GT3.2 Nordschleife
#256
Rennlist Member
Thank you very much for posting Nur!
Still faster then and GT3RS on either tire then.
Looks like the GT2RS will beat it but will cost double.
The GT R is a Bargain at GT3 pricing.
Much more entertaining and better value for the occasional track guy.
Still faster then and GT3RS on either tire then.
Looks like the GT2RS will beat it but will cost double.
The GT R is a Bargain at GT3 pricing.
Much more entertaining and better value for the occasional track guy.
#257
Reading the above it does not sound to me like Mercedes used the "new" version of the Sport Cup 2 at all. Instead it sounds like an option tire that's tuned to virtually ignore streetability. Wider, higher and narrower temperature operating range, run flat... to me that says ride comfort, wet performance, cool weather performance and tread life are all compromised.
As a result the tire is nearly 1 second per minute faster, for a likely 6 second advantage on the 'Ring. Nice data to have, and thanks for posting, but my takeaway is that Porsche should start selling Hoosiers at the dealer to level the playing field... Which in not a terrible idea actually. I'd love for Michelin to work up 2 compounds, one for autocross and the other for the big track, with comfort and wet performance thrown out the window...
With that in mind: per the above the AMG GT R is faster than both the GT3 and the 918, and I completely agree*. I wonder how Porsche will respond?
As a result the tire is nearly 1 second per minute faster, for a likely 6 second advantage on the 'Ring. Nice data to have, and thanks for posting, but my takeaway is that Porsche should start selling Hoosiers at the dealer to level the playing field... Which in not a terrible idea actually. I'd love for Michelin to work up 2 compounds, one for autocross and the other for the big track, with comfort and wet performance thrown out the window...
With that in mind: per the above the AMG GT R is faster than both the GT3 and the 918, and I completely agree*. I wonder how Porsche will respond?
#258
Rennlist Member
I'd take issue with 7:1 as well; really need to isolate where you're losing the mass.
PCCBs save 37 lbs (new) when you consider the weight of the pads. More like 30 lbs average with both rotors half worn, and the gyroscopic effect is less because the iron rotors are smaller diameter. I did a write up here a while back that's relevant. The whole thread is best to read for context, but this post crystallizes the issue:
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/8759...l#post12319468
PCCBs save 37 lbs (new) when you consider the weight of the pads. More like 30 lbs average with both rotors half worn, and the gyroscopic effect is less because the iron rotors are smaller diameter. I did a write up here a while back that's relevant. The whole thread is best to read for context, but this post crystallizes the issue:
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/8759...l#post12319468
#259
Agreed, pending confirmation both of resale and durability on the track, especially with cooling issues as so many modern force-fed cars seem to have issue with. Here on CotA, I've seen just about every high end car imaginable succumb to heat one way or another, except for modern Porsches... and maybe miatas. ;-)
- They are raising the bar to becme more competitive with the cars of other manufacturers, which are getting very quick.
- With the FeFi in question, the GT3RS also needs to step up the game a bit to fill in that upper echelon of performance.
- Moreso, they are also raising the bar internally to make room for a faster GT4 product that isn't right up next to the GT3, but still competitive in the marketplace.
- Plus, higher performance justifies higher pricing across the board.
Also interesting, even Porsche Corporate like AP is publicly suggesting that for track use, get the Steels...
#260
Race Director
technical info regarding the lambo aero solution...
interesting points:
-they use a tiny electric valve flap which opens and closes to stall the airflow to the wing, which is vastly lighter and more efficient than using hydraulics to move the entire wing or front spoiler.
-they say that they can reduce the amount of steering input by effectively squashing the inside of the car down during turns
small valve flaps inside the rear wing and front spoiler can quickly increase downforce and drag, or close to stall the wing and reduce downforce and drag.
same happens in the front, without the use of complicated and heavy hydraulics to move large bodyparts like other manufacturers. they use a tiny valve to manage airflow instead.. surprisingly understated and smart on the part of lamborghini.
variable left to right control on the rear helps the car stay flatter in corners, and lamborghini says reduce the amount of steering input.
#261
Lap was on the new option tire corsa N0, wich is only developed to set faster Times' on lap and to provide better braking on track. Poor M4 GTS, It lap when 30+ temp, even Christian told in sport auto It did suffer due to that(2xturbo)
anyway this Porsche got perfect 14 degree temp. Guys, there is a reason factory always lap in early mornings/cold air and at best temp
anyway this Porsche got perfect 14 degree temp. Guys, there is a reason factory always lap in early mornings/cold air and at best temp
#262
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
That is Fast!
#264
Rennlist Member
Despite what AP may or may not say...Porsche sets all of their best Nurburgring lap times on PCCB (see above), all of the 991.2 GT3 at press track events have PCCB, all of the GT cars I have seen/driven at PEC had PCCB...
#265
#266
I did just now drive my friend new carrera S, It its nice as you can not feel thats a turbo car. But its not the racecar feel you get in GTS. Still its an normal street Porsche, dang I like the new steerinwheel
I want my GT3 gen 2 now Please ..
I want my GT3 gen 2 now Please ..
#267
Do you have an allocation? Damn im looking forward to see you lapping that car on the norschleife!!
#269
A 50 degree F increase in temperature has the same effect on air density as a ~2500 ft increase in altitude. This hurts downforce slightly but the bigger impact is on engine power (both air in the cylinder and effective compression ratio are reduced) and tire temperature.
Airplane wings work the same as car wings. When air temperature increases landing speeds get fractionally higher (as with altitude) but the plane isn't going to drop out of the sky. I can image the car feeling lighter over rises it was previously nailed down to, but in reality the effect would be fractional.