Rennlist Top 10 HP/TQ
09-23-2005, 05:07 PM
#467
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I made a mistake in my previous post, DFASTEST951 rennlister (Joe) currently has and runs 52 LBS/HOUR @3.0 BAR FUEL PRESSURE ( Click here )
No Joe, i am not attacking you, just stating facts and the obvious. And i have yet to see a good and valid explanation, and NZ keep you're mouse away from the bad post report button, since you yet to have anything valid so far.
No Joe, i am not attacking you, just stating facts and the obvious. And i have yet to see a good and valid explanation, and NZ keep you're mouse away from the bad post report button, since you yet to have anything valid so far.
09-23-2005, 05:13 PM
#468
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright guys, I think there is some pretty serious confusion on here regarding the dynapack dynos. Here is a run that I did recently with my clutch slipping like it was covered in 5W-30! 
Please note that it says Flywheel TQ and HP. Also notice that the correction factor is 1.00. The TCF stands for total correction factor. If 1.15 was entered, the dyno would tack on 15% to the wheel numbers. If they enter 0.85 for a TCF, the dyno will knock 15% off the wheel number. 1.00 is what the car is making at the wheels. No matter what, "flywheel" is is what the dynapack chart will read.
Please note that it says Flywheel TQ and HP. Also notice that the correction factor is 1.00. The TCF stands for total correction factor. If 1.15 was entered, the dyno would tack on 15% to the wheel numbers. If they enter 0.85 for a TCF, the dyno will knock 15% off the wheel number. 1.00 is what the car is making at the wheels. No matter what, "flywheel" is is what the dynapack chart will read.
09-23-2005, 05:16 PM
#469
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by tedwright
Alright guys, I think there is some pretty serious confusion on here regarding the dynapack dynos. Here is a run that I did recently with my clutch slipping like it was covered in 5W-30!
Please note that it says Flywheel TQ and HP. Also notice that the correction factor is 1.00. The TCF stands for total correction factor. If 1.15 was entered, the dyno would tack on 15% to the wheel numbers. If they enter 0.85 for a TCF, the dyno will knock 15% off the wheel number. 1.00 is what the car is making at the wheels. No matter what, "flywheel" is is what the dynapack chart will read.
Please note that it says Flywheel TQ and HP. Also notice that the correction factor is 1.00. The TCF stands for total correction factor. If 1.15 was entered, the dyno would tack on 15% to the wheel numbers. If they enter 0.85 for a TCF, the dyno will knock 15% off the wheel number. 1.00 is what the car is making at the wheels. No matter what, "flywheel" is is what the dynapack chart will read.
09-23-2005, 05:34 PM
#471
Rennlist Member
The reason I made that comment was to give you some ribbing about your dyno sheet print out. You say it's has the SAE correction, yet Bills dyno sheet from a dynapack dyno (submitted on page 13 of this thread) has Hp SAE listed in the legend where your's does not.
You say your's is corrected, Rob says the dyno guy tells him it is rear wheel and NOT flywheel. If you are not going to accept Rob's sheet, you shouldn't accept you own most recent submission.
Just go back to the dyno and have them print you an SAE corrected graph. My local dyno stores all the runs they have made for furture reference.
You say your's is corrected, Rob says the dyno guy tells him it is rear wheel and NOT flywheel. If you are not going to accept Rob's sheet, you shouldn't accept you own most recent submission.
Just go back to the dyno and have them print you an SAE corrected graph. My local dyno stores all the runs they have made for furture reference.
09-23-2005, 05:41 PM
#472
Race Director
Thread Starter
I have got the corrected chart, I posted it. Notice Ted's chart does not have corrected next the the HP on the axis either? I guess we have learnt that not all charts on al dynos print out the same. Thanks for the ribbing, have fun out there! 
Anymore more issues, please direct them to my PM. I dont want my thread to get closed because of bickering. Thanks guys!
Anymore more issues, please direct them to my PM. I dont want my thread to get closed because of bickering. Thanks guys!
09-23-2005, 05:46 PM
#474
Race Director
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by NZ951
Anymore more issues, please direct them to my PM. I dont want my thread to get closed because of bickering. Thanks guys!
09-23-2005, 06:53 PM
#475
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZ951
Hey Ted, how did you calculate the diff ratio 3.810?
09-23-2005, 08:19 PM
#477
Race Director
Thread Starter
PS The changes I have made since my last run include a dump to ATM WG, which reduced exhaust pressure to under 1psi from 6psi, and I also ran another .5psi of boost Happy days!
Happy days!
09-23-2005, 10:20 PM
#478
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"PS The changes I have made since my last run include a dump to ATM WG, which reduced exhaust pressure to under 1psi from 6psi, and I also ran another .5psi of boost Happy days!"
I think you would agree this shows your 3 inch exhaust was to small.
Wes
I think you would agree this shows your 3 inch exhaust was to small.
Wes
09-26-2005, 02:16 AM
#480
Rennlist Member
So...if you correct my dyno on my dyno dynamics machine and convert it to dynojet....then....I'd be over 500 whp! Great! Put me up.....JUST KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!! I like my numbers just where they are knowing they are really higher. I'll wait for the proof with the rest of you guys. Gots to get back to the dyno...