Can you accept that the new hybrid was built from a "defensive" perspective ?
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Can you accept that the new hybrid was built from a "defensive" perspective ?
Forget about the engine and all the hoopla of the other thread . This discussion points at the entire reason the enormous effort and complicated engine came tk be in the first place .
Can you accept that premise without questioning it ? If not , thats easy , you wont buy the car. You might wait to see what other models arrive in 26 . Some are just holding onto the car they have trying to justify that it's not stagnation . Lets face it , even if you are like me and cant stand the idea of this engine the new car did destroy the old car in every performance category and I take this as though Porsche could have done it WITHOUT a hybrid . It's my opinion that Porsche is charging a lot of money for the cars . They keep raising the price and while some here write that a "75K ADM" is not puke worthy I take a totally different view . I feel that even MSRP pricing if its not perfect I am not buying it . I realized that when I started building poverty spec cars to hedge the loss if I hated it and bailed out . If I loved the car I would have gone forward with a full spec .
Heres the discussion . More people are beginning to get it . Some wil say previous car changes were controversial but not like this . It is repeatedly being questioned.
Can you accept that premise without questioning it ? If not , thats easy , you wont buy the car. You might wait to see what other models arrive in 26 . Some are just holding onto the car they have trying to justify that it's not stagnation . Lets face it , even if you are like me and cant stand the idea of this engine the new car did destroy the old car in every performance category and I take this as though Porsche could have done it WITHOUT a hybrid . It's my opinion that Porsche is charging a lot of money for the cars . They keep raising the price and while some here write that a "75K ADM" is not puke worthy I take a totally different view . I feel that even MSRP pricing if its not perfect I am not buying it . I realized that when I started building poverty spec cars to hedge the loss if I hated it and bailed out . If I loved the car I would have gone forward with a full spec .
Heres the discussion . More people are beginning to get it . Some wil say previous car changes were controversial but not like this . It is repeatedly being questioned.
Last edited by yrralis1; 06-22-2024 at 11:43 AM.
#2
I’ll help you out here:
https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1415...is-better.html
Porsche to yrralis1: “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out”
Time will tell who’s right. The market will determine that, not a bunch of Internet yahoo’s.
https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1415...is-better.html
Porsche to yrralis1: “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out”
Time will tell who’s right. The market will determine that, not a bunch of Internet yahoo’s.
Last edited by CodyBigdog; 06-22-2024 at 11:45 AM.
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I’ll help you out here:
https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1415...is-better.html
Porsche to yrralis1: “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out”
Time will tell who’s right. The market will determine that, not a bunch of Internet yahoo’s.
https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1415...is-better.html
Porsche to yrralis1: “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out”
Time will tell who’s right. The market will determine that, not a bunch of Internet yahoo’s.
It would have been a lot easier for you to say you disagree with the guy or that you are buying one regardless .In short your answer was "yes" to the thread title question ?
Regardless , it is an indisputable fact that Porsche did the engine gymnastics to satisfy politicians.
He did touch upon something long term too. If long term ownership becomes a high cost risk exposure then those cars get traded for new ones . His point was that the only environmentalist metric looked at was emissions rather than the big picture .
Last edited by yrralis1; 06-22-2024 at 12:14 PM.
#4
God give it a rest.
The following 21 users liked this post by Icegrill:
5thGen Texan (06-23-2024),
aggie57 (06-22-2024),
AlexCeres (06-22-2024),
dapangro (06-23-2024),
elvisdoc (06-23-2024),
and 16 others liked this post.
#5
Those "internet yahoos" are the paying customers which comprise a portion of the "market" . Those who make it to forums are often repeat buyers too .
It would have been a lot easier for you to say you disagree with the guy or that you are buying one regardless .
Regardless , it is an indisputable fact that Porsche did the engine gymnastics to satisfy politicians.
He did touch upon something long term too. If long term ownership becomes a high cost risk exposure then those cars get traded for new ones . His point was that the only environmentalist metric looked at was emissions rather than the big picture .
It would have been a lot easier for you to say you disagree with the guy or that you are buying one regardless .
Regardless , it is an indisputable fact that Porsche did the engine gymnastics to satisfy politicians.
He did touch upon something long term too. If long term ownership becomes a high cost risk exposure then those cars get traded for new ones . His point was that the only environmentalist metric looked at was emissions rather than the big picture .
As I said (you can read, right??): The market will determine whether Porsche has chosen wisely? We’ll know more after a full year of sales for the 992.2….although, some buyers might delay, as many of us tend to avoid the first year of most new products.
People can look at the 992.2 and see (believe) what they want…but I don’t look at the 992.2 as any Porsche product that will greatly lower their fleet carbon emissions. The design is such that the battery is too small (103 lbs) to even allow the car to propel itself in all EV mode. It’s just there as a kick in the butt when needed. The real emissions lowering vehicles will go to Porsche’s all electric SUV’s and the Taycan.
Last edited by CodyBigdog; 06-22-2024 at 12:23 PM.
The following users liked this post:
melhechi (06-22-2024)
#7
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Take a loot at Ford . They had all the "gottahaveit" buyers for the Mach E . Then it went DEAD !!!!
