Can you accept that the new hybrid was built from a "defensive" perspective ?
#31
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#32
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#33
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The following 2 users liked this post by ipse dixit:
Timeless992 (06-22-2024),
Tobeit (06-22-2024)
The following users liked this post:
Mike2000 (06-23-2024)
#35
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Last edited by yrralis1; 06-22-2024 at 03:56 PM.
#36
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Forget about the engine and all the hoopla of the other thread . This discussion points at the entire reason the enormous effort and complicated engine came tk be in the first place .
Can you accept that premise without questioning it ? If not , thats easy , you wont buy the car. You might wait to see what other models arrive in 26 . Some are just holding onto the car they have trying to justify that it's not stagnation . Lets face it , even if you are like me and cant stand the idea of this engine the new car did destroy the old car in every performance category and I take this as though Porsche could have done it WITHOUT a hybrid . It's my opinion that Porsche is charging a lot of money for the cars . They keep raising the price and while some here write that a "75K ADM" is not puke worthy I take a totally different view . I feel that even MSRP pricing if its not perfect I am not buying it . I realized that when I started building poverty spec cars to hedge the loss if I hated it and bailed out . If I loved the car I would have gone forward with a full spec .
Heres the discussion . More people are beginning to get it . Some wil say previous car changes were controversial but not like this . It is repeatedly being questioned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTUlHJGc0nw
Can you accept that premise without questioning it ? If not , thats easy , you wont buy the car. You might wait to see what other models arrive in 26 . Some are just holding onto the car they have trying to justify that it's not stagnation . Lets face it , even if you are like me and cant stand the idea of this engine the new car did destroy the old car in every performance category and I take this as though Porsche could have done it WITHOUT a hybrid . It's my opinion that Porsche is charging a lot of money for the cars . They keep raising the price and while some here write that a "75K ADM" is not puke worthy I take a totally different view . I feel that even MSRP pricing if its not perfect I am not buying it . I realized that when I started building poverty spec cars to hedge the loss if I hated it and bailed out . If I loved the car I would have gone forward with a full spec .
Heres the discussion . More people are beginning to get it . Some wil say previous car changes were controversial but not like this . It is repeatedly being questioned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTUlHJGc0nw
Porsche could not have maintained gts power levels in the EU without needing a 400v system for the e turbo, at which point they may as well go full hybrid.
Last edited by malba2366; 06-22-2024 at 04:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Res Ips (06-22-2024)
#37
#38
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was a bit skeptical at first but the more I read about the GTS the more I like it. Looking forward to the reviews. I’m sure they will be impressive. If you price out a base to the same comparative spec for a GTS, it’s only about a 20k difference and the GTS has so much more included excluding the powertrain. I’m hoping to get one but don’t think there are any allocations as of yet.
The following 3 users liked this post by Jon70:
#39
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My last comment on this thread….
Yes, “politics” played a part in the automotive direction and timeline used by manufacturers. So what? That’s true of almost everything. Federal and state “mandates”/regulations have been around a very long time. There’s nothing new about Government telling you what to do. The Government is suppose to work for us ALL….or at least the majority of people…and last time I looked, the vast majority of Americans want something done to address global warming…as they do about the rampant proliferation of guns (but that’s the subject for another forum)…or about immigration reform, etc.
As far as Porsche’s move to electrification of its cars, I’m 100% certain, like all business decisions, was motivated by several reasons, including political/legal mandates, as well as financial/economic survival. We all understand the political motivations…but the economic aspects of the decision is often overlooked. Case in point - in 2023, 25% of all new cars sold in germany were EV’s, and despite the slow-down in sales, EV sales are still increasing. People were not forced to buy these EV’s…they bought them for an assortment of reasons.. So, irrespective of the political mandates, if I’m the CEO of a car company, do I ignore the fact that an increasing number of consumers want EV’s, or do I listen to the conservatives that want us to forge ahead and continue making only ICE cars…and hope that one day, the company doesn’t find it’s self being left behind the EV revolution? To be clear, I’m not advocating an either/or solution. Lot of companies went out of business because they didn’t keep up with innovative trends that people wanted…look at what Amazon did to Sears and a lot of other brick and mortar companies.
As a former owner of a high tech company, I know you can’t continue to live off of prior accomplishments. Being conservative in business can lead to stagnation…and stagnation in any business is simply not good business practice. And that’s especially true in a highly dynamic sector, like EV’s.
It is projected that by 2026, EV’s will be cheaper to manufacturer (including the battery) than ICE cars. That’s good for consumers and for manufacturing profits. Charging infrastructure is still continuing to expand. Sold-state batteries that offer 500+ miles of range are already being tested by a number of companies, including Toyota. EV technologies are relatively new when compared to ICE…and look how far they’ve come in 10+ years. Sky is the limit.
But for conservatives (per the definition, is someone that resists change and innovation), such as yourself, resisting progress is part of who you are. But at age 66 (if memory serves me), you won’t be closed out from getting an ICE car anytime soon. Passing the State driver’s exam is likely to be the limit on your options. .
Last edited by CodyBigdog; 06-22-2024 at 04:58 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by CodyBigdog:
#40
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We’ve become a nation that no loner reads. It’s all about clicks.
#41
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#42
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was a bit skeptical at first but the more I read about the GTS the more I like it. Looking forward to the reviews. I’m sure they will be impressive. If you price out a base to the same comparative spec for a GTS, it’s only about a 20k difference and the GTS has so much more included excluding the powertrain. I’m hoping to get one but don’t think there are any allocations as of yet.
You also know the reviews will gush over it . Most auto journalists are monetized and their you tube channel makes $$ off clicks and likes .
They want too be invited to journalist day . Jason was granted an interview with a Porsche engineer so dont think for even one second that words are measured .
#43
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My last comment on this thread….
Yes, “politics” played a part in the automotive direction and timeline used by manufacturers. So what? That’s true of almost everything. Federal and state “mandates”/regulations have been around a very long time. There’s nothing new about Government telling you what to do. The Government is suppose to work for us ALL….or at least the majority of people…and last time I looked, the vast majority of Americans want something done to address global warming…as they do about the rampant proliferation of guns (but that’s the subject for another forum)…or about immigration reform, etc.
.
Yes, “politics” played a part in the automotive direction and timeline used by manufacturers. So what? That’s true of almost everything. Federal and state “mandates”/regulations have been around a very long time. There’s nothing new about Government telling you what to do. The Government is suppose to work for us ALL….or at least the majority of people…and last time I looked, the vast majority of Americans want something done to address global warming…as they do about the rampant proliferation of guns (but that’s the subject for another forum)…or about immigration reform, etc.
.
You obviously dont know because you somehow cant look up what they wrote in black and white .
This condenses it for you . https://www.instituteforenergyresear...ed%20by%202032.
The following users liked this post:
Hunky (06-22-2024)
#44
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#45
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What do you personally like about it ? We already know its faster . 718 was faster too but the 4 cylinder failed .Its an example of where faster is not necessarily better .
You also know the reviews will gush over it . Most auto journalists are monetized and their you tube channel makes $$ off clicks and likes .
They want too be invited to journalist day . Jason was granted an interview with a Porsche engineer so dont think for even one second that words are measured .
You also know the reviews will gush over it . Most auto journalists are monetized and their you tube channel makes $$ off clicks and likes .
They want too be invited to journalist day . Jason was granted an interview with a Porsche engineer so dont think for even one second that words are measured .
The following 2 users liked this post by Tobeit:
Timeless992 (06-22-2024),
user 999993337 (06-22-2024)