Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT2RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2017, 03:07 PM
  #946  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Footsoldier
The 2RS will very likely stand up to a lot more hard use (eg track) than either of the other two, which is what it's made for. (Notwithstanding that any road car is a big compromise on a track)

675LTs chew through brakes for a start, and the 458 Speciale is also limited in the amount of hard use it can take, as is the 488. (2 hard laps and it's flagging with tyre heat etc) The GT3RS by contrast has all the years of GT dept. experience behind it, and the 2RS will be the same. (I'm getting a 488 in May and would be able to get a Speciale so no agenda - they are different types of car)

I know quite a lot of people who track cars such as these, and after being blown away by the performance of say a 675LT initially, the suitability of the 3RS to consistent (relativity...) inexpensive heavy use has come into its own over time.
While I definitely agree the 675 eats brakes (well all Mclarens ex P1 do), surely it's also a function of the fact it's a car with a ton of hp and relatively high weight.

The 991rs has been relatively easy on brakes because it's almost 200hp behind. the 2rs with 650-700hp will be a much better comparison of how the SGL coated rotors hold up compared to the brembo rotor as used on the Mclaren/Ferrrari. While I think the SGL rotor will last longer, it's also a heck of a lot more expensive so it'd better hold up much better too...
Old 03-29-2017, 03:11 PM
  #947  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,025
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
While I definitely agree the 675 eats brakes (well all Mclarens ex P1 do), surely it's also a function of the fact it's a car with a ton of hp and relatively high weight.

The 991rs has been relatively easy on brakes because it's almost 200hp behind. the 2rs with 650-700hp will be a much better comparison of how the SGL coated rotors hold up compared to the brembo rotor as used on the Mclaren/Ferrrari. While I think the SGL rotor will last longer, it's also a heck of a lot more expensive so it'd better hold up much better too...
Agree that brake use on the the GT2RS vs the 675LT/720S is a more fair comparison than GT3RS VS those same macs as the power and speeds will be fairly close of the GT2RS and the 675/720

However I disagree with the your comment above of high weight. The Mclarens due to their carbon tubs are by far the lightest cars we're talking about on this thread, so if they're still eating brakes compared to the GT2RS, then Mclaren has no excuse.
Old 03-29-2017, 03:22 PM
  #948  
Apolo1
Pro
 
Apolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 592
Received 298 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Agree that brake use on the the GT2RS vs the 675LT/720S is a more fair comparison than GT3RS VS those same macs as the power and speeds will be fairly close of the GT2RS and the 675/720

However I disagree with the your comment above of high weight. The Mclarens due to their carbon tubs are by far the lightest cars we're talking about on this thread, so if they're still eating brakes compared to the GT2RS, then Mclaren has no excuse.
I actually prefer the peddle feel and modulation of the Lt brakes to that over the ones on the 91RS.

Problem with the LTs ones though is that they have no ceramic coating on them. As such it does not take to long for the bonding agent to become weak and brake down, this causes the CF to fracture, then the Pad becomes course. Having said this they do perform in line with the maker guidance for track miles usage....

My friends that track LTs a lot UK refer to them as " Chocolate Discs"....lol
Old 03-29-2017, 03:27 PM
  #949  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by signes
Gofundtrakcar.com. I'm in.
LOL

Originally Posted by ChrisF
Trak Car Porsche. Totally in. Will alternate buys between Peter and CJ
I'm late to the GT2RS thread with the GT3RS spyshots and all...

Originally Posted by Nizer
Need to get Mooty in as well. He can sell bicycles and stuffed animals out the back of the dealership.
Market cornered wouldn't pass FTC approval.

Originally Posted by porscheflat6
Old 03-29-2017, 03:27 PM
  #950  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Agree that brake use on the the GT2RS vs the 675LT/720S is a more fair comparison than GT3RS VS those same macs as the power and speeds will be fairly close of the GT2RS and the 675/720

However I disagree with the your comment above of high weight. The Mclarens due to their carbon tubs are by far the lightest cars we're talking about on this thread, so if they're still eating brakes compared to the GT2RS, then Mclaren has no excuse.
Fair enough, I meant it's still a ~1400kg car (without driver) and that's not what I'd call a light car by any means. It's 100kg or so lighter than a 991 rs but it just means the RS is heavy!
Old 03-29-2017, 03:30 PM
  #951  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Apolo1
I actually prefer the peddle feel and modulation of the Lt brakes to that over the ones on the 91RS.

Problem with the LTs ones though is that they have no ceramic coating on them. As such it does not take to long for the bonding agent to become weak and brake down, this causes the CF to fracture, then the Pad becomes course. Having said this they do perform in line with the maker guidance for track miles usage....

