992 Carrera T Club
The following 4 users liked this post by wazway:
#3362
Congrats again
#3363
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Long Island, NY; South Florida
Posts: 4,083
Received 4,066 Likes
on
1,761 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Scott P (01-04-2023)
#3364
Okay Gentleman (and ladies)... I have some unfortunate "official" news. The manager of my dealership just emailed me an update for the Carrera T. As of today the internal Porsche Cars North America message board was updated with the following message: "Due to increased demand for the Full Carbon Bucket Seats on GT3, GT4RS and Dakar Models launched for MY23, the 992 Carrera T will not be offered with full bucket seats for MY23. We hope the situation will improve by the time MY24 is announced, but we cannot promise a firm timeline."
#3365
Instructor
My discussion with my SA today stated that if I cancel my order, the refreshed 992.2 will only offer the base model (as a hybrid) until 2025 or so when more of the 992.2s get released. AKA the T will only be the final model year parts car.
#3366
Rennlist Member
Thank you for this! I need to be more positive about the fact that I'm getting an INCREDIBLE car and one option won't ruin it... Im actually really excited that now I can afford to do the Carbon Roof... I think Carbon Roof on the Rubystar paint is going to be a killer combo, break up the color nicely and be a real talking piece at the track and at car events!
Heres to finalizing the build and moving forward!
Heres to finalizing the build and moving forward!
The following 4 users liked this post by Scott P:
#3367
Instructor
Okay Gentleman (and ladies)... I have some unfortunate "official" news. The manager of my dealership just emailed me an update for the Carrera T. As of today the internal Porsche Cars North America message board was updated with the following message: "Due to increased demand for the Full Carbon Bucket Seats on GT3, GT4RS and Dakar Models launched for MY23, the 992 Carrera T will not be offered with full bucket seats for MY23. We hope the situation will improve by the time MY24 is announced, but we cannot promise a firm timeline."
Mentally Moving on!! I have added the carbon roof instead of the seats and will figure out any other changes in the next couple days... This really makes me question the 4-way vs. 18-way again now!! ugh I just feel like im going to regret the choice either way.
Mentally Moving on!! I have added the carbon roof instead of the seats and will figure out any other changes in the next couple days... This really makes me question the 4-way vs. 18-way again now!! ugh I just feel like im going to regret the choice either way.
Unfortunately, these were important enough to me that I'm rethinking whether or not I proceed with the car.
The following users liked this post:
balucipher (01-04-2023)
#3368
Instructor
Like you, I'm stuck on color. If I proceed with the car considering the no carbon buckets news, Guards and Python are the two front-runners. For me, sport design front and rear all the way. Not a fan of that massive, boxy black plastic grin out front or the uninterrupted bulbous caboose. The full Sport Design pack breaks up both very nicely.
The following 2 users liked this post by BaxterPup:
balucipher (01-04-2023),
wazway (01-05-2023)
#3369
Racer
Hmm, I don't want any chrome. I'll see if I can check this out on a car at my dealer to see how big the chrome ring is on PDLS+.
In addition to dynamic cornering lights (swivel lighting), PDLS+ has this -
In addition to dynamic cornering lights (swivel lighting), PDLS+ has this -
- Speed-Dependent Headlight Range Control - Speed-dependent headlight range control increases light distribution after 3,300 feet at 68 mph or higher, or immediately after 81 mph and above provided the steering wheel is not turned sharply.
My summary, PDLS is good / fine. PDLS'plus' is a half-baked solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist to any competent driver.
The following users liked this post:
balucipher (01-04-2023)
#3370
The following 2 users liked this post by FORENN:
balucipher (01-04-2023),
HerrDr (01-04-2023)
#3371
As comment on the 'plus' part of PDLS+, I have never found it useful / needed / accurate. Two cars with the system and it is NOT anywhere close to as good as an engaged driver choosing when / where / how to utilize high beams.
My summary, PDLS is good / fine. PDLS'plus' is a half-baked solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist to any competent driver.
My summary, PDLS is good / fine. PDLS'plus' is a half-baked solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist to any competent driver.
PDLS+ includes the following, only the first 3 seem useful.
Includes:
- Dynamic Cornering Light - Dynamic cornering lights swivel the low beam in accordance with cornering characteristics, depending on the steering angle.
- Speed-Dependent Headlight Range Control - Speed-dependent headlight range control increases light distribution after 3,300 feet at 68 mph or higher, or immediately after 81 mph and above provided the steering wheel is not turned sharply.
- Sport Mode - Activated in Sport mode - allows for greater swivel angle depending on steering input.
- High Beam Assistant - When a camera located inside the rear-view mirror detects the headlights of an oncoming vehicle, the high beams are automatically turned off at a distance of approximately 2,600 feet. If the taillights of a vehicle traveling in front are detected, the high beam is then turned off at a distance of approximately 1,300 feet
#3372
Rennlist Member
There may be other examples of this, but it does look like the US and UK get the short end of the stick on this one
The following 3 users liked this post by reechar:
#3373
Thinking about doing a cheaper build than what I submitted with just the performance options and a smattering of free options and the roof prep:
http://www.porsche-code.com/PP1ID4V5
Could go either way on the cf roof but you guys discussing it breaking up all the Ruby got me to leave it on in this version.
http://www.porsche-code.com/PP1ID4V5
Could go either way on the cf roof but you guys discussing it breaking up all the Ruby got me to leave it on in this version.
#3374
Instructor
Thanks for sharing this as I'd been hanging my hat on this image from the Doug DeMuro Carrera T video. Assumed that if provided with a U.S. press car, certainly they'll be made available. lol
Unfortunately, these were important enough to me that I'm rethinking whether or not I proceed with the car.
Unfortunately, these were important enough to me that I'm rethinking whether or not I proceed with the car.
The following 3 users liked this post by F1SML8R:
#3375
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Long Island, NY; South Florida
Posts: 4,083
Received 4,066 Likes
on
1,761 Posts
First and foremost, T = manual on a base. Add to that PTV, RAS and PASM. To me that's a heck of a combo, even without LWB or PCCB.
The following 4 users liked this post by AdamIsAdam: