996 Horsepower (No Mezgers Allowed)
#361
Rennlist Member
This is from the 997 forum but I think it's worth mentioning here. Not much difference between an M96 and M97. Engine dyno pulls for a Slakker/Hartech 4.1L. The torque curve might look odd because of the type of dyno and how the engine is run up; it sits at 2K RPMs at full throttle until they are ready to let it rip. I suspect that lets the torque curve look flatter at lower RPMs than it might otherwise. Happy to hear from experts on that, I'm certainly not one of them!
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...e-testing.html
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...e-testing.html
The following 4 users liked this post by wdb:
#362
Race Car
Thread Starter
The engine dyno, or a variable load chassis dyno has a lot of benefits over an inertia type rolling road for development and calibration. Being able to hold the engine RPM steady at variable loads or vary the rate with which the engine speed increases allows a lot of granularity you can't get when the engine is just spinning up a drum of a known weight.
That all said, doesn't tell me a lot about what the output will look like at the wheels which, since I am not developing or calibrating anything, is all I really care about..
The conversation is pretty interesting though and for those that don't click the link you posted (I suggest you do), here's my response, I'll definitely be following along that thread.
I find it very interesting that even with the high octane the ECU is pulling timing. It would seem kind of amazing to me the engine at the type of normal octane limited compression ratios and cylinder pressures I would assume this engine is running is actually getting into any knock activity worthy of timing degradation unless the timing upper target is something bordering on unreasonable. I guess I need to do some research on combustion analyzers to conceptualize the 1 Bar/1K RPM you reference.
I wonder if the knock sensing strategy is an area worth seeking improvement.
That all said, doesn't tell me a lot about what the output will look like at the wheels which, since I am not developing or calibrating anything, is all I really care about..
The conversation is pretty interesting though and for those that don't click the link you posted (I suggest you do), here's my response, I'll definitely be following along that thread.
I find it very interesting that even with the high octane the ECU is pulling timing. It would seem kind of amazing to me the engine at the type of normal octane limited compression ratios and cylinder pressures I would assume this engine is running is actually getting into any knock activity worthy of timing degradation unless the timing upper target is something bordering on unreasonable. I guess I need to do some research on combustion analyzers to conceptualize the 1 Bar/1K RPM you reference.
I wonder if the knock sensing strategy is an area worth seeking improvement.
Last edited by zbomb; 04-23-2024 at 09:47 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by zbomb:
#363
Nordschleife Master
They were probably using semi-solid engine mounts, thus causing the knock sensors to kick in.
The following 5 users liked this post by De Jeeper:
allcool (04-23-2024),
Formerly996fried (04-24-2024),
M422A1 (04-24-2024),
Ratchet1025 (04-23-2024),
wdb (04-23-2024)
#364
Race Car
Thread Starter
Here’s some good context on knock control strategy using an aftermarket ECU.
The following users liked this post:
allcool (04-24-2024)
#365
Racer
Inherent harmonic imbalance of the m96 engine needs soft compliant mounts to help quell its built in harmonic vibrations. Thats probably part of the reason for DMF and extra soft engine tranny mounts.
And some m96 engine builders recommend and use an added harmonic type front pulley to help quell damaging m96 vibration.
Thats probably why we hear so many stories of changing engine/tranny mounts to anything but oem and now new harshness/vibrations are present. Wouldn't be surprised if those create a timing/HP pull also....
Seems High performance m96 engine mounts = lower m96 engine performance
jmo
And some m96 engine builders recommend and use an added harmonic type front pulley to help quell damaging m96 vibration.
Thats probably why we hear so many stories of changing engine/tranny mounts to anything but oem and now new harshness/vibrations are present. Wouldn't be surprised if those create a timing/HP pull also....
Seems High performance m96 engine mounts = lower m96 engine performance
jmo
Last edited by allcool; 04-24-2024 at 01:57 PM.
#366
Rennlist Member
Adding my 4.0 C4S numbers in.
Peak 305.52 horsepower and 296.98 wheel torque. If someone knows what the typical drivetrain loss is, please let me know. I figure somewhere between 10-20%.
More concerned with AFR and drivability around town so didn't go hard core on the tune.
I am really pleased with how the car drives now. Power delivery is so much smoother than it was before the tune. Engine had been running lean, hence the early shutdown. So yeah, I'm glad I got it sorted. Peace of mind for sure
We discussed headers to get a bit more power out of it but doubt I'll do anything else outside of enjoy it. I just know power and torque went up.....and it won't blow up!
First aborted run showing AFR. Just seeing this made me glad I was getting it tuned properly!
Peak 305.52 horsepower and 296.98 wheel torque. If someone knows what the typical drivetrain loss is, please let me know. I figure somewhere between 10-20%.
