GT350
#1186
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guys the R is better no doubt, but don't think it's the kind of difference the 991 GT3 RS brings to the table over the GT3.
This is more like the 07 GT3 RS / GT3 differences. Same engine, same HP, same widebody chassis (GT350/R).
The R has more aero, suspension damping, wheels and tires along with no backseats and resonators removed for a slightly louder sound.
This is more like the 07 GT3 RS / GT3 differences. Same engine, same HP, same widebody chassis (GT350/R).
The R has more aero, suspension damping, wheels and tires along with no backseats and resonators removed for a slightly louder sound.
#1187
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't pretend to know what differences Ford has programmed into the logic of the adaptive suspension systems of both cars, but a 3 second difference on a 2 minute track could easily be accounted for by tires alone. On a roughly 2-minute track, my own GT3 is at least 3 seconds faster on good r-comps (BFG R1) vs very good street tires (Yokohama AD08), and I've seen that level of difference in several other cars when switching from good streets to good r-comps.
If the GT350R has significantly more aero downforce than the non R, I'm surprised the lap time differences would be so small, given tire differences and suspension tweaks.
If the GT350R has significantly more aero downforce than the non R, I'm surprised the lap time differences would be so small, given tire differences and suspension tweaks.
#1188
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The R has the same drive train as a tech pack car and track pack.
The main and major difference in performance deltas are the R's tires in both compound and size. Period. The rest makes for minor differences.
The real difference will still be driver input in any of these cars.
If u can't drive a slow car fast you can't drive a fast car fast regardless of it's specs.
The main and major difference in performance deltas are the R's tires in both compound and size. Period. The rest makes for minor differences.
The real difference will still be driver input in any of these cars.
If u can't drive a slow car fast you can't drive a fast car fast regardless of it's specs.
#1190
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't pre
tend to know what differences Ford has programmed into the logic of the adaptive suspension systems of both cars, but a 3 second difference on a 2 minute track could easily be accounted for by tires alone. On a roughly 2-minute track, my own GT3 is at least 3 seconds faster on good r-comps (BFG R1) vs very good street tires (Yokohama AD08), and I've seen that level of difference in several other cars when switching from good streets to good r-comps.
If the GT350R has significantly more aero downforce than the non R, I'm surprised the lap time differences would be so small, given tire differences and suspension tweaks.
tend to know what differences Ford has programmed into the logic of the adaptive suspension systems of both cars, but a 3 second difference on a 2 minute track could easily be accounted for by tires alone. On a roughly 2-minute track, my own GT3 is at least 3 seconds faster on good r-comps (BFG R1) vs very good street tires (Yokohama AD08), and I've seen that level of difference in several other cars when switching from good streets to good r-comps.
If the GT350R has significantly more aero downforce than the non R, I'm surprised the lap time differences would be so small, given tire differences and suspension tweaks.
Its simple. Put 305 x 315 cups on a Boss and see what happens.
Are there any numbers on the Rs aero vs. The Track Pack car.?
If you only want an R because it's "the one" to have as far as collectibility u have to decide if the premiums the stealerships are getting still make it worth it. If you are after fast lap times tires and wheels and aero are easy to change on a track pack car. You likely can get the Rs calibrated dampers from FRPP and still be WAY under the ADM you otherwise would have paid. Other upgraded suspension options are likey available if you are that good and need it or just want it.
Oh, Pads are easy too and make a huge difference.
Last edited by Waxer; 06-14-2016 at 09:21 AM.
#1191
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Take away the R's 305 x 315 cups and you substantially declawed it. Anyone thinking otherwise is heavy on the Kool Aide. Switch wheels and tires with a stock LS and R and watch the LS cut faster lap times than the R.
Its simple. Put 305 x 315 cups on a Boss and see what happens.
Are there any numbers on the Rs aero vs. The Track Pack car.?
If you only want an R because it's "the one" to have as far as collectibility u have to decide if the premiums the stealerships are getting still make it worth it. If you are after fast lap times tires and wheels and aero are easy to change on a track pack car. You likely can get the Rs calibrated dampers from FRPP and still be WAY under the ADM you otherwise would have paid. Other upgraded suspension options are likey available if you are that good and need it or just want it.
Oh, Pads are easy too and make a huge difference.
Its simple. Put 305 x 315 cups on a Boss and see what happens.
Are there any numbers on the Rs aero vs. The Track Pack car.?
If you only want an R because it's "the one" to have as far as collectibility u have to decide if the premiums the stealerships are getting still make it worth it. If you are after fast lap times tires and wheels and aero are easy to change on a track pack car. You likely can get the Rs calibrated dampers from FRPP and still be WAY under the ADM you otherwise would have paid. Other upgraded suspension options are likey available if you are that good and need it or just want it.
Oh, Pads are easy too and make a huge difference.
I agree. I am making due with what I have because it does not make financial sense to pay a premium ADM for just a few seconds and collectible value - I would drive the crap out of it on the track and it's value may plummet anyway.
#1192
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Try taking the wing off your GT3 and see how it performs. Having backed to back the TP & R, the aero stability and grip is noticeably better in the R (and thats not just tire).
#1193
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's why I'm surprised there would only be a 3 sec lap time difference between GT350R and non-R on a 2-min track. Wider MPSC2's should be able to net 3 sec (or close to it) over narrower MPSS, all else being equal. When you add big aero on top of the tire advantage, I would have expected to see a bigger delta. Do you know how much downforce the R makes relative to the non-R?
#1195
Burning Brakes
#1197
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Darn near same specs as mine except I went with the tech package just in case I wanted to sell it down the road (i usually only keep cars 1-2 years)..
Question for everyone, do you guys think a radio delete car will be hard to sell to the general public? I'm very torn because I want to go radio delete, just don't want to handcuff myself for resale later on...
Thanks
#1198
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Darn near same specs as mine except I went with the tech package just in case I wanted to sell it down the road (i usually only keep cars 1-2 years).. Question for everyone, do you guys think a radio delete car will be hard to sell to the general public? I'm very torn because I want to go radio delete, just don't want to handcuff myself for resale later on... Thanks
#1199