Stop Sale on 718 GTS, Spyder & GT4
The following users liked this post:
*LongFella81 (03-31-2021)
#722
Just noticed as I was going through the data sheet that shows the VN affected by the suspension and con rod stop sale that only 1 Spyder is affected by the suspension stop sale. Crazy how only one Spyder and not a batch of Spyders got affected.
#723
Originally Posted by halfmonkey
Just noticed as I was going through the data sheet that shows the VN affected by the suspension and con rod stop sale that only 1 Spyder is affected by the suspension stop sale. Crazy how only one Spyder and not a batch of Spyders got affected.
#724
Sorry to hear that you're one of the con rod affected cars. Hopefully it's fixed sooner, rather than later for all of those affected.
#725
That's true but since the VIN number range is consecutive is there something on VINs that designate US cars and not the last digits?
I can't imagine they reserved all those consecutive numbers just for the US.
#726
The following users liked this post:
Mariomark (03-31-2021)
#728
Yes, I was aware of these. Still not sure how they determined that this failure mode is exclusive to this particular batch of con rods and that it is solely caused by their imperfect manufacture and not by a confluence of other factors (including bad design), as well. They could also be unsure about this but, of course, it wouldn't be in their interest to share. Yet another confirmation of the old adage to avoid buying the first iteration of any product lest you end up being a beta-tester on your own dime.
This is a supplier manufacturing error, plain and simple.
The following 3 users liked this post by UncleDude:
#730
+1
Spend any amount of time in a company that manufactures complex machines with thousands or even millions of parts (I work in aerospace) that rely on supply chain and you would see that supplier quality escapes are very common. Entire teams are dedicated to the job of managing escapes and analyzing their impact and assessing potential solutions and/or recalls. I know it was hard to wait a couple of weeks for an answer from Porsche but I am sure that during those weeks they were trying to come up with every solution possible to not do a recall or contain the issue to as small as impact as possible to both them and us (let alone making sure they fully understood the scope of the issue and impacted vehicles). Unfortunate in this case that it happened to be on a critical piece of the engine. Not the first, won't be the last.
Spend any amount of time in a company that manufactures complex machines with thousands or even millions of parts (I work in aerospace) that rely on supply chain and you would see that supplier quality escapes are very common. Entire teams are dedicated to the job of managing escapes and analyzing their impact and assessing potential solutions and/or recalls. I know it was hard to wait a couple of weeks for an answer from Porsche but I am sure that during those weeks they were trying to come up with every solution possible to not do a recall or contain the issue to as small as impact as possible to both them and us (let alone making sure they fully understood the scope of the issue and impacted vehicles). Unfortunate in this case that it happened to be on a critical piece of the engine. Not the first, won't be the last.
Last edited by Litt; 03-31-2021 at 11:22 AM.
The following users liked this post:
worf928 (03-31-2021)
#731
I drilled (in a nice way) my SA yesterday. The information his Service Manager (and Regional Service Manager for that matter) was giving him was flat out wrong. It put my SA in a bad spot to relay false information to a consumer and then find out the consumer knows more about what is going on then his own Service Manager and Regional Service Manager. That's a problem - a big problem IMO. it also shows most SA's are only focused on the sale at hand and not focusing on this major issue. Most SA will just pawn it off to their Service Manager to resolve and figure out.
Porsche - If you are reading this, PM me. Let's talk.
#732
You think Porsche, after all these years of designing motors, suddenly produced a flawed design of a con rod, one that is likely identical or near to designs they’ve been running in other motors for years? Any other ridiculous speculation you wanna throw in the mix to support your claim of sticking with your 1983 Boxster instead of buying a new one?
This is a supplier manufacturing error, plain and simple.
This is a supplier manufacturing error, plain and simple.
#733
#734
Two weeks and 700 posts later...
The following 4 users liked this post by 987SCoupe: