Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2007, 03:26 PM
  #1186  
Stummel
Pro
 
Stummel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 100-200 is faster than the Veyron.

Must be lots of fun to pass a Veyron WOT.
Old 05-19-2007, 04:13 PM
  #1187  
M-Phibian
Instructor
 
M-Phibian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stummel
The 100-200 is faster than the Veyron.

Must be lots of fun to pass a Veyron WOT.
I have to find one first.
Old 05-19-2007, 05:57 PM
  #1188  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

There is something wrong with your run IMO (looking at your chart on 6speed) - your second gear change takes ~0.4 secs (so quite slow) and the Gs drop from ~0.6G to 028G........ this does not look correct in my experience, given a slowish 0.4s change the Gs would normaly go negative or nearly negative.
To maintain a 0.28G acceleration at 95mph for 0.4s would need a lot more than 0.6G just before the change.
Still looks like a 60-130 groundbreaker
Old 05-19-2007, 07:26 PM
  #1189  
M-Phibian
Instructor
 
M-Phibian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I make nearly 800 ft lbs of torque to the wheels. That's probably why the G's come back so quickly.
Old 05-20-2007, 07:02 AM
  #1190  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M-Phibian
I make nearly 800 ft lbs of torque to the wheels. That's probably why the G's come back so quickly.
It is not the Gs coming back quickly which I am reffering to.


The portion I have marked in pink is your gearchange where there is zero positive Gs from 3.3s to 3.7s since your engine is decoupled from your drive -the longitudinal acceleration line should dip into negative Gs here as the car is being slowed down by drag (areo and mechanical), instead it only dips to ~0.28G so still showing a nice push in the back - not possible

The blue circle shows the torque coming back online and shows it delivering a ~0.45G hit.

To make it easier to envisage think about the thump in the back you get when you let the clutch back out after changing gear - well your graph is showing that the "thump" only goes up by ~0.17G whereas in reality it should be the full 0.45G.
Something's amiss

Also, where are you testing that is 120ft below sea level
Old 05-20-2007, 07:08 AM
  #1191  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe the underwater testing explains the "G,s " !!!!!!

Good to see the usual , non personal ,arguments back .

Geoff
Old 05-20-2007, 09:39 AM
  #1192  
ebaker
Pro
 
ebaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: TX USA
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've seen other speed/time graphs look like that. I think it's the smoothing function of the software that causes it.
Old 05-20-2007, 10:48 AM
  #1193  
M-Phibian
Instructor
 
M-Phibian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
It is not the Gs coming back quickly which I am reffering to.


The portion I have marked in pink is your gearchange where there is zero positive Gs from 3.3s to 3.7s since your engine is decoupled from your drive -the longitudinal acceleration line should dip into negative Gs here as the car is being slowed down by drag (areo and mechanical), instead it only dips to ~0.28G so still showing a nice push in the back - not possible

The blue circle shows the torque coming back online and shows it delivering a ~0.45G hit.

To make it easier to envisage think about the thump in the back you get when you let the clutch back out after changing gear - well your graph is showing that the "thump" only goes up by ~0.17G whereas in reality it should be the full 0.45G.
Something's amiss

Also, where are you testing that is 120ft below sea level
10' above. As far as something "amiss" on the graph....whatever it is or was doesn't seem to negatively impact the real-life acceleration capability of my car. She moves quite well.

Have a good one.
Old 05-22-2007, 08:00 AM
  #1194  
Acropora
Burning Brakes
 
Acropora's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Nice machine Scott. Now go find a Veyron to smoke!
Old 05-22-2007, 04:55 PM
  #1195  
Stummel
Pro
 
Stummel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

May I ask have much is a gallon of this 100 or even 117 octane stuff?
Old 05-22-2007, 08:57 PM
  #1196  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anywhere from 5 - 9 bucks a gallon depending where you live.
Old 05-22-2007, 09:00 PM
  #1197  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Acropora
Nice machine Scott. Now go find a Veyron to smoke!
I don't know your definition of "smoke" but unless you are only interested in short bursts the Veyron is in another league, especially 280 km/h and up. Drive one and report back.
Old 05-23-2007, 05:49 PM
  #1198  
Woodster
Drifting
 
Woodster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up We know Scott's car is extremely fast:

I am far from an expert TB and I know you may have your PHD but how would a graph look
if you were spinning and creating G's and then you let off (albeit very quickly--speed shift),
and the tires stopped spinning temporarily and "hooked up" ?
Just a thought as I have an AX-22 and can barely get it out of the box let alone decipher the 800 graphs it gives me from one run...

MK
Old 05-23-2007, 06:13 PM
  #1199  
graeme36s
Racer
 
graeme36s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having had the chance of a lifetime to drive a Veyron last September I can honestly tell you that it is not the most exiciting car I have ever driven. However it is the most civilised and fantastically competent bit of kit that you could ever wish for. This is a car that you can drive at the plus side of 200 mph on twisty French motorways and the only thing you have to worry about is pointing the car in the direction you wish to travel and concentrating on where you wish to position the car. Believe you me it really is in a different league to anything else you will ever get the opportunity to drive.
Old 05-31-2007, 07:45 PM
  #1200  
Stummel
Pro
 
Stummel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do we have any data for 993GT2 EVO II with ~600hp?

What should be the hp range for a full wing lightweight street 993 GT2 with 6.7s for 100-200kph?


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:01 AM.