Notices

GT350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2016, 06:20 PM
  #1531  
Para82
Race Car
 
Para82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bogota / Navarre Beach
Posts: 4,191
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Anyone watch IMSA yesterday? GT350 took it's 3rd win in a row!
Old 08-07-2016, 08:43 PM
  #1532  
stuntman
Instructor
 
stuntman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 243
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Back to back track times at the limit. No I haven't. Just driving them back to back doesn't cut it either.

So your saying the R can hit the mid 20s at the ring? We know kluck did a 7:25 in the GT 3. The Z28 never hit the 20s. So the R is that much faster at the Ring and it's all kept hush hush? Oey. Stop.
Nope; since the laptime of the GT350/R has never been published. I'm just going off personal experience on tracks with a more normal ~1.5-2 minute lap.

Kluck's a great driver. Do you have a link to his in-car, sportauto, or whoever had him do it? (anything other than the erroneous Fastestlaps.com)?

Originally Posted by Para82
Anyone watch IMSA yesterday? GT350 took it's 3rd win in a row!
I heard there was a lot of passing and actual 'racing'. Probably the best race of the year.
Old 08-07-2016, 09:05 PM
  #1533  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

I don't know if Kluck had in car vid. Point is there is no reason not to accept or believe his recorded time.

I would believe that if an R had cracked below 7:30 we would have heard all about it. It can't so we won't. Simple as that.

The GT350 RC is doing well in class which is GS against Caymens and 997s. It is not running against 991Rs or RSRs in the faster classes.
Old 08-07-2016, 09:13 PM
  #1534  
stuntman
Instructor
 
stuntman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 243
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
I don't know if Kluck had in car vid. Point is there is no reason not to accept or believe his recorded time.

I would believe that if an R had cracked below 7:30 we would have heard all about it. It can't so we won't. Simple as that.

The GT350 RC is doing well in class which is GS against Caymens and 997s. It is not running against 991Rs or RSRs in the faster classes.
-If your only source is Fastestlaps.com then maybe Kluk's 7:25 is as fabricated as the HP King's 350R laptime

-The GT350 never ran around Nurburgring with an R wing on it, so a "GT350R" never ran around Nurburgring.

-Ford never stated an official lap time, and they never have with all of the cars they've developed there (GT500, Focus RS, etc..)

-There are no more 997's in GS.
Old 08-07-2016, 09:21 PM
  #1535  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,824
Received 2,356 Likes on 628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Empherical data please. On longer circuits no. It's 7 seconds behind the GT3 at the Ring. On shorter technical circuits I seriously doubt it. M3 GTS is faster and the GT3 is faster than the M. Case in point. Pobst did a 1:57 in the R at Chuckwalla. Patrick Long did a 1:57 at Chuckwalla in a vintage '69 911ST 2.5. Now imagine if he was working with a 991 GT3. Nuff said.
I did a 1:53 in my viper at chuckwalla the 2nd time I was there. How's that for data? Lol.
Old 08-07-2016, 09:40 PM
  #1536  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,824
Received 2,356 Likes on 628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Para82
Anyone watch IMSA yesterday? GT350 took it's 3rd win in a row!
It was a great race til we ran out of gas...

You guys don't seem to understand how good the 350R really is. I have one and it's very good. Big *** tires and a ton of torque.

It has a lot more aero than you would think- mostly because of the chin spoiler. When you effectively block air from the underside of the car, the pressure difference really evacuates the underside of the car and sucks it to the ground.

Why is the 350R so good?

Torque.
Aero.
Tires.

Also- because of the wide track and lack of overhangs on the car it really handles well. You guys are focused a lot on weight (which is fine) but because of how the car is sprung (it has active dampers also) and how good the steering is (active steering mode selection- sport), the sum of the parts is a great package.

I'll be taking mine on track this fall once I get it all broken in and know for a fact that stock vs stock the difference between the 350R and a stock porsche will be more decided by driver vs driver than a lot of other cars.

In the same way that a GT4 is easier for novices to push at 8/10ths, and a GT3RS is a better car at 10/10ths than the GT3, the GT350R is a lot more car with very progressive handling at the limit than a lot of other cars and is easy to drive fast. It's balanced really well and like the ACR is just softly sprung enough that you really put down power from the rear axle without sliding around everywhere (like a 458).
Old 08-07-2016, 10:28 PM
  #1537  
stuntman
Instructor
 
stuntman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 243
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

^well said. However I think the imsa spec Cayman GT4 has more downforce than the 350R-C since they are allowed to have underbody aero and gurney flaps.
Old 08-07-2016, 11:01 PM
  #1538  
Para82
Race Car
 
Para82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bogota / Navarre Beach
Posts: 4,191
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuntman
I heard there was a lot of passing and actual 'racing'. Probably the best race of the year.
I've got the day off tomorrow so i'll have to catch up on youtube with this race and the LimeRock victory last week - with full surround sound of course
Old 08-08-2016, 12:29 AM
  #1539  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,824
Received 2,356 Likes on 628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuntman
^well said. However I think the imsa spec Cayman GT4 has more downforce than the 350R-C since they are allowed to have underbody aero and gurney flaps.
No we are just allowed to run the stock setup which is 1.5" higher ride height than factory delivered to us. Which makes the car really floaty but super fun
Old 08-08-2016, 01:01 AM
  #1540  
avh128996tt
Track Day
 
avh128996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 08-08-2016, 07:00 AM
  #1541  
stuntman
Instructor
 
stuntman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 243
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
No we are just allowed to run the stock setup which is 1.5" higher ride height than factory delivered to us. Which makes the car really floaty but super fun
Is the chassis 1.5" higher, or is the suspension geometry 1.5" higher due to the smaller spec wheels?

The non-stock Gurney Flap should help make up for that. The GT350RC was required to remove it's factory under aero and also runs smaller brakes than stock (rotor size and piston count).
Old 08-08-2016, 09:51 AM
  #1542  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
It was a great race til we ran out of gas...

You guys don't seem to understand how good the 350R really is. I have one and it's very good. Big *** tires and a ton of torque.

It has a lot more aero than you would think- mostly because of the chin spoiler. When you effectively block air from the underside of the car, the pressure difference really evacuates the underside of the car and sucks it to the ground.

Why is the 350R so good?

Torque.
Aero.
Tires.

Also- because of the wide track and lack of overhangs on the car it really handles well. You guys are focused a lot on weight (which is fine) but because of how the car is sprung (it has active dampers also) and how good the steering is (active steering mode selection- sport), the sum of the parts is a great package.

I'll be taking mine on track this fall once I get it all broken in and know for a fact that stock vs stock the difference between the 350R and a stock porsche will be more decided by driver vs driver than a lot of other cars.

In the same way that a GT4 is easier for novices to push at 8/10ths, and a GT3RS is a better car at 10/10ths than the GT3, the GT350R is a lot more car with very progressive handling at the limit than a lot of other cars and is easy to drive fast. It's balanced really well and like the ACR is just softly sprung enough that you really put down power from the rear axle without sliding around everywhere (like a 458).
Sounds like the R is a match for that '69 911 ST Long was wheeling around Chuckwalla after all!

The R is a great package. Never said it wasn't. Same drive train as the TP though. Tires are the MAIN difference. Take those huge sport cup 2s away and your not much different than a tp gt350.

I would have liked to see a power difference between the R and the tp.
Old 08-08-2016, 10:07 AM
  #1543  
redleg321
Racer
 
redleg321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PcarFL
I am going to get a GT350. Would you recommend finding a deal on a new 16 or play the over MSRP game on a 17. Best I was able to find in my tri county dealer on a 17 was $5k over. I am new at the gt350 search. Any help or advice would be appreciated. Thx
If you get a '16 just make sure its not a tech pack. There's well-documented issues with tech packs so go track pack for 2016. 2017's get track bits standard so you just decide whether you want electronics or convenience.

If you get an R none of this matters. They're all bulletproof.
Old 08-08-2016, 11:17 AM
  #1544  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,824
Received 2,356 Likes on 628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuntman
Is the chassis 1.5" higher, or is the suspension geometry 1.5" higher due to the smaller spec wheels? The non-stock Gurney Flap should help make up for that. The GT350RC was required to remove it's factory under aero and also runs smaller brakes than stock (rotor size and piston count).
Our PFC brakes are pretty good on the porsche but I think all the cars are designed for bigger rotors and 19"- 20" wheels to clear them. Running 18" means for all the cars in the series (except the Aston which looks slammed) that there is too much air in the wheel wells due to the minimum ride height and smaller rolling diameter.

But hey without rules it would be too insane so we just have to adjust right?
Old 08-08-2016, 02:48 PM
  #1545  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

IMSA cite has the GT350 RC running in GS with 997 and Caymen.


Quick Reply: GT350



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:07 PM.