They cut the price of the car and still can't get rid of them
.https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...%20%2452%2C395.
Same with GM .. Yeah sure ..
https://www.thecarconnection.com/new...price-by-6-520
Go ahead .. blow 200K and wait for the market to talk to you .
Trending Topics
#8
All cars are built from a defensive position, heck I’d say all engineering efforts come from a defensive position if you frame it that way. I an an engineer, I design electronics, so I have to be defensive and comply to UL, FCC, NEC, and a host of other rules and regulations, not to mention cost.
We get it, you don’t like it. There are plenty of other cars on the market. Keep your 992.1 or buy something different. Porsche isn’t going to ditch this powertrain after investing millions because 5 guys on rennlist aren’t happy. The car will sell well, it’ll perform well, it may have a few technical bugs for the first model year which will be covered by warranty. Can we move on?
We get it, you don’t like it. There are plenty of other cars on the market. Keep your 992.1 or buy something different. Porsche isn’t going to ditch this powertrain after investing millions because 5 guys on rennlist aren’t happy. The car will sell well, it’ll perform well, it may have a few technical bugs for the first model year which will be covered by warranty. Can we move on?
The following 9 users liked this post by Brad Stinson:
CodyBigdog (06-22-2024),
elvisdoc (06-23-2024),
incoming992s (06-23-2024),
M3Inline6 (06-23-2024),
mcacs1 (06-23-2024),
and 4 others liked this post.
#9
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
That was in fact the title of Car and Driver's article .https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a6...brid-revealed/
The following users liked this post:
Hunky (06-22-2024)
#10
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
The following 2 users liked this post by yrralis1:
Denny Swift (06-22-2024),
Hunky (06-22-2024)
#11
It's been a long time -- the early 1970s? -- since car buyers were the primary customers that a car company has to satisfy.
Once you understand that, it saves a lot head-scratching and thread-creating.
Once you understand that, it saves a lot head-scratching and thread-creating.
#12
You already know how the market will play out . There will be those initial "gottahaveit " buyers . Then we see the real market but by then the guy spending 200 K today takes the chance and thats what preliminary discussions are all about . You dont have to participate . For some reason you feel compelled to reply .
Take a loot at Ford . They had all the "gottahaveit" buyers for the Mach E . Then it went DEAD !!!!
They cut the price of the car and still can't get rid of them
.https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...%20%2452%2C395.
Same with GM .. Yeah sure ..
https://www.thecarconnection.com/new...price-by-6-520
Go ahead .. blow 200K and wait for the market to talk to you .
Take a loot at Ford . They had all the "gottahaveit" buyers for the Mach E . Then it went DEAD !!!!
They cut the price of the car and still can't get rid of them
.https://www.reuters.com/business/aut...%20%2452%2C395.
Same with GM .. Yeah sure ..
https://www.thecarconnection.com/new...price-by-6-520
Go ahead .. blow 200K and wait for the market to talk to you .
As far as what I will do…as I stated in a prior post, I will be one of those people that NEVER buys the first year of a new model. I’m a wait and see kind of guy, and not one of those people that needs the newest shiny thing in the neighborhood.
Last edited by CodyBigdog; 06-22-2024 at 12:30 PM.
#13
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
All cars are built from a defensive position, heck I’d say all engineering efforts come from a defensive position if you frame it that way. I an an engineer, I design electronics, so I have to be defensive and comply to UL, FCC, NEC, and a host of other rules and regulations, not to mention cost.
We get it, you don’t like it. There are plenty of other cars on the market. Keep your 992.1 or buy something different. Porsche isn’t going to ditch this powertrain after investing millions because 5 guys on rennlist aren’t happy. The car will sell well, it’ll perform well, it may have a few technical bugs for the first model year which will be covered by warranty. Can we move on?
We get it, you don’t like it. There are plenty of other cars on the market. Keep your 992.1 or buy something different. Porsche isn’t going to ditch this powertrain after investing millions because 5 guys on rennlist aren’t happy. The car will sell well, it’ll perform well, it may have a few technical bugs for the first model year which will be covered by warranty. Can we move on?
Let's hope they spare the Gt cars and don t hold it to Lambda =1 even if NA . We wil, know in 26.
#14
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
No, the market has NOT yet spoken about the desirability, or lack thereof, of the 992.2. But even that has two components to it….(1) Will the hybrid aspect of the car help/hurt sales…given its better performance numbers, and (2) Will consumers finally back off from Porshce's inflated pricing of their cars?
As far as what I will do…as I stated in a prior post, I will be one of those people that NEVER buys the first year of a new model. I’m a wait and see kind of guy, and not one of those people that needs the newest shiny thing in the neighborhood.
As far as what I will do…as I stated in a prior post, I will be one of those people that NEVER buys the first year of a new model. I’m a wait and see kind of guy, and not one of those people that needs the newest shiny thing in the neighborhood.
#15
That was in fact the title of Car and Driver's article .https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a6...brid-revealed/
Last edited by Hunky; 06-22-2024 at 12:42 PM.