My friends that track LTs a lot UK refer to them as " Chocolate Discs"....lol
Any production cars already selling with the "solid" rotors like Movit?
Old 03-29-2017, 03:32 PM
  #952  
Apolo1
Pro
 
Apolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 592
Received 298 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Agree that brake use on the the GT2RS vs the 675LT/720S is a more fair comparison than GT3RS VS those same macs as the power and speeds will be fairly close of the GT2RS and the 675/720

However I disagree with the your comment above of high weight. The Mclarens due to their carbon tubs are by far the lightest cars we're talking about on this thread, so if they're still eating brakes compared to the GT2RS, then Mclaren has no excuse.
Think I am right in saying that the CCBDs on the 997GT2RS and 997,4.0RS held the world recorded for braking performance. That stood until the 918 came out.
Old 03-29-2017, 03:40 PM
  #953  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Any production cars already selling with the "solid" rotors like Movit?
The P1 I believe. The akebono rotors seem to be continuous cf fibre rotors like surface transforms who make the movit rotors. The akebono P1 pads are staggeringly expensive though afaik.

Koenigsegg are using ST rotors as well I think. And probably the Aston Red Bull car will as ST are supposed to be involved with that.
Old 03-29-2017, 05:42 PM
  #954  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,025
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
Fair enough, I meant it's still a ~1400kg car (without driver) and that's not what I'd call a light car by any means. It's 100kg or so lighter than a 991 rs but it just means the RS is heavy!
I'm not sure if you're older and so just thinking about cars from the 60s or something with no airbags or side impact protection, etc ??? The definition of a light sports car has changed with modern mandated safety equipment.

The 720S is 2829 pounds, and the 675LT a few pounds lighter, and both are two of the lightest sports cars in this century. The only street legal "sports cars" that are lighter than the Mclarens are little roadsters with tiny engines (less than 200hp) like the miata.

So if considering actual sports cars in this century, most of which weigh around 3500lbs or more, the Mclaren 675LT and 720S at just over 2800lbs are both very light.

Last edited by Drifting; 03-29-2017 at 06:00 PM.
Old 03-29-2017, 06:50 PM
  #955  
isv
Pro
 
isv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
I'm not sure if you're older and so just thinking about cars from the 60s or something with no airbags or side impact protection, etc ??? The definition of a light sports car has changed with modern mandated safety equipment.

The 720S is 2829 pounds, and the 675LT a few pounds lighter, and both are two of the lightest sports cars in this century. The only street legal "sports cars" that are lighter than the Mclarens are little roadsters with tiny engines (less than 200hp) like the miata.

So if considering actual sports cars in this century, most of which weigh around 3500lbs or more, the Mclaren 675LT and 720S at just over 2800lbs are both very light.
The 675 with fuel will be ~1390-1400kg fully fuelled in delivered customer spec. (2829lbs ie 1283kg for the 720 is for a dry weight). As I said, 100kg lighter than a 991RS or Speciale but not really 'light' imo.

I'd consider a exige v6 cup as a light car (1150kg with fuel) and yes I do realise there are very few cars that will fit my definition of a light sports car rather unfortunately....
Old 03-29-2017, 07:31 PM
  #956  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,025
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isv
The 675 with fuel will be ~1390-1400kg fully fuelled in delivered customer spec. (2829lbs ie 1283kg for the 720 is for a dry weight). As I said, 100kg lighter than a 991RS or Speciale but not really 'light' imo.

I'd consider a exige v6 cup as a light car (1150kg with fuel) and yes I do realise there are very few cars that will fit my definition of a light sports car rather unfortunately....
true the 2829 is a dry weight for the 720S, and you make a good point with the Lotus, as in many ways Lotus is the only true lightweight street legal sports car out there. However, Lotus cars are also rather underpowered. I don't really consider a car to be a sports car if it doesn't have at least 350hp.

I guess my concern is that you called the Mclaren "heavy" in a thread on the GT2RS, while we're comparing the GT2RS to the 488 and 720S, so by definition we are talking about cars with >650 horsepower. Engines that produce that much horsepower are always much heavier than the tiny engines in a Lotus. It's apples and oranges.

Not really fair to compare a 720S to a Lotus and then call the Mclaren heavy, when most Lotus cars have less than half the horsepower of the 720S. If you can put an engine producing over 650hp in a Lotus and still have a Lotus weighing less than 3000lbs, then you can start calling the Mclarens heavy.
Old 03-30-2017, 12:43 PM
  #957  
TopspeedPT
Racer
 
TopspeedPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
Received 121 Likes on 64 Posts
Default





Old 03-30-2017, 01:09 PM
  #958  
MsGT3
Instructor
 
MsGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 100
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Is there a reason why GT2's don't get .2 versions but GT3's do?
Old 03-30-2017, 01:19 PM
  #959  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,520
Received 1,730 Likes on 916 Posts
Default

Dig those rear facing cannons. Good for seeing off pesky Maccas and Fiats.

Now we know what the intake vents on the MKII 3RS look like. Question remains purpose...

Is just me or do the side sills looker deeper?
Old 03-30-2017, 02:04 PM
  #960  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,188
Received 1,150 Likes on 568 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Dig those rear facing cannons. Good for seeing off pesky Maccas and Fiats.
Looks very aggressive. They should shoot fire on overrun!


Quick Reply: 991 GT2RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:40 PM.