Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2019 Engine Rebuild Comparison RND/FSI/EBS/Vertex

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2019, 11:18 AM
  #166  
wsrgklt
Racer
Thread Starter
 
wsrgklt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 437
Received 111 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NuttyProfessor
The factory shortblock has always been an attractive option for folks, but my question is... aside from the M97 bearing, does it contain all the known issues associated with these engines?
e.g. Lokasil bores, singular piston offset for both banks, etc.
@NuttyProfessor It addresses some issues, but not others. However, most cars run for a very long time without any of the major issues. So, someone who isn't going to put a ton of miles on the car can look at this in one of two ways:
1. It's another roll of the dice in a game where the odds are very much in your favor.
2. It resets the clock for an "inevitable" failure by many years.

Both of those are fine bets in my case. I can get this done at a fraction of the cost of an expensive rebuild that corrects every design flaw in the motor, and I'll still have the overwhelmingly good chance of driving trouble-free for the next decade.

Last edited by wsrgklt; 06-03-2019 at 03:16 PM.
Old 06-03-2019, 04:54 PM
  #167  
sequel95
Instructor
 
sequel95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 207
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

OP: Looks like the shop that will do the shortblock is also having the heads done. I'd think the M96 heads are somewhat complicated that some American muscle machine shops find too intricate to work on. FSI sends heads to a world class shop that knows M96 heads better than most in the US. I just had a Passat 1.8T 4 cyl head reworked and I spent $1500 or thereabouts. Did you estimate the head work in your short block estimate, as I don't know how a shop would do that part alone for under $3000 for the machine shop work alone. I'm definitely not an expert and have not shopped around. I did take my Passat 1.8T head to a muscle car shop and they were amazing, but they did comment on how German cars have a lot of tiny spaces that make work more challenging. Thank you for the informative thread!
Old 06-03-2019, 06:20 PM
  #168  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,273
Received 4,612 Likes on 2,094 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wsrgklt
@Porschetech3 Agreed. It looks reasonable to me. Not sure why Jake is sowing distrust here, except that the longer warranty from Porsche makes the FSI warranty offering look worse by comparison.

I do need to inquire about the minimum mileage requirements, as I don’t plan to do 6k miles per year. I will change the oil a couple times a year and I have a battery tender. Do you know what else is expected?

The minimum mileage requirement really apply's to the Porsche replacement battery. We had customers who would (knowingly) not drive their cars routinely or put a battery maintainer on it and the battery would fail after 18 months and would require to be replaced again. The requirement to drive at least 15 miles per day or 6k miles per year is to keep the battery charged, or buy the Porsche battery maintainer and use it, then if battery fails bring in the car and charger and have the battery maintainer checked along with the charging system.

Other things to consider when car is stored is overinflate tires (to keep from flat spoting), and add fuel stabilizer. You should check with your local Porsche dealer for any other requirements besides the routine maintenance described in the owners manual. Most Porsche owners do the maintenance more often than required.
Old 06-04-2019, 12:27 AM
  #169  
wsrgklt
Racer
Thread Starter
 
wsrgklt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 437
Received 111 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bazhart
This Autumn we hope to be in a position to export exchange blocks for all variants.
@bazhart Thanks for stopping by the thread. I've learned a ton from the things you've written on your website and on other forums. One of the main reasons I started this thread is so many of my searches lead back to Hartech, and I would get excited for a moment only to realize it's UK-only. As I stated in the first post, I wanted to collect rebuild options for the US in 2019.

There seems to be a market in the US for the Hartech offering. I hope you find a way to do business here. Pop back in this thread once you have blocks available for export, and we can add Hartech to the comparison spreadsheet.
Old 06-04-2019, 12:40 AM
  #170  
wsrgklt
Racer
Thread Starter
 
wsrgklt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 437
Received 111 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sequel95
OP: Looks like the shop that will do the shortblock is also having the heads done. I'd think the M96 heads are somewhat complicated that some American muscle machine shops find too intricate to work on. FSI sends heads to a world class shop that knows M96 heads better than most in the US. I just had a Passat 1.8T 4 cyl head reworked and I spent $1500 or thereabouts. Did you estimate the head work in your short block estimate, as I don't know how a shop would do that part alone for under $3000 for the machine shop work alone. I'm definitely not an expert and have not shopped around. I did take my Passat 1.8T head to a muscle car shop and they were amazing, but they did comment on how German cars have a lot of tiny spaces that make work more challenging. Thank you for the informative thread!
@sequel95 Yes, the short block estimate in the spreadsheet includes headwork. The cost is comparable to the quote from EBS Racing. My heads will go to a machine shop in near Chicago that specializes in European cars, including Lotus, Ferrari, and work for a high-volume Porsche indy shop. I'm not sure why your VW head cost so much...was it a high performance port and polish job? I'm not doing that stuff - just machining surfaces flat, replacing valve seats and other worn parts, and a valve job.
Old 06-04-2019, 12:42 AM
  #171  
wsrgklt
Racer
Thread Starter
 
wsrgklt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 437
Received 111 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
The minimum mileage requirement really apply's to the Porsche replacement battery. We had customers who would (knowingly) not drive their cars routinely or put a battery maintainer on it and the battery would fail after 18 months and would require to be replaced again. The requirement to drive at least 15 miles per day or 6k miles per year is to keep the battery charged, or buy the Porsche battery maintainer and use it, then if battery fails bring in the car and charger and have the battery maintainer checked along with the charging system.

Other things to consider when car is stored is overinflate tires (to keep from flat spoting), and add fuel stabilizer. You should check with your local Porsche dealer for any other requirements besides the routine maintenance described in the owners manual. Most Porsche owners do the maintenance more often than required.
@Porschetech3 That's helpful background info, and I'm already on top of all the things you recommend for storage. Thanks for all your input on this thread. I appreciate it.
Old 06-05-2019, 03:32 PM
  #172  
turbogrill
Racer
 
turbogrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 427
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Why would anyone pick the RND option for $20k when the FSI is $22k?

Ignoring shipping then the engines cost the same, unless you install the engine your self.

Just asking, I am sure the RND is great.
Old 06-05-2019, 03:50 PM
  #173  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,788
Received 1,166 Likes on 796 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbogrill
Why would anyone pick the RND option for $20k when the FSI is $22k?

Ignoring shipping then the engines cost the same, unless you install the engine your self.

Just asking, I am sure the RND is great.
Because the RND engine is basically "off the shelf" - i.e. no to short wait time... FSI is anywhere from 6 mos. - 1 year depending on how busy they happen to be...
Old 06-05-2019, 03:55 PM
  #174  
jobyt
Pro
 
jobyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 575
Received 307 Likes on 164 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dporto
Because the RND engine is basically "off the shelf" - i.e. no to short wait time... FSI is anywhere from 6 mos. - 1 year depending on how busy they happen to be...
Plus, if you have your original block, the FSI build will still qualify for a COA (I think), if that is something in which you're interested.
Old 06-05-2019, 04:47 PM
  #175  
wsrgklt
Racer
Thread Starter
 
wsrgklt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 437
Received 111 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbogrill
Why would anyone pick the RND option for $20k when the FSI is $22k?

Ignoring shipping then the engines cost the same, unless you install the engine your self.

Just asking, I am sure the RND is great.
I think the primary reason is wait time. As Jake stated above, FSI is booked solid for the next year and then there is a waiting list after that. That might be OK if you're doing an elective rebuild for an upgrade. However, if your car is currently not drivable, FSI isn't really a viable option.


Other reasons you might choose RND: you want to keep your car the stock displacement for the sake of originality, or you and Jake Raby don't think you would enjoy working together.
Old 06-05-2019, 07:09 PM
  #176  
wildbilly32
Drifting
 
wildbilly32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 3,110
Received 790 Likes on 506 Posts
Default

I don't know about everyone else but when I look at a 996 I have trouble determining if the engine is 3.6l or 3.8l on the inside. I believe the racing term is "stock appearing". I have a 2005 C4S, one 728 produced, and am having a 3.8 installed. I didn't go for a more aggressive build as it would require freer flowing exhaust and a 997 intake. I would have loved it but preferred to keep the car "stock appearing." To each their own...
Old 06-06-2019, 12:51 AM
  #177  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,290 Likes on 902 Posts
Default

Time makes the biggest impact on the decision between my engine, and anything else.

That said, 20k really doesn’t buy an engine here, anymore. Considering that we are now to November 2020 with engines that are proposed, and underway, I have had to query my suppliers and Mfrs to make sure that the prices will remain the same so far out.

They are not, so prices are going up for those transitioning from the wait list, into the program moving forward. We make the final invoice at the onset of the project, so being so far out takes a lot of preparation.

This year I had 8 engines “in stock” as Stage 1 and Stage 2 levels of preparation. None of these were advertised, and all sold in a 4 week period, as soon as spring hit. Each year over the winter I personally work over time to build a few “on- demand” engines for stock, and they always go fast to those who don’t care to lose their original engine numbers.
Old 06-06-2019, 08:57 AM
  #178  
wildbilly32
Drifting
 
wildbilly32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 3,110
Received 790 Likes on 506 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
Time makes the biggest impact on the decision between my engine, and anything else.

That said, 20k really doesn’t buy an engine here, anymore. Considering that we are now to November 2020 with engines that are proposed, and underway, I have had to query my suppliers and Mfrs to make sure that the prices will remain the same so far out.

They are not, so prices are going up for those transitioning from the wait list, into the program moving forward. We make the final invoice at the onset of the project, so being so far out takes a lot of preparation.

This year I had 8 engines “in stock” as Stage 1 and Stage 2 levels of preparation. None of these were advertised, and all sold in a 4 week period, as soon as spring hit. Each year over the winter I personally work over time to build a few “on- demand” engines for stock, and they always go fast to those who don’t care to lose their original engine numbers.
Just my personal opinion...it is/would be worth the wait.
Old 06-06-2019, 12:36 PM
  #179  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,290 Likes on 902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wildbilly32
Just my personal opinion...it is/would be worth the wait.
I figured this would be a good time to post part 1 of the video series that I will be doing with your 996. We will add parts to this as the build progresses, to show people what someone endures when they have bore scoring, and what we do to bring life back to the car, and make it so much better.

You can really hear the noise with this one when I back the car up, toward the camera. I shot this with an iPhone 10, and thats just the microphone from the phone picking the noise up that well... Yeah, “sounds like a lifter”...... NO, its NOT!

As we tear down the engine, and it moves through the processes, I’ll post more parts of this adventure, then once complete we will compile all the parts, and make that the volume 8 of the “Focus on Bore Scoring” series.

Here we go... Enjoy!
Old 06-06-2019, 01:43 PM
  #180  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,053
Received 807 Likes on 545 Posts
Default

Excellent series!

Billy you and your 996 are going to be famous...


Quick Reply: 2019 Engine Rebuild Comparison RND/FSI/EBS/Vertex



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:20 AM.