718 GT4RS
#7682
#7684
I have driven my Spyder back-to-back with a GT4 with iron brakes, the reduction of rotor mass lightens the steering feel, even though there is power steering you feel the crispness when making fast changes, additionally I can feel that the reduced weight allows the suspension to keep the tire in contact with the road surface, and it reacts less harshly to road imperfections. Subtle but noticeable when compared directly, I went even further by adding lighter forged wheels.
#7685
The following 2 users liked this post by jmartpr:
Porsche2014 (12-03-2022),
zbbb0730 (12-03-2022)
#7686
That's got to be some serious speed hump....on the 718 gt4 I never had a problem with the front, but the rear diffuser did scrape occasionally. The front splitter extends further on the 4RS but not by a huge amount. IMO it depends how you use the car and where you live. As you can guess no FAL for me, like to keep it simple.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
The following 2 users liked this post by Odin:
Booth9999 (12-08-2022),
very green R (12-03-2022)
#7687
From a resale perspective FAL is sensible even though you may not desperately need it where you drive, but if you go down into underground car parks, or onto ferries, FAL is absolutely necessary on the GT4RS. 5-6kgs is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
The following users liked this post:
zbbb0730 (12-03-2022)
#7688
From a resale perspective FAL is sensible even though you may not desperately need it where you drive, but if you go down into underground car parks, or onto ferries, FAL is absolutely necessary on the GT4RS. 5-6kgs is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
If we go down the weight savings hole then why spec Mag wheels or PCCB....its only a few Kg.
Again FAL works for some but after 2 GT4s I'm pretty sure I can live without.
The following users liked this post:
zbbb0730 (12-03-2022)
#7689
From a resale perspective FAL is sensible even though you may not desperately need it where you drive, but if you go down into underground car parks, or onto ferries, FAL is absolutely necessary on the GT4RS. 5-6kgs is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
If we go down the weight savings hole then why spec Mag wheels or PCCB....its only a few Kg.
Again FAL works for some but after 2 GT4s I'm pretty sure I can live without.
#7690
From a resale perspective FAL is sensible even though you may not desperately need it where you drive, but if you go down into underground car parks, or onto ferries, FAL is absolutely necessary on the GT4RS. 5-6kgs is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
#7691
That's a great point about building a car for the next owner. That's the main reason I'm looking at LWBS. For me, the sofas for sure. I have two race cars for the track. LWBS looks great, but I really need to sit in a car with them to know. My wife hated them in the last GT4 I had. I wasn't crazy about them either.
The following users liked this post:
zbbb0730 (12-03-2022)
#7693
From a resale perspective FAL is sensible even though you may not desperately need it where you drive, but if you go down into underground car parks, or onto ferries, FAL is absolutely necessary on the GT4RS. 5-6kgs is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
It also makes changing tyres and adjusting front aero easier.
The following users liked this post:
zbbb0730 (12-03-2022)
#7694
Well said. Same boat (but with just one previous GT4)
#7695
The following users liked this post:
Porsche2014 (12-04-2022)