996 Horsepower (No Mezgers Allowed)
#1
Race Car
Thread Starter
996 Horsepower (No Mezgers Allowed)
I think that engine output, including peak power IS important.
If we're going to talk about power bands, flat torque curves and BIG peak numbers, dyno graphs should form the basis of those conversations. Why wouldn't they ? What else should ?
So, let's see those higher than stock HP 996's. Share the mods you've done or not. Share how much you spent to get there, or not. There's a lot to be learned by the sharing and discussion of dyno graphs - I hope some people have seen that first hand on other forums and will help encourage, and participate in bringing some of that community knowledge gathering here.
RULES (we're not savages)
1. No Mezgers, any and all other engines allowed and encouraged, any displacement, power adder or combination of power adders also good to go.
2. Must post a chassis dyno graph, if the dyno MFG isn't overlaid on the graph, please add to your post.
3. If you're a MFG, No Development Mules, must be an engine, or parts combo that you sell or is otherwise commercially available. AND, cost of parts, or engine should be included in your post or readily available through your, or others web store.
If we're going to talk about power bands, flat torque curves and BIG peak numbers, dyno graphs should form the basis of those conversations. Why wouldn't they ? What else should ?
So, let's see those higher than stock HP 996's. Share the mods you've done or not. Share how much you spent to get there, or not. There's a lot to be learned by the sharing and discussion of dyno graphs - I hope some people have seen that first hand on other forums and will help encourage, and participate in bringing some of that community knowledge gathering here.
RULES (we're not savages)
1. No Mezgers, any and all other engines allowed and encouraged, any displacement, power adder or combination of power adders also good to go.
2. Must post a chassis dyno graph, if the dyno MFG isn't overlaid on the graph, please add to your post.
3. If you're a MFG, No Development Mules, must be an engine, or parts combo that you sell or is otherwise commercially available. AND, cost of parts, or engine should be included in your post or readily available through your, or others web store.
Last edited by zbomb; 08-25-2022 at 08:39 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by zbomb:
#2
Nordschleife Master
I be sad
J/k i like math so send the graphs.
J/k i like math so send the graphs.
#3
Rennlist Member
Might also want to know if Standard or SAE, I would only accept SAE.
#4
Race Car
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
JohnCA58 (08-23-2022)
#5
Burning Brakes
2004 911 C2 3.6L
Peak HP 310 and torque 282
Engine Mods
BMC Air Filter
Muffler delete
Speedtech Headers
Speedtech Catless X Pipe
Softronic Tune
FVD deep sump
Motorsport AOS
AC Delete
Tarett Underdrive Pulley
LN IMS Solution
Fairly fresh plugs, coils and injectors
Last edited by JSETarga; 08-24-2022 at 01:00 AM.
The following 9 users liked this post by JSETarga:
2mAn (04-02-2023),
C2-996 (12-01-2022),
Dr_Strangelove (08-24-2022),
JohnCA58 (08-24-2022),
NYoutftr (08-24-2022),
and 4 others liked this post.
#6
Rennlist Member
It will be interesting to see another dyno with a muffler system and see if there is a increase in torque at 2700 rpm.
#7
Race Car
Thread Starter
From 3600- 5500 to have nice torque and the peak power seems strong. Would be hard pressed to say his mods aren't working. Looks like the power just starts dipping before shutting it down, I wonder what it would look like if he ran it out another 500RPM.
Thanks for posting dude.
Trending Topics
#8
Drifting
I like this idea. I think it would also be cool to see what HP output looks like on a stock or fairly stock motor after about 20 years of use. In other words, how is the M96 coping with power over time and how close is it to original power. In case anyone did a before and after dyno when adding any mods....
#9
Rennlist Member
2.7K pretty low in the RPM range, not an RPM I think there should be a big concern over power, at least, not a place I would put any priority on power at the sacrifice of anywhere else. Agree though, he's got a lot of the mods people generally say are not great for torque, in his case, looks good to me through.
From 3600- 5500 to have nice torque and the peak power seems strong. Would be hard pressed to say his mods aren't working. Looks like the power just starts dipping before shutting it down, I wonder what it would look like if he ran it out another 500RPM.
Thanks for posting dude.
From 3600- 5500 to have nice torque and the peak power seems strong. Would be hard pressed to say his mods aren't working. Looks like the power just starts dipping before shutting it down, I wonder what it would look like if he ran it out another 500RPM.
Thanks for posting dude.
I did try baffles before removing the bypass and was a little improvement,
Last edited by JohnCA58; 08-24-2022 at 11:51 AM.
#10
Burning Brakes
Just want to say there is 0 chance I would have the exhaust this way if I were driving on the street. It hurts your ears without a helmet on and draws way too much attention. It is LOUD!
The following 2 users liked this post by JSETarga:
damage98MO (08-24-2022),
JohnCA58 (08-24-2022)
The following users liked this post:
EVOMMM (08-24-2022)
#12
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I think that having Mezger's would be great too.
Always nice to see how an M96.2 3.8 or M96.3 4.x build stacks up against Porsche's "best", the M96.79 and the M96.70.
Always nice to see how an M96.2 3.8 or M96.3 4.x build stacks up against Porsche's "best", the M96.79 and the M96.70.
#13
Race Car
Thread Starter
The impetus for the thread was what people are getting for results, tuning, rebuilding or swapping their non turbo/GT 996.
That being the case, if you swapped a mezger into your non turbo/GT car, it is inline with the spirit of the thread so post away.
That being the case, if you swapped a mezger into your non turbo/GT car, it is inline with the spirit of the thread so post away.
The following users liked this post:
JohnCA58 (08-24-2022)