick Reply: I am not going with the new 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:07 AM.