Recall #AMC0 REPROGRAMMING TCU AND ECU
#61
"This software update .. has no impact on fuel consumption values for your vehicle, drivability, performance or safety."
Performance / fuel consumption at what RPM level?
Porsche could be correct that the HP / fuel consumption at the new lower level won't change from original... It just won't let you get to them at 7400rpm, would be the interpretation....
Performance / fuel consumption at what RPM level?
Porsche could be correct that the HP / fuel consumption at the new lower level won't change from original... It just won't let you get to them at 7400rpm, would be the interpretation....
#62
Rennlist Member
The EPA tests vehicles on a particular drive cycle. Accelerate at X toward speed Y, stop at Z # of traffic lights, and so forth. A car designed to shift near redline even at light throttle positions is not only going to waste a lot of gas for no reason, but will also look unnecessarily bad from a pollution standpoint.
The following users liked this post:
kechal (01-22-2022)
#66
#67
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,290
Received 608 Likes
on
416 Posts
But for track use, Sport+ in a PDK car is absolutely desirable. I never use Sport+ on street. Never. For track use, it's the first thing I turn before I go on track just before I use the spoiler button to fix the spoiler in the deployed position.
The following users liked this post:
ledbette (12-22-2021)
#68
The car will make the same MAXIMUM power whether it’s in sport+ or not. It’s the torque delivery that ramps up. This, combined with the super-fast gear change of the PDK, is what makes it a little quicker over a given distance. Thing is, it feels MUCH faster still. It’s this feeling you’re likely to lose, at least in part. Even if this doesn’t matter to you, it’s likely to matter to a prospective buyer if/when you come to sell.
#69
It would actually be nice if the PDK would shift earlier when throttle position is maybe < 20% and/or you're doing less than 30mph. It's one of those things I don't like when I'm leaving the grid. I either keep in Sport or manually shift to keep RPMs down before the oil reaches operating temp.
#70
It would actually be nice if the PDK would shift earlier when throttle position is maybe < 20% and/or you're doing less than 30mph. It's one of those things I don't like when I'm leaving the grid. I either keep in Sport or manually shift to keep RPMs down before the oil reaches operating temp.
No one is using 80-100% throttle flat out all the time and keeping the RPM up at 6-7K constantly on the street as you do on a track, so it seems that this logic could be implemented so the shift pattern changes between the two driving styles? This is the best of both worlds if actually true. I seem to recall I saw this over in the 991 update thread on the same subject matter, but not sure if the behavior would be different for us if true? Its easy enough to test by anyone that has done the update and let us know
Last edited by ICNU; 12-22-2021 at 03:30 PM.
#71
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,290
Received 608 Likes
on
416 Posts
It would actually be nice if the PDK would shift earlier when throttle position is maybe < 20% and/or you're doing less than 30mph. It's one of those things I don't like when I'm leaving the grid. I either keep in Sport or manually shift to keep RPMs down before the oil reaches operating temp.
There have been a few post that sort of hint that this "might" be what they have done, but I haven't seen anything conclusive from anyone at this point. One post elsewhere seemed to indicate that the Sport + mode is now streetable with the update when driving in a normal fashion, but will operate as before with near redline shifts when the throttle is being used very aggressively on the track.
No one is using 80-100% throttle flat out all the time and keeping the RPM up at 6-7K constantly on the street as you do on a track, so it seems that this logic could be implemented so the shift pattern changes between the two driving styles? This is the best of both worlds if actually true. I seem to recall I saw this over in the 991 update thread on the same subject matter, but not sure if the behavior would be different for us if true? Its easy enough to test by anyone that has done the update and let us know
No one is using 80-100% throttle flat out all the time and keeping the RPM up at 6-7K constantly on the street as you do on a track, so it seems that this logic could be implemented so the shift pattern changes between the two driving styles? This is the best of both worlds if actually true. I seem to recall I saw this over in the 991 update thread on the same subject matter, but not sure if the behavior would be different for us if true? Its easy enough to test by anyone that has done the update and let us know
Last edited by okie981; 12-22-2021 at 06:10 PM.
#72
Recall inadvertently deleted.
How lucky. Inadvertently deleted recall. I flashed an aftermarket tune but due to its ineffectiveness, I removed it. Bingo! Tune is gone and took the crappy recall with it. Eureka!
The following users liked this post:
Bummler (01-28-2022)
#74
Since it's officially optional, you can request that it not be performed, but in the Peoples Republic of CA, may not get that option. CA is getting really picky about things like this, and you may not get your smog cert if you don't have this recall performed. They are starting to look for unapproved ECU programming.
Last edited by ledbette; 03-02-2022 at 05:09 PM.
The following users liked this post:
BondJ (03-02-2022)
#75