When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Interesting on the US configurator the GTS no longer has rear seats, but are a $0 add back. Wonder if that rear seat delete was included in the +51kg / 110lb increase in weight.
Can still option the extended range fuel tank on GTS, but capacity slightly smaller at 22.1 gal.
Interesting on the US configurator the GTS no longer has rear seats, but are a $0 add back. Wonder if that rear seat delete was included in the +51kg / 110lb increase in weight.
It is the same as the cayenne. It is fine. More info available since you have a choice now to display what you want. Not saying it is better than the analog one but it is what it is, it is final and no choice and at least there are some positive points.
I admit that I was wrong about the power prediction and sorry silversurfer for not believing you. I did say I’ll come here and post either way right/wrong.
I see price has gone up 10% for GTS. Thats pretty massive.
I see when accounting for weight increase, power bump is 50 hp which is still substantial. That being said watching 1/4 mile and the nurburgring time, I would have expected much more. The 1/4 mile race had perhaps 0.1s improvement maybe 0.2s. 8.7 seconds in Nurburgring can easily attributeable to the large wing, larger tires, suspension tuning. 50 hp should really be a bigger gap. I guess we’ll need to wait for magazines to drive them.
Also I’m sure the 1595 kg figure is the lightweight package with no rear seats, light glass, buckets, etc. Without those and with sunroof, its probably another 50-60kg.
05-28-2024 | 10:27 AM
