Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2007, 02:48 AM
  #1261  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jussi
I have 295/30R18 michelin PS2.
My calculation gives diameter 61.52cm when using 3% compression.
.
I see. And if you adjust your numbers by 2.5% or anything less, you will be in 0.3G territory as I mentioned.

The adjustment as you are doing it is for low speeds, since the tire will compress under the load of acceleration, however once you reach higher speeds you need to reverse that factor because of tire expansion as a result of heat and centrifugal forces.

Most likely than not your speed will be higher than 220kph at 6050RPMs, for instance, TB993TT reached beyond 200kph with 295/30 tires before hitting his rev. limiter in 4th gear, so around 7000-7050RPMs, if you do the math, it is a zero adjustment to rolling circumference at 200 kph, but I think we are splitting hairs here.
Old 08-30-2007, 08:20 AM
  #1262  
Jussi
Pro
 
Jussi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the road..
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jean: check my ax test -topic
Old 08-30-2007, 11:40 AM
  #1263  
ebaker
Pro
 
ebaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: TX USA
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jussi
I have 295/30R18 michelin PS2.
My calculation gives diameter 61.52cm when using 3% compression.
Respectfully, I believe caculations of speed, power, and acceleration should use a tire's circumference and not the rolling radius. It's based on the distance traveled with each revolution of the tire, which does not change when the tire is compressed by loads. This all assumes no slipping. I don't believe the 3% compression correction factor should be used.
I also would be interested in seeing the data on all the engine parameters on your runs.
Old 10-03-2007, 10:04 PM
  #1264  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Whew, just made it through all 85 pages - took me a whole week. I have to say you 993tt guys are a compulsive bunch. Great info here. I would like to humbly add my data point - 997TT with GIAC ecu and AWE exhaust (200 cell cats). 100 octane, upper 85-90F with 70% or so humidity. Sea level, slight uphill run with no noticeable wind. No powershifting. Std weight car, driver 180lbs



100-200 kph about 7.3s and 60-130 mph about 8.4s.
Old 10-04-2007, 05:23 PM
  #1265  
pstoppani
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
pstoppani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, my motor is a victim of a botched attempt at getting a 60-130MPH measurement. On my third run I decided to try starting in 3rd (I did a couple that started in 4th) and sure enough, I blew the shift from 3 to 4th and got 2nd instead. I got to see 9500 RPM on the tach for the first time; and then the smoke

So far it looks like I just blew the crankshaft seal, but will know more next week.

Looks like it will be Spring before I can try it again, a bit more carefully!
Old 10-04-2007, 06:40 PM
  #1266  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

looks like my clutch did not like the GPS runs. Clutch is slipping badly now.
Old 10-04-2007, 08:38 PM
  #1267  
Basal Skull
Rennlist Member
 
Basal Skull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,926
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I got to see 9500 RPM on the tach for the first time; and then the smoke
clutch did not like the GPS runs. Clutch is slipping badly now
ouch, sorry to hear that guys! I guess these runs can take a toll on our cars....
Old 10-05-2007, 05:09 AM
  #1268  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Basal Skull
ouch, sorry to hear that guys! I guess these runs can take a toll on our cars....
The 60-130 should have no ill effects on a properly prepared car. The gear change is an (embarrassing ) driver error and could happen during any spirited "session".
The clutch sounds like an incorrectly specced "tune" - Tuners worth their salt will know how much torque the stock clutch can hold and will spec accordingly.

No excuses -lets have some more
Old 10-05-2007, 09:07 AM
  #1269  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

It's not the 60-130 that eats the clutch, it's the 0-60 that precedes it
Old 10-05-2007, 01:02 PM
  #1270  
pstoppani
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
pstoppani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
The gear change is an (embarrassing ) driver error and could happen during any spirited "session".
Indeed
Old 10-05-2007, 02:07 PM
  #1271  
ScottMellor
Drifting
 
ScottMellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Westlake Village CA.
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OUCH!
At my first drivers ed, I was given some brilliant advice on how to avoid the "3-2 MONEY up-shift".
When you go from 3rd to 4th, reach down with your palm facing down and away from you. With your open hand just push the gear lever back and into 4rth. The spring loading keeps you in the gate and if you completely screw up in the heat of battle, you can ONLY end up in 6th.
It really works.
Now ifI could just find a trick to keep from turning on the windshield wipers other than removing the fuse or blades ....
Old 10-05-2007, 03:11 PM
  #1272  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
Whew, just made it through all 85 pages - took me a whole week. I have to say you 993tt guys are a compulsive bunch. Great info here.


100-200 kph about 7.3s and 60-130 mph about 8.4s.
Compulsive? Have you been to the 996TT board lately?

Great times, these 997TTs will never cease to amaze me, excellent performance! I would look at the 60-130mph as a real life check up of the car. This test is not being rough on it (unless one goes wild), but it can show you the latent weaknesses, such as clutch, overboost, loose IC hoses etc... Isn't it better than if you had the clutch go bad during your upcoming Texas Mile?

Originally Posted by pstoppani
I blew the shift from 3 to 4th and got 2nd instead. I got to see 9500 RPM on the tach for the first time; and then the smoke

So far it looks like I just blew the crankshaft seal, but will know more next week.
Pete, I had this happen to me at the race track, and it was VERY violent, I released the clutch too and almost hit the wall as a result . The engine did not suffer any damage then that I could feel, however I did blow the main seal a bit later, this is the cranckase seal I am talking about. The only reason it would smoke with the seal failure is if the oil is dripping on the headers. Good luck.
Old 10-05-2007, 04:38 PM
  #1273  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,044
Received 1,220 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
Isn't it better than if you had the clutch go bad during your upcoming Texas Mile?

That's what I keep reminding myself. Actually I am quite happy it did not let loose a couple of weeks ago during the track event. I had been anticipating the need for the upgraded clutch for some time now. At least there will be one less thing in the back of my mind to worry about for now...

BTW If interested I have a shop that can fab inconel manifolds for anyone interested. They have just finished 996/997 jigs for me, and 993 jigs can be done with a donor set of manifolds.
Old 10-07-2007, 10:48 PM
  #1274  
Bill S.
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
It's not the 60-130 that eats the clutch, it's the 0-60 that precedes it
No need to start from 0. That's the beauty of the 60 to 130 test. It's easy on the car.

Start from about 30 MPH in 2nd or 3rd gear and then floor it, taking each gear to redline. Start in the gear that gives you the fastest 60 to 130. That's probably 3rd gear for your car.
Old 10-14-2007, 06:10 AM
  #1275  
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,748
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Here's a 9.66 second 60-130 run with a UMW stage 2 set-up. There's probably some more time to be saved in the shifts but not a huge amount.

Speed, intake air temp and altitude are aganst the left axis while boost and longitudinal g are against the right axis. Data recorded with a Race Technology DL1.

IAT is from tapping into the factory sensor in the intercooler and boost is meaured using an external sensor.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: 60-130 MPH: New performance measurement!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:12 AM.