Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2017 LeMans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2017, 06:04 PM
  #166  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Someone please and explain why LMP should be of interest and why I should
care?
The July issue of Racecar Engineering goes into detail of why (i.e. R&D: eMotion, next-918, etc.) Porsche is so gung-ho on the 919.
Old 06-19-2017, 06:09 PM
  #167  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
Racing has been as much about R&D as it has been marketing. The prototype is paving the way for testing future technology in porsche street cars.
So if Toyota pulls out, then Porsche will continue to 'race' in LMP1 all by its lonely self and enjoy all these benefits in marketing and R&D?

EDIT: Is Porsche even competing with Toyota in the car market?
Old 06-19-2017, 06:13 PM
  #168  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,869 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
What they learn in the Prototype trickles down to the RSR and street car line-up, espcially the hybrid system for street cars.
Been this way for years.... brake technology, balance, aero etc. All learned from the race track.
Look at how the porsche race cars in the 60s and 70s (917) developed brake technology in the future 911 line up.

Look at porsche hybrid street cars today and soon 992 hybrid street cars of tomorrow.
Look at RSR now with mid engine.

Racing has been as much about R&D as it has been marketing. The prototype is paving the way for testing future technology in porsche street cars.
So how are all of the other manufacturers doing it without racing prototypes?

And if you're getting little to no brand/marketing benefit from it, there is no sense in spending money participating in these race series'. They could do the exact same testing and development privately for a **** ton less money. LMP racing is nothing more than a really expensive approach to development, one that Porsche can afford because they've convinced customers that a leather fuse box cover is a must have.
Old 06-19-2017, 06:18 PM
  #169  
signes
Rennlist Member
 
signes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 4,255
Received 629 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Fake marshal, I thought they were joking. Unbelievable...

https://streamable.com/kvdca
Old 06-19-2017, 06:29 PM
  #170  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
So if Toyota pulls out, then Porsche will continue to 'race' in LMP1 all by its lonely self and enjoy all these benefits in marketing and R&D?

EDIT: Is Porsche even competing with Toyota in the car market?
Porsche more likely to pull out than Toyota; Akio made public statements all but assuring their presence next year.

If Porsche pull out and Toyota were to compete against no other OEM in LMP1 next year and "win" that would be absolutely farcical.
Old 06-19-2017, 06:35 PM
  #171  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 813 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
So how are all of the other manufacturers doing it without racing prototypes?

And if you're getting little to no brand/marketing benefit from it, there is no sense in spending money participating in these race series'. They could do the exact same testing and development privately for a **** ton less money. LMP racing is nothing more than a really expensive approach to development, one that Porsche can afford because they've convinced customers that a leather fuse box cover is a must have.
Bingo!

So if LMP is all about providing the rich with the next improved 918, (yawn), it has no interest to me. Next.

Ford didn't need an LMP to kick a$$. Bull chit. Neither did Aston. Hmm come to think of it... Neither did Ferrari.

PAG finished first in a two man race. Hip hip hooray. Hat trick! Give me a break. Sheesh.

All GT3 owners and future buyers are getting their panties in a wad over keeping the flat 6 NA and 6 sp mt and thats all they want we don't need all the "wonderful" stuff they are supposedly learning in LMP. The GT3 will be relegated to a non competitive fun to drive sports car.

In the meantime my cars so called racing representative the RSR nad R hasn't done so well and they may not even homologate the mid engine 911 in the near future if ever. Seems like PAG needs to start geting their heads out of their a$$ in WEC.

Ford made another kick a$$ FGT in less than 2 years and it won first year out without an "LMP" program. Fords sell for a fraction of any Porsche. PAG saw the Ford GT coming for at least two years. Did nothing except enjoy their fat profit margins and rest on their laurels.

I hope PAG is reading this. They're not impressing me. How about you?
Old 06-19-2017, 06:38 PM
  #172  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
Porsche more likely to pull out than Toyota; Akio made public statements all but assuring their presence next year.

If Porsche pull out and Toyota were to compete against no other OEM in LMP1 next year and "win" that would be absolutely farcical.
The point was that it's already farcical as it is, whether there is a Toyota to compete against or not.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:04 PM
  #173  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Bingo!

So if LMP is all about providing the rich with the next improved 918, (yawn), it has no interest to me. Next.

Ford didn't need an LMP to kick a$$. Bull chit. Neither did Aston. Hmm come to think of it... Neither did Ferrari.

