Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I am not going with the new 991.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2017 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
VintageRacer's Avatar
VintageRacer
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 468
From: 18 year member, North Georgia
Default I am not going with the new 991.2

Just my opinion. I've read all of the reviews and drove a new 991.2 for two days as a loaner while my 991.1 was in for service. I usually trade every ~3 years for a new 911.

I love my old 2014 911 with it's 3.4L non-turbo engine. I've owned many of them along with the 996.

I see no reason to upgrade at $50k+ to get a newer but inferior car.
Old 04-17-2017 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
LehmanZ06's Avatar
LehmanZ06
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 688
Likes: 104
From: South Florida
Default

I would argue with you the inferior car statement. I am sure your car is wonderful, and obviously you won't take the depreciation hit of a new car.

Enjoy your car.
Old 04-17-2017 | 10:57 PM
  #3  
subshooter's Avatar
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 2,382
From: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Default

Originally Posted by LehmanZ06
I would argue with you the inferior car statement. I am sure your car is wonderful, and obviously you won't take the depreciation hit of a new car.

Enjoy your car.

+1
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:06 PM
  #4  
bkrantz's Avatar
bkrantz
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 1,137
From: SW Colorado
Default

Inferior? Subjective.

Faster? Proven!
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
rk-d's Avatar
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,181
Likes: 6,516
Default

This should be a productive thread
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:29 PM
  #6  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

No need to stir this pot again ...
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:29 PM
  #7  
seattle_sun's Avatar
seattle_sun
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
Default

Lol!
What a tool...
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:29 PM
  #8  
GT3FZS's Avatar
GT3FZS
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 387
Likes: 213
From: Western Maryland
Default

I have a 2013 Base Coupe, manual, nicely equipped for sport and comfort. I love it, and will keep it at least another 2-3 years.
Just curious why you feel the .2 is "inferior"? Have not driven one yet, but would consider one as the next Porsche.
Any thoughts you want to share?
Thanks.
Old 04-17-2017 | 11:33 PM
  #9  
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 305
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
Just my opinion. I've read all of the reviews and drove a new 991.2 for two days as a loaner while my 991.1 was in for service. I usually trade every ~3 years for a new 911.

I love my old 2014 911 with it's 3.4L non-turbo engine. I've owned many of them along with the 996.

I see no reason to upgrade at $50k+ to get a newer but inferior car.
Understood that you see no reason to upgrade from .1 to .2, particularly if it's going to cost you $50k. What about the .2 do you find inferior?
Old 04-18-2017 | 12:05 AM
  #10  
VintageRacer's Avatar
VintageRacer
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 468
From: 18 year member, North Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by PJ Cayenne
What about the .2 do you find inferior?
It didn't have the overall drive ability of the 991.1. The 3.4L is just a better sports car engine to me.

The little turbo 3.0L doesn't have the same road manners as before. It makes me want the real turbo 911.

It's JMO from driving and owning a lot of new Porsche 911's. This is an internet forum in which you can offer your opinion as you drive each model.
Old 04-18-2017 | 12:23 AM
  #11  
PJ Cayenne's Avatar
PJ Cayenne
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 305
From: Connecticut
Default

That explains it.
Old 04-18-2017 | 01:04 AM
  #12  
dflowerz's Avatar
dflowerz
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 834
Likes: 65
From: El Dorado Hills, CA
Default

I can understand your opinion about what the best 911 is for you. The 991.2 is inferior to you but superior to me. I drove a 911.1 with a 3.4 and really was disappointed with the engine. Doesn't really matter does it? Each of us finds a car that works for us and we are happy with it.
Old 04-18-2017 | 01:33 AM
  #13  
sechsgang's Avatar
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 1,042
From: ...PA...
Default

To each their own I guess...but yeah, Ill add on that you're one of the few that would ever put it that way. While I agree that 50k premium to trade up would be a little dire, the newer version is definitely superior. Now if we were talking about a 3.8l NA GTS model vs a newer base, then we have a whole other thought process.
Old 04-18-2017 | 01:40 AM
  #14  
sticky's Avatar
sticky
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 7
From: Laguna, CA
Default

Inferior = faster now? The 3.4 is a joke. Feel free to keep it as nobody wants it anyway.
Old 04-18-2017 | 01:44 AM
  #15  
Dewinator's Avatar
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 44
Default

I'm with you man. Ford will tell you the new Raptor with the V6 ExoBoost is superior in every way: more horsepower, lighter, better fuel economy. But if I were buying a Raptor, it would have to be the 6.2L V8. It's just the only way to go.


Quick Reply: I am not going with the new 991.2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:02 AM.