More concerned with AFR and drivability around town so didn't go hard core on the tune.
I am really pleased with how the car drives now. Power delivery is so much smoother than it was before the tune. Engine had been running lean, hence the early shutdown. So yeah, I'm glad I got it sorted. Peace of mind for sure
We discussed headers to get a bit more power out of it but doubt I'll do anything else outside of enjoy it. I just know power and torque went up.....and it won't blow up!
First aborted run showing AFR. Just seeing this made me glad I was getting it tuned properly!
Last edited by e30rapidic; Yesterday at 05:59 PM.
#367
Race Car
Thread Starter
Adding my 4.0 C4S numbers in.
Peak 305.52 horsepower and 296.98 wheel torque. If someone knows what the typical drivetrain loss is, please let me know. I figure somewhere between 10-20%.
More concerned with AFR and drivability around town so didn't go hard core on the tune.
I am really pleased with how the car drives now. Power delivery is so much smoother than it was before the tune. Engine had been running lean, hence the early shutdown. So yeah, I'm glad I got it sorted. Peace of mind for sure
https://youtube.com/shorts/F7weyr4Su...r8nbT1DLEketME
We discussed headers to get a bit more power out of it but doubt I'll do anything else outside of enjoy it. I just know power and torque went up.....and it won't blow up!
First aborted run showing AFR. Just seeing this made me glad I was getting it tuned properly!
Peak 305.52 horsepower and 296.98 wheel torque. If someone knows what the typical drivetrain loss is, please let me know. I figure somewhere between 10-20%.
More concerned with AFR and drivability around town so didn't go hard core on the tune.
I am really pleased with how the car drives now. Power delivery is so much smoother than it was before the tune. Engine had been running lean, hence the early shutdown. So yeah, I'm glad I got it sorted. Peace of mind for sure
https://youtube.com/shorts/F7weyr4Su...r8nbT1DLEketME
We discussed headers to get a bit more power out of it but doubt I'll do anything else outside of enjoy it. I just know power and torque went up.....and it won't blow up!
First aborted run showing AFR. Just seeing this made me glad I was getting it tuned properly!
Also, really cool you sharing some of the progression from pre to post tune, agreed looks like it was well worth it if not required (I'd say both).
@BaysideFab 567WHP K Series Turbo https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19241886
@BaysideFab 511WHP Honda K Series Turbo https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18677797
@BaysideFab485WHP Honda K Series Turbo * It Explodedhttps://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18323263
Chavis Performance 470WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18755339
zbomb FB buddy 470WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18352678
@zbomb 462WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
CPE LS3 438WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19213563
FB Post 434WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19264245
GT2 Car 428 WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19312663
Youtube 426WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18353264
Renegade 418WHP https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
TPC Racing 409WHP Supercharged M96 3.4 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@gtxracer 393WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18341989
@BRS-LN 382WHP M96 * NO COST or ENGINE DISPLACEMENT PROVIDEDhttps://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
Hartech from FB 370WHP M96 4.1 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18597947
gt3_bandit 365WHP GM LS https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@Peedster 349WHP M96 4.0 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18345960
@sdwindr1 347WHP M96 4.0 Autoworks, CO https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18992100
@lowpue 345WHP 997 M96 3.8 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18323744
@sdwindr1 336WHP M96 4.0 Autoworks, CO https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19035932
@2005 996 C4S 335WHP M96 4,0 FSI https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18348885
40AE BAT Auction 333WHP 4.0 FSI https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@Jengah 327WHP M96 3.8 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
Vivid Race Car 325WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@schroederhc1 324WHP M96 4.0 FSI https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18418970
@996C438 319WHP M96 3.8 FSI https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@golock911 318WHP M96 3.8 FSI https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18357400
@pszikla 318WHP M96 3.8 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18381442
4.0 FSI BAT Auction 311WHP https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@JSETarga 310WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18321626
@mehoff 309WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@e30rapidic 305WHP M96 4.0 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19449342
BAT X51 304WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@Justin76 301WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18550017
@yaz996 300WHP 3.8 M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19098848
@NYoutftr 291WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18326177
@Triple Black 291WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18344577
@hatchetf15 290WHP 3.8 M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19098676
@CTS 287WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@911STYL 284WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18348687
@G-Body 282WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@Falcon911 282WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
3.8 FSI BAT 278WHP https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
@RubberDuckie39264WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18686609
@BaysideFab 259WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18323263
@eric523 249WHP M96 https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post18352576
PCA IPD Plenum Test 3.4 - 246WHP https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...
Hoovie 243K Mile 3.4 - 240WHP https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...l#post19348972