PAG finished first in a two man race. Hip hip hooray. Hat trick! Give me a break. Sheesh.

All GT3 owners and future buyers are getting their panties in a wad over keeping the flat 6 NA and 6 sp mt and thats all they want we don't need all the "wonderful" stuff they are supposedly learning in LMP. The GT3 will be relegated to a non competitive fun to drive sports car.

In the meantime my cars so called racing representative the RSR nad R hasn't done so well and they may not even homologate the mid engine 911 in the near future if ever. Seems like PAG needs to start get heads out of their a$$ in WEC.

Ford made another kick a$$ FGT in less than 2 years and it won first year out without an "LMP" program. Fords sell for a fraction of any Porsche. PAG saw the Ford GT coming for at least two years. Did nothing except enjoy their fat profit margins and rest on their laurels.

I hope PAG is reading this. They're not impressing me.
LMP is all about pushing boundaries and developing technology on the absolute cutting edge.

As a result, Porsche will probably be able - in a few short years - to sell you a car that looks like a 911, costs like a (high end) 911, and will outperform a 918 comprehensively.

Ford is not a performance car company. At all. They didn't build the GT themselves; outsourced to Multimatic. As for the road cars, they have had numerous issues with fit and finish among those few delivered thus far, per a gentleman who is due his GT next year - saw him at another friend's wedding over the weekend. He may pass on the car as a result.

Aston Martin has almost always operated on a shoestring budget; they are only remotely competitive due to BOP. I believe they are 65 kg BELOW the class's minimum weight threshold. Other cars are ABOVE the minimum weight threshold. Clearly, the ACO wants Aston Martin at Le Mans!

Ferrari has Formula One.

As for homologation of the mid-engined RSR, it is already homologated to the current GTE rulebook WITHOUT waivers. Period. There is NO requirement to build a road car.

Originally Posted by hf1
The point was that it's already farcical as it is, whether there is a Toyota to compete against or not.
I'm sorry, I disagree. The last few years of Hybrid LMP1 racing have provided outstanding competition and entertainment both during Le Mans and the remainder of the schedule. I find it more captivating than Formula One or IMSA or ... anything else.

Toyota is a formidable and worthy competitor. Their efforts were felled by:

# 7 - Clutch failure after bizarre pitlane incident
# 8 - Hybrid issue and lengthy repairs (but they finished)
# 9 - Contact with LMP2 car, puncture, fire

Be in no doubt that they had the faster car (as they did last year) and could have won were circumstances different. Both teams dedicate extraordinary financial and human resources to Le Mans and the championship.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:10 PM
  #174  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,711
Received 625 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Will the ACO have a BOP for a 992 Hybrid. I think Porsche prefer this route than going turbo from speaking with people in motorsport.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:14 PM
  #175  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosenbergendo
Will the ACO have a BOP for a 992 Hybrid. I think Porsche prefer this route than going turbo from speaking with people in motorsport.
There was some chatter from the commentators during the race indicating that hybrid GTE is still a ways off due to budgets, weight, complexity, etc.

I'm a bit surprised it's not required for 2020.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:18 PM
  #176  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 258 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
So how are all of the other manufacturers doing it without racing prototypes?

And if you're getting little to no brand/marketing benefit from it, there is no sense in spending money participating in these race series'. They could do the exact same testing and development privately for a **** ton less money. LMP racing is nothing more than a really expensive approach to development, one that Porsche can afford because they've convinced customers that a leather fuse box cover is a must have.
I dont think other manufactures are doing it. At least not to the level of Porsche.
Just look at porsches performance hybrid line up for 2017.
Who else brings high performance hybrid tried and tested technology to the street?

LeMans is a tonne of brand/marketing for Porsche. Especially with the win no matter how few entrants. People in general will remember a winner. That is all that matters as far as the marketing is concerned.

It would be harder to replicate quality R&D outside a racing environment.
It has been this way since the 1960's for performance cars worldwide. Without racing we would not be where we are today.

Porsche racing cars for R&D has worked out for them thus far considering their profit margins and brand loyalty. But I agree they really take it up a notch on upselling things like stupid leather stitched consoles at outrageous prices.

Lets look at how F1 has benefited ferrari. Worked well

Porsche decided not to enter F1 but still focus on motorsport as part of business model. It has also worked out for them. Most profitable car company in the world. Largest one make racing series in the world.

Last edited by tcsracing1; 06-19-2017 at 08:03 PM.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:23 PM
  #177  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 258 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
So if Toyota pulls out, then Porsche will continue to 'race' in LMP1 all by its lonely self and enjoy all these benefits in marketing and R&D?

EDIT: Is Porsche even competing with Toyota in the car market?
I think LMP1 is also technology war/race. Top manufactures want to be #1.
The day porsche is the only LMP1 car is the day that everybody else falls behind in R&D and marketing it. Porsche wins without even racing.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:42 PM
  #178  
T10Chris
Three Wheelin'
 
T10Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,493
Received 192 Likes on 141 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
Another interesting item that has gone unreported on here; there are various clips on the internet but I am unable to link them while at work:

http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/v...d-opportunity/
I read that yesterday and I wonder if the clutch would have lasted the duration of the race if it failed after a couple consecutive start/stops. I saw the clip and there is one official right beside the car, then this alleged fake official (which I do agree does look a bit sketchy) comes out and tells him to go and the nearest official to the car sees this happening and does not react. It's a weird situation and may have contributed to issues, but blaming it on a driver from another team seems more like sour grapes to me.
Old 06-19-2017, 07:59 PM
  #179  
tcsracing1
Rennlist Member
 
tcsracing1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,107
Likes: 0
Received 258 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer
Bingo!

So if LMP is all about providing the rich with the next improved 918, (yawn), it has no interest to me. Next.

Ford didn't need an LMP to kick a$$. Bull chit. Neither did Aston. Hmm come to think of it... Neither did Ferrari.

PAG finished first in a two man race. Hip hip hooray. Hat trick! Give me a break. Sheesh.

All GT3 owners and future buyers are getting their panties in a wad over keeping the flat 6 NA and 6 sp mt and thats all they want we don't need all the "wonderful" stuff they are supposedly learning in LMP. The GT3 will be relegated to a non competitive fun to drive sports car.


In the meantime my cars so called racing representative the RSR nad R hasn't done so well and they may not even homologate the mid engine 911 in the near future if ever. Seems like PAG needs to start geting their heads out of their a$$ in WEC.

Ford made another kick a$$ FGT in less than 2 years and it won first year out without an "LMP" program. Fords sell for a fraction of any Porsche. PAG saw the Ford GT coming for at least two years. Did nothing except enjoy their fat profit margins and rest on their laurels.

I hope PAG is reading this. They're not impressing me. How about you?
I wouldnt exactly call bingo yet...

LMP1 and the 918 project are test of things to come for Porsche. It not just for the rich with the next 918... These technologies will become more developed, affordable and trickle down into their street car lineup.
The new 992 is making room for hybrid technolgy tried and tested from the 919 program....

Ford, Ferrari and Aston Martin indeed did not need LMP1 R&D to kick *** in GTE.
However, Ford, Ferrari and Aston Martin are not commited to performance hybrid or performance electric technology for their street cars that of Porsche which is probably why they could not be bothered with LMP1. Porsche is mainly using the enginnering of LMP1 for their street cars which is important to them.

A two man race might seem a bit lame, but then again the knowledge learned by the failure of every party involved this year no matter the lack of participants will be used to again progress the development of faster and more reliable cars in the future.

It has been mixed results for the DFI R and mid engine RSR since they came on the world sceene.
This is why I still cannot understand why they havent made the bump up to turbos like everybody else? Perhaps they feel the hybrid is the "final solution" lol.
Can you imagine where the R and RSR would be if they had turbos since last year....
Old 06-19-2017, 08:14 PM
  #180  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 201 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T10Chris
I read that yesterday and I wonder if the clutch would have lasted the duration of the race if it failed after a couple consecutive start/stops. I saw the clip and there is one official right beside the car, then this alleged fake official (which I do agree does look a bit sketchy) comes out and tells him to go and the nearest official to the car sees this happening and does not react. It's a weird situation and may have contributed to issues, but blaming it on a driver from another team seems more like sour grapes to me.
I think it's fair to say:

"Freak" / black swan event

The "fake" official is simply another driver in a drivers suit that happens to be orange (has on a helmet with HANS anchors)

The other driver was being playful and didn't intend what happened

Toyota themselves never insinuated this was an excuse, just an explanation


Quick Reply: 2017 LeMans



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:33 AM.