Originally Posted by pszikla

Here's mine. 1999C2 3.4L rebuilt as 3.8L.
The dyno chart title says 4.0 but it really is 3.8L
The before in this case was done after the build to 3.8L and the after is with the dyno tune which better matched the various changes to work together.

Originally Posted by zbomb

I think that engine output, including peak power IS important.

If we're going to talk about power bands, flat torque curves and BIG peak numbers, dyno graphs should form the basis of those conversations. Why wouldn't they ? What else should ?

So, let's see those higher than stock HP 996's. Share the mods you've done or not. Share how much you spent to get there, or not. There's a lot to be learned by the sharing and discussion of dyno graphs - I hope some people have seen that first hand on other forums and will help encourage, and participate in bringing some of that community knowledge gathering here.

RULES (we're not savages)

1. No Mezgers, any and all other engines allowed and encouraged, any displacement, power adder or combination of power adders also good to go.
2. Must post a chassis dyno graph, if the dyno MFG isn't overlaid on the graph, please add to your post.
3. If you're a MFG, No Development Mules, must be an engine, or parts combo that you sell or is otherwise commercially available. AND, cost of parts, or engine should be included in your post or readily available through your, or others web store.

Originally Posted by TexSquirrel

@zbomb, it would be nice if the engines were marked in your list above to show whether they were M96, LS swaps, or K-swaps, or...

Originally Posted by Justin76

all I have is FVD headers, FVD catless x pipe, FVD tune, and Fabspeed Maxflo exhaust also

Originally Posted by Falcon911

@Justin76 Impressive numbers for a bolt-on 3.6. Is this SAE correction and pump